Children’s Health Defense: The Covid Vaccine On Trial: If You Only Knew…

Hit graphic to go to video

Accountability

Very long.

The Covid Vaccine On Trial: If You Only Knew…

VIDEO TRANSCRIPT

(https://childrenshealthdefense.org/transcripts/the-covid-vaccine-on-trial-if-you-only-knew/)

See full information for this video.

Maureen McDonnell: Good evening. On behalf of the organizations that collaborated to create this event, Millions Against Medical Mandates, Children’s Health Defense and The Autism Action Network, it is my great pleasure to welcome you to this educational forum. My name is Maureen McDonnell, and I’m one of the organizers, and along with Curtis Cost, we will be moderating this event and introducing you to these world-renowned experts.

Maureen McDonnell: Very quickly, I was a pediatric registered nurse for over 40 years, and during that time, I organized dozens of children’s health conferences where I met hundreds, if not thousands, of parents of children who were harmed by vaccines. When these parents learned about the role of vaccines had played in causing their children’s health problems, or their behavioral or developmental conditions, many of these parents came up to me at these events and looked me straight in the eye and said, “If only I knew then what I know now, boy would I have made different decisions.”

Maureen McDonnell: All the presenters you are about to hear from tonight are here for one reason. They don’t want you to look back at this time and this decision as to whether or not to take this particular vaccine and say, “If only I knew then.” As we all know, censorship is now at an all time high, yet few topics are more significant than this one. One has to ask, why is there so much mistrust of this vaccine, and why is it so difficult to obtain information and have a discussion about the science and data related to this particular vaccine?

Maureen McDonnell: This webinar seeks to fill the void that has been created by the extreme level of censorship and answer some of those hard questions that you and millions of concerned individuals around the world are asking. Some 40,000 people registered for this event. Many are listening live and many more will access the recording that will be on childrenshealthdefense.org website, along with the transcript.

It will also be on Millions Against Medical Mandates’ website. It’s also being live streamed on Children’s Health Defense Facebook page which you can share now. Questions can be posted in the chat and the organizers will go through them and make sort of a Q&A document and make it available to you after this event.

Maureen McDonnell: One last comment before I turn it over to my co-host, Curtis Cost. As many of you know, some people in media are trying to paint those of us in to health freedom movement as extremists, or they say we are spreading misinformation. Some even say that when one inquires into the safety and effectiveness of this vaccine, they are engaging in hate speech. Well, I’m here to tell you as a nurse, a mother and a grandmother, that nothing, absolutely nothing, could be further from the truth.

The brilliant and dedicated medical doctors, lawyers, scientists and activists you will hear tonight care deeply about finding and reporting the truth. They care about our health and our freedom to make our own choices. Like millions around the world who also want to examine this vaccine more closely, these individuals love their family and they love humanity. And that, my friends, is why we are all here tonight.

Maureen McDonnell: As John F. Kennedy once said, “Without debate, without criticism, no administration and no country can succeed and no republic can survive.” He goes on to state that, “An ancient Greek lawmaker once decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy.” This has definitely become the controversy of our lifetime, and I beg you not to shrink from it.

Learn from these experts, do your own research, make your own decision, but make them informed decisions. At this precarious time in history, it is time to face this issue head-on. To do that, we must have open debate, we must be honest, transparent and have integrity. Tonight, let us go beyond the divisiveness, let us be inquisitive and examine both sides of this discussion by diving deeply into the facts. Thank you, and now let me turn it over to my co-host, Curtis Cost. Curtis?

Curtis Cost: Maureen, thank you very much. I want to thank everybody for taking the time out of their busy schedules to be a part of this event. First, background who I am. I’m Curtis Cost, I’m one of the organizers of this event. I’m also the author of the book, Vaccines Are Dangerous, and I’ve been out there warning people about potential dangers of vaccines for roughly 30 years. I also work with Children’s Health Defense, and I was recently asked to join Millions Against Medical Mandates’ steering committee. So I’ve been out there trying to get information out. And this event is monumental for a lot of reasons I’m gonna outline very quickly.

First and foremost, before I continue, I wanna say that you’re gona hear a lot of things tonight, but the speakers are speaking on their own behalf, their own views based on their research. And what they say may not necessarily be on behalf of… Or may not be in line with the various organizations involved in this event. So just want to throw that out there.

This is an historic event. I mean, it’s unbelievable, we have tens of thousands of people around the world who are tuning in to this, and we have a fantastic line-up of speakers, as I’m sure you all know, why you’re here. And tonight, you’re gonna hear a lot of things. No matter how much you may already know about the subject, I guarantee you’re gonna hear a lot of new things and controversial things. And I encourage everyone to get a notebook and pen because you’re about to go on a serious roller coaster ride.

Curtis Cost: This COVID issue, it’s one of the most important issues of the day, and it’s probably the most important decision anyone’s gonna make in their life, so this event hopefully will add to the information that will help you make a better decision. And I do wanna give a shout-out to a lot of the people who have been involved in making this happen.

It’s been unbelievable, all the people doing the marketing and things of that nature to make this a success and have the number of people we have today. And I do wanna give a special shout-out to two people, Danielle Gale and Antonio Dunbar, because among the things that they’ve done is they were going out in the snow and the cold, giving out hundreds of flyers in the communities, which was stunning and it shows real commitment. And a lot of people, who I can’t even begin to name, have been very actively involved.

Curtis Cost: With that said, I just wanted to introduce Mr. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. To begin with, Mr. Kennedy was an attorney working on environmental issues, had tremendous success in doing that. He’s also the founder of Children’s Health Defense. He’s a brilliant researcher and he’s a true warrior. He fights for the safety of children and adults.

And Mr. Kennedy has been spreading hope across the country and around the world with his various activities and lawsuits and other things he’s doing, all the information he’s been putting out for the general public. So, I wanted to just last say about Mr. Kennedy before we bring him on is that he’s one of my personal heroes. I really admire him, he’s a person you can believe in. And so, with that said, as soon as you’re ready, we can bring on Mr. Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr: Hey, everybody. I’m Robert F. Kennedy Jr. And welcome to The COVID Vaccine on Trial. Thank you all for signing up and participating in this important event. We have some extraordinary speakers to talk to you today, to educate us and inform us and to weaponize the information that we need to know to fight some of the medical totalitarianism that is beginning to cast … not beginning, but has already cast a very dark shadow on our country.

I wanna talk specifically and very briefly about an article that I published in The Defender earlier this week. And I would urge you, those of you who have not looked at that article, to please look at it and then, I’m gonna ask you maybe to start sending it to people like David Kessler and Ron Klain and other people in the administration because it makes a very important point.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr: And the article is what began as a response to my initial article in The Defender in which I pointed out that Hank Aaron’s death was part of a wave of deaths among seniors, among elderly people, Americans, following vaccination. And what I said was true. I did not say that Hank Aaron died of the COVID vaccine. I said… And as you guys know, as many of you know, Hank Aaron did a press conference that was arranged by HHS in order to persuade Black Americans to take the COVID vaccine. And he took the vaccine in a public press conference and then, 17 days later, he passed away. And his message to Black Americans was, “The vaccine is safe. Look, I’m doing it.” I knew Hank Aaron and I admired him enormously, and without any reservation.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr: But because of the peculiar circumstances of his death, it seems a fair object of scrutiny. And so, I wrote that very, very gentle and really, a not very assertive but a pretty obvious observation, but the national press reacted with this extraordinary cascade of vitriolization and anger and moral outrage. ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, Inside Edition, Meet the Press, The New York Times, The LA Times, The Houston Chronicle, The Chicago Tribune, all did editorials condemning me for making this connection. And I was puzzled by this because all of those articles cited the Fulton County Coroner’s Office were assuring the public that Hank Aaron’s death was not caused by a vaccine.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr: I was curious about that because there is a way to make that determination medically. Vaccine injuries come in all kinds of guises: Seizures, heart attacks, inflammation, stroke and many, many other injuries that cause vaccination. And the facts that are triggered, they may be existing co-morbidities.

That and the trauma is triggered by the vaccine but there’s no fingerprint left by the vaccine. You don’t know whether that injury… We don’t know whether Hank Aaron would have died. He was 86 years old. We have no idea whether he would have died 17 days after that vaccine, whether he had the vaccine or not. There is no way in most cases to blame an individual death on vaccination.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr: As you know, there are 400 different injuries. Many of them are potentially lethal and are listed on manufacturer’s inserts. There’s 175 injuries that The Institute of Medicine has said, “We think these are coming from vaccines but we don’t know.” Many of them are lethal.

In the thousands of cases that have been brought before the vaccine court, the government always takes the position that that injury was not caused by vaccine. And yet, the court has paid out $4.5 billion after determining that, yes, it was caused by the vaccine. So there’s always an argument, there’s always a dispute, and that’s fair. There is no way that anybody can say Hank Aaron died from that vaccine, but there’s no way that anybody can say that he didn’t.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr: So I wanted to speak to the medical genius at the coroner’s office to find out how they had made that determination. I spent a lot of time waiting on telephones, but they were surprisingly professional, and they connected me with an investigator who told me, when I asked the question, who informed me, “We never had Hank Aaron’s body. The family did not give it to us. There was no autopsy. There was no postmortem. There was never any necropsy or any autopsy by anybody. His personal doctor assumed that he died of natural causes. And in those cases, the coroner’s office does not take jurisdiction. We never saw him.”

I said, “Oh.” The national press had simply lied to the American public by saying that they were told by the coroner’s office that the coroner’s office had done an investigation and made the determination that Hank Aaron died of natural causes.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr: So, I ask you to think about that and to think about, “This is about what Emerson said,” and I’ll paraphrase it, “If a tree falls in the forest and nobody hears it fall, and the lumber companies claim it never fell… ” Well, that’s where we are today. If nobody reports the vaccine injury, if they can suppress it, if they can successfully suppress reports about vaccine injury, which they are systematically doing, and the vaccine company come back and say, “See, we proved it safe.” And that’s exactly what’s gonna happen.

So, keep that in mind. Pull that article that I wrote. Send copies of it to David Kessler and copies to Ron Klain. You can also send it to all the reporters who wrote those nasty stories about me, and I will appreciate it. Anyway, have a great time at the conference. I look forward to seeing all of you here and on the barricades, and God bless all of you.

Maureen McDonnell: Thank you, Mr. Kennedy. Mary Holland is our next speaker. Mary Holland is a former law professor from NYU and Columbia University. She is currently the President and General Counsel at Children’s Health Defense. Mary Holland, as you will hear, has a unique combination of kindness, brilliance and wisdom. Mary?

Mary Holland: Thank you so much, Maureen. I saw an online post today that said, “We’re drowning in information and starved for wisdom.” That encapsulates where we are today on COVID-19 vaccines. People throughout the world have been bombarded with information 24/7 for a year about COVID, lockdowns, masks, vaccines and more, and yet wisdom is in scant supply.

So, how has it come to pass that seven billion people on the planet are now being asked to take experimental injections called Messenger RNA vaccines to protect against coronavirus? Let’s just marvel for a moment at the idea that the human race rarely, if ever, has done anything together in lockstep, and yet populations around the world are walking almost in lockstep towards COVID-19 experimental vaccination. This has only been made possible by a perfect legal storm. Let me explain.

Mary Holland: Last year on January 30th, the World Health Organization announced a public health emergency of international concern. The very next day, the US Secretary of Health and Human Services, Alex Azar, declared a public health emergency in the United States. And on March 17th, he retroactively declared that the impressive liability shield of the PREP Act would take effect as of February 4th. The PREP Act, or the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, is an extraordinary liability shield that Congress enacted in 2005 to protect manufacturers, healthcare providers, and government planners from liability during a declared emergency for covered countermeasures, such as test drugs or vaccines.

Today, there are two COVID vaccines on the market in the United States that the Food and Drug Administration authorized under the PREP Act. These are “emergency use authorization” products: The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and the Moderna vaccine.

Mary Holland: Let’s be clear, the FDA has not approved these vaccines or licensed them. It has authorized their use, having decided that they may be effective. Not that they are effective, that they may be effective against this coronavirus public health emergency. But there’s a catch. The FDA can only authorize covered countermeasures when there are no adequate approved and available alternatives.

In many countries, including the US, apparently effective therapeutic interventions like hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, Vitamin D, Vitamin C, zinc, and other treatments have been sidelined. Doctors, research articles, and news articles advocating these interventions were censored. Could there be a connection between this overt suppression and the need to justify these vaccines as the only available alternatives? This question deserves searching scrutiny.

Mary Holland: States, even the US Military, may not mandate emergency use authorization products. These products must be subject to consent or refusal. When the military, years ago, tried to mandate EUA anthrax vaccines, a federal court said, “No, the soldiers could not be forced to accept experimental or investigational vaccines.”

CDC officials have confirmed many times this year that state institutions cannot mandate these Messenger RNA vaccines. Why? Because the US has long upheld the first principle of the Nuremberg Code: That the consent of the individual is absolutely essential in any scientific experiment. And make no mistake, these vaccines are experimental.

Mary Holland: So why would it be so advantageous to pharmaceutical companies, governments and healthcare providers to have these experimental products be under an Emergency Use Authorization? Well, because bottom line, they are risk-free to these actors who are driving this operation, in practice, completely, totally, extraordinarily, risk-free to them, but not to you. Here are the basics under the PREP Act, if you were to be injured or die. You have to apply to a government administrative program, the Counter Measures Injury Compensation Program, not a court. You have to apply within a year.

If your injury appears 366 days after your injection, tough luck. You have to pay your own lawyer. There’s no hearing. If you lose, there’s no appeal. Everything is on paper, nothing in-person, no witnesses, no experts. There’s no published decisions from this program, there’s no reserved fund for compensation. And this program will pay people based on compelling, reliable, valid medical and scientific evidence.

And just how much of that evidence do you think exists today? Remember, the clinical trials for these products are still ongoing, and both companies have already started to vaccinate the so-called control groups. Will there be any reliable and valid evidence on which to base compensation decisions any time soon? I doubt it.

Mary Holland: At best, what we know historically is that this program has compensated under 8% of all petitions. So is there any way to get to a court to review any compensation decision from this tribunal? Well, sort of.

Let’s say that you wanted to sue one of the manufacturers because you think they knew or should have known that the vaccine would kill your loved one. What would you have to prove? You would have to prove that the defendant had willful misconduct, which means the manufacturer intentionally tried to achieve a wrongful purpose, knowingly without legal or factual justification and in disregard of a known or obvious risk that is so great as to make it highly probable that the harm will outweigh the benefit.

Mary Holland: So that’s already an incredibly high burden, but just to pile on, you’d have to prove this according to a standard of clear and convincing evidence, you’d have to bring your case in Washington DC regardless of where you live, you’d have to argue to three judges, not one, with very little opportunity for discovery to get information.

And here’s the kicker, Health and Human Services, the very organization that authorized the emergency and the emergency use products or their defense attorneys, the Department of Justice, would have to first initiate an enforcement action against the manufacturer. Do you see this in-your-face conflict of interest? The very organization that authorized these EUA products is supposed to pave the way for you to sue the manufacturer with which it enjoys a very cozy financial relationship. “When hell freezes over,” may be the apt phrase here.

Mary Holland: The federal government does have a passive reporting system that’s already racked up over 11,000 injuries and 500 deaths for these two vaccines since mid-December, but we know historically that this system catches only a tiny fraction, probably under 1% of all vaccine-related injuries. Congress didn’t pass the PREP Act without opposition. 20 senators rightly called for its repeal saying that the law could be used to allow manufacturers of virtually any drug or vaccine to escape responsibility for gross negligence and even criminal acts. But worst of all, commentators have observed that because liability for willful misconduct requires knowledge, the manufacturers are actually incentivized to know as little as possible about the true risks.

Mary Holland: So in three months of observation, how much could the manufacturers or anyone else truly know about the long-term adverse effects of these vaccines? The answer is almost nothing. This new mRNA technology does not arise out of the vacuum. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the four biggest vaccine manufacturers, Pfizer, Merck, GSK and Sanofi, have all been funding biotech firms, including those manufacturing the COVID vaccines today, looking for the next big thing in vaccine profits.

Please don’t think for a minute that the push to vaccinate the world will be over with COVID-19. The leading biotech hubs with backing from the biggest manufacturers have over 65 mRNA vaccines in the pipeline. These vaccines are coming to countries near you, and soon. And just who are these giant manufacturers leaping forward towards the next great technology through this massive rollout? The Big Four, Pfizer, Merck, GSK and Sanofi, have all paid out over #33 billion in criminal and civil fines for falsifying data, bribing doctors and lying to the public.

Mary Holland: So here we are in this perfect legal storm with governments around the world pushing experimental, liability-free, serious medical interventions on all people, including incredibly fragile and vulnerable people, under the banner of safe and effective, when both of those propositions are flatly false. These vaccines are not proven safe. They are experimental, meaning that their true safety is unknown, but that some people at the FDA believed that the benefits outweighed the risks.

And these vaccines are not proven effective. They may be effective; that is all. No one will have liability for what happens with these products, but you. If something goes wrong, I use the acronym YOYO, You Are On Your Own. Doctors likely won’t know what to do to help you if you’re injured and there will likely be no compensation for you for lost bodily function, lost employment or lost loved ones. It’s your choice whether to take these vaccines. Please make it wisely. Thank you.

Maureen McDonnell: Thank you, Mary Holland. I just wanted to mention that if people are having trouble being in with us tonight, you can share the Zoom link that you have with your friends. They should also check their spam folders and it might be… The Zoom may have been in there. I’m seeing people from Israel, from Australia, all over the US. This is very exciting, so welcome, everyone.

Our next speaker is Dr. Sherri Tenpenny. Dr. Tenpenny is an osteopathic medical doctor, board certified in three specialties. She was the full-time emergency medicine physician and director of a level two trauma center for 12 years. Dr. Tenpenny’s center near Cleveland, Ohio provides a natural holistic approach to getting well and off of prescription medication.

Dr. Tenpenny has invested nearly 20 years and more than 40,000 hours documenting and exposing the problems associated with vaccines. More than anyone I know, her knowledge and dogged determination to share facts about vaccines has brought her national and international acclaim. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: Thank you so much, Maureen. Thank you. Thank you, everybody, for coming to this tonight. This is a really important conclave of a bunch of people, and I think that this is really going to make a big difference in how people feel about this, either the people who’ve already made up their minds that they’re not gonna get it or the people that really do need to have information to make an informed decision, or for people that they wanna share this on with additional people. So, again, thank you, Maureen, for that and thank you so much for all the people who are joining us from all over the world. So, let me see, Nate, how do I change these slides? I guess I just… He just does it? Okay. So I just say, “Next slide, please,” when I’m ready? Yes? No? Yes?

Nate: Yes, yes, yes.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: Okay, thank you. Alright, so what I’m gonna do here tonight is really important. This is the first time that I’ve ever really released this information and I think it’s really important for everybody to know because the question keeps coming up: What’s happening with these vaccines? So I will tell you that this is… These 10 slides are actually the core set of what’s module number two in our upcoming boot camp. And if you like this little sampling of what this is, these will be blown up into three times as much material in our next boot camp, which is… Open enrollment is now and it begins on March the first.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: These are the three primary categories or bullet points that I’m gonna be talking about tonight. Reports of injuries and deaths, Bobby alluded to it, Mary talked about it with the Injury Compensation Act, and I’m just gonna give you some quick fact stats, so you can see up-to-date where we are. I’ve outlined seven mechanisms of injury. Actually, eight. I just was noticing on my slides, I made a mistake on one thing. I will talk about that in just a minute. But there are at least seven mechanisms of injury of how these vaccines, both the Moderna and the Pfizer vaccines, are going to cause harm and, quite frankly, a lot of deaths around the world. This comes primarily from the mainstream medical literature. Like I said, I’ve outlined at least seven and I believe that there are many more.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: And then the third thing, I’ve been reading through the Moderna patent, and I found a couple of things that I think are really important where they flat out lied to us by saying that this vaccine doesn’t have any adjuvants, and we’ll talk a little bit about how the messenger RNA actually works to get the material inside of your genetics. We keep talking about this as being a vaccine, and if you listen to some of David Martin’s materials, you know that this really is a genetic manipulation tool. It doesn’t follow any of the criteria of what a vaccine really is and Dr. Palevsky will take a deep dive into explaining that to you. So these are the three categories of what we’re gonna talk about. Next slide, Nate, please.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: So the report of injuries and deaths. This comes from the VAERS database as of January 29th. We’re two weeks past that, so I’m quite sure that the number of injuries and deaths have even exceeded where we are right now. According to the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System website, which is VAERS, part of the 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act, these are the number of reported incidences so far. More than 500 reported deaths, 453 from the US, more than 11,000 reported adverse events and injuries, 690 reports of anaphylactic reactions to both the Moderna and the Pfizer vaccine, 139 cases of what they call facial asymmetry, which by everyone’s standards is Bell’s palsy, and there have been at least 13 miscarriages. And what’s interesting about the VAERS database is this is a passive system that collects information from across all walks of life, and it’s astonishing to me how few physicians know about it, how few people in America know about it, and even if you do know about it, how difficult it is to actually file a report. Anyone can file a report. It can be you, your doctor, your neighbor, your parents, your siblings can file a report.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: I’ve been on multiple phone calls a day. In fact, I’ve done… [chuckle] I did over 400 interviews in 2020 and I have been talking to so many other groups and many physicians that have no idea about the VAERS database, have no idea on how to file a report, have no idea that billions of dollars have been paid out in injury compensation programs. And so this is from a government database where now we have over 500 deaths and 11,000 injuries by the end of January. So in two months, we’ve seen this much carnage. And I challenge everyone who’s listening to this to answer this question: Can you think of any other product in any other industry at any other point in time that has caused this much damage in eight weeks that is still on the market? And not only still on the market, but pushing for full steam ahead to get a little bit of this in every person’s arm? So take a step back and think about what that actually means, and it’s a much bigger agenda, as I’m sure many of you know. Next slide, Nate.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: So we’re gonna talk about these mechanisms of injury, and they are documented on these slides as MOI, which stands for Mechanisms Of Injury. Next slide, please. The first Mechanism Of Injury that many of you have probably heard about is anaphylaxis, and what is the anaphylaxis? But it’s shock. It’s that you have a severe allergic reaction where your blood pressure drops, you stop breathing, and your tongue swells, you can stop breathing, you have a rash profound across your body. So anaphylaxis, this was the number of the anaphylactic cases as of January 10th. And again, I’m sure there’s more since then. The Moderna vaccine reports 2.1 cases per million, the Pfizer vaccine about 11 cases per million. Now, here’s where I think it’s really interesting and problematic, that the symptoms of onset range from anywhere from 13 minutes after your injection to up to 30 minutes. And now they’re doing all these drive-by vaccines where you can drive into a police department, a fire department, I saw pictures of them, that first responders were giving shots out people’s windows, that you stick your arm out the window and you can get a shot.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: Now, what happens if within the next 13 minutes on your way home, you go into anaphylactic shock? People can die from that, and if it happens while you’re driving a car, you could kill people by actually driving into other people. So this is a really serious problem. What’s also interesting is that 80% of those involved in anaphylactic shock are women. Many of these reactions have been attributed to an additive called polyethylene glycol, which is another whole big discussion in and of itself.

And then it’s been estimated that up to 30% of the population has a history of allergies and allergic reactions, and I would make a wager that it is much, much higher than that, because if you think about all the people that have asthma allergies, eczema, and they have any sort of allergic reactions, anybody that’s on steroid medications, anybody on a biologic, all of those people are subject to risk of anaphylactic shock. And then there are non-anaphylactic allergic reactions which are severe, can end up people in the hospital, and those can, again, occur within 15 minutes to one day.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: So I would certainly advocate for all of your friends or family members who are running to the front of the line to get this vaccine, to absolutely not take the shot in a drive-by vaccine clinic. Please go someplace else where you could be safe, you could be in a controlled situation that if you go into anaphylactic shock there is a medical care there available for you. Next slide, please.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: Mechanism Of Injury number two is the direct adverse effect of the anti-spike immunoglobulins. Now, the whole purpose of vaccines in the way that you see it, in all of the vaccines that are available, is to inject foreign matter to develop an antibody. That antibody then, and all other vaccines, is ostensibly telling you that you are immune, and if you get exposed to the virus or some other pathogen, that antibody will neutralize that pathogen and keep you from getting sick.

One take-home message that I want you to know is that this is not just another vaccine. It’s not just like getting a flu shot or a pneumonia shot or a shingles shot. This is nothing to do with any vaccine you’ve ever been exposed to before. The antibody that is created to this anti-spike protein that is injected in the messenger RNA, the higher the antibody level, the higher the antibody level, the more severe the side effect and reaction that you will see.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: I’ve been told by epidemiologists in Europe that it can take up to 42 days after getting an injection to develop the highest concentrations of the anti-spike antibody. So people aren’t gonna get the shot, and unless you have anaphylaxis, see a serious reaction. It’s going to be six months, 12 months, 15 months later, and particularly after they get the second vaccine. So this Mechanism Of Injury is that antibody that’s supposed to protect you is actually going to attack you and particularly attack your lungs.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: Mechanism Of Injury number three is that it’s not only that the antibody can cause autoimmune reactions and make you sick and break down your tissues. As that antibody floats around in your system and you get re-exposed to coronaviruses that are out in circulation, that’s when the accelerated autoimmune reactions happen. There are more than 30 different coronaviruses, they’ve been around for 60 years, seven of them are known to attack human beings.

And it’s when the antibody that’s floating around in your system gets re-exposed to coronaviruses that that accelerated autoimmunity occurs. We have no idea how long that risk is going to be. Do those antibodies last for one week, one month, six months, one year, five years? We have no idea, ’cause it’s all experimental, and nobody knows how long this reaction or this risk of serious reaction is going to last. Next side, please.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: Mechanism Of Injury number four is that if you’ve had a flu shot prior to getting a coronavirus vaccine, that you have an accelerated risk of developing a much more severe side effect and reaction because of the influenza viruses themselves and because of the antibodies that are made for when you get a flu shot. The US military has already done studies and research on this, and they say that if you’ve gotten a flu shot, you are exponentially more likely to contract coronavirus infection, and exponentially more likely to have an adverse event if you get a coronavirus vaccine. And some of the manufacturers right now are actually developing a vaccine that has both influenza and coronavirus in the same shot.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: Mechanism Of Injury number five is antibody-dependent enhancement, and this is a much longer discussion, but I’m just listing it in our list of mechanisms of injury because they actually have a name for this one. It’s called The Trojan Horse phenomenon. That actually what it does is it grabs hold, that there’s those antibodies that have already been made, get re-exposed to that coronavirus and pull it inside of your cells and start replicating, and it’s like having an on-button with no off-button. And the acceleration of the disease and the type of infection that you get far supersedes anything that you would get if you contracted a coronavirus infection without previously being vaccinated. Next slide, please.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: Mechanism Of Injury number six is with this anti-spike immunoglobulin has a direct modification of M2 macrophages. And in very brief, I will say this, there are two… Macrophages are the type of white blood cell in your system that are the garbage eaters. They’re the ones that eat up all of the infections that as you recover from… When you start to get sick, the M1 macrophages go and cause the battle, cause the fight, make you neutralize the infection. As that battle starts to wane, it’s the M2 macrophages that come in and clean up the mess. They’re the ones that eat up all the residual tissue, and they clean up the mess. The M1 macrophages are pro-inflammatory, the M2 macrophages are anti-inflammatory.

What these anti-spike antibodies do is they kill off or suppress the anti-inflammatory reaction, which means that the M1 cytokines, the pro-inflammatory type of reaction, goes on and on and on. And when they sacrificed the animals that have had this infection and had a vaccine, what they found was that their lungs were full of M1 macrophages and no M2 macrophages were found at all, which is very disturbing, knowing that information and hearing Bobby Kennedy say that there was no autopsy at all that was performed, ’cause perhaps they would have found in the lungs this exact reaction: All M1 macrophages and no M2 macrophages.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: We’re gonna skip number seven there. Nate, go to the next slide, please. Mechanism Of Injury number seven, this should be number seven, is that the anti-spike immuno-antibodies cross-react with human tissue, establishing a mechanism for multi-system autoimmune disorders. We’ve known for a long time that there are thousands of different types of autoimmune reactions under the guise of what is called molecular mimicry. That you create an antibody and it looks around for the virus and bacteria, and if it’s not there, they go, “Oh, look at that, over there, that pancreas cell. It looks very similar to the amino acid sequence on the virus. Let’s go and attack it.”

In this particular study, they used 55 tissue antigens, and they put the serum from a person who had had the vaccine or had had the infection, and they dropped it into the little wells of these tissues. And what they found was that 28 out of 55 tissue types cross-reacted with the anti-spike immuno-globulin, which they’re trying to stimulate you to make with this vaccine, and caused accelerated autoimmune disease in the brain, in the mitochondria, in the central nervous system. If your mitochondria are under attack, it’s why you get the extreme fatigue from this infection or from this vaccine. It’s why you get all the neurological problems, because this vaccine creates an antibody that cross-reacts with your central nervous system, attacks it and starts to break it down. Next slide, please.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: So those are the seven Mechanisms Of Injury. You have listed there was eight. I made a mistake. There should be seven, but there’s seven mechanisms of entry that I’ve identified. I can assure you that there are more than that, but these are seven solid reasons why when you get this vaccine, you can have an anaphylactic reaction and have a serious injury right away, or six other types of reactions that can occur later down the road that can lead to accelerated auto-immunity, breaking down of your lung tissue, and death.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: Now, one issue that I want to describe just briefly comes from the Moderna patent. Now, the Moderna patent, when you start reading this patent, you find out that there are things coming through the syringe that aren’t listed anywhere at all. Like it will say, “This vaccine,” or this genetic manipulation tool, as it should be called, “does not contain an adjuvant,” and technically that’s correct. In that solution, in that vial, there is no adjuvant. But what is in that vial is a messenger RNA, another piece of messenger RNA, that when it goes into your body, into your cells, it starts to create a protein called flagellin, and when it creates that protein called flagellin, you get this huge antibody response.

And remember we said that the higher the antibody response, the more tissue destruction that you see. And it’s an unapproved adjuvant, it’s never been used in humans, it’s never really even been used in animals, and it’s completely experimental. And yet, it is found in the patent, in the vial, in the vaccine of the Moderna shot, that’s going to create more havoc inside of your system somewhere down the road, anywhere from four to six weeks or months in the future to cause death and destruction from this shot. Next slide, please.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: So in conclusion of all of these different things, and this is a direct quote from one of the studies that I used to come up with this information, all of this comes from mainstream peer-reviewed medical literature, and this was the conclusion which I’ll read to you: “Based on the published literature, it should be obvious to any skilled medical practitioner, even back in 2019, that there is a significant risk to vaccine research subjects and vaccine recipients that they may experience severe disease once vaccinated, while they might only have experienced a mild self-limiting infection with a 99% survival rate without the vaccine. The consent should clearly distinguish that the risk of a worsened disease from these generic statements should be separated from the risk of death and the lack of efficacy of this vaccine.” Which means what’s coming through that needle needs to be clearly described to you on your consent form, and this great big risk, which is a lie about the risk of death and the risk of death from a virus that has a 99% survival rate. Next slide, please.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: And all I’m saying here is that when you get this, and this slide and the next slide, Nate, are the references from the mainstream medical literature that I used for that very short presentation. Next slide, please. And if you like this and you would like to learn a little bit more, you can come to our boot camp. You guys should take a screenshot of this or write it down: Masteringvaccineinfo.com/2021bootcamp. We will take a huge, deep dive into all of this information so that you can have all of this at your finger tips. Thank you so much for your attention. I certainly hope that this brought to you some information you haven’t heard before and that you can now clearly say to anyone who asks you, “Are you going to get the shot?” and you say, “No, thank you. I will take my risk on the side of the infection and not on the side of the vaccine.”

Maureen McDonnell: Thank you, Dr. Tenpenny, so much. What an encyclopedic mind when it comes to vaccines, for sure.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: Thank you, Maureen.

Curtis Cost: Thank you. Yeah, I’d like to introduce Dr. Lawrence Palevsky. He’s a world-famous pediatrician, he gives lectures across the country and around the world. He’s a true fighter for parental rights, and he really cares about patients and making sure they get the correct information to make informed decisions. Dr. Palevsky is brilliant, he’s a warrior and he’s always willing to help with events that I’ve organized, forums, radio shows. He really wants powerful information to get out. And now I will say, really buckle down ’cause he’s gonna blow your mind. Dr. Lawrence Palevsky.

Dr. Lawrence Palevsky: Thank you very much, Curtis. Again, my name is Dr. Lawrence Palevsky, I’m a New York State licensed pediatrician and the title of my talk today is “COVID-19 Injection: Is This A Vaccine?” And so the subjects… The next slide, Nate. The subjects that I’m going to cover today are: What makes an injection a vaccine? What kind of technology is in the COVID-19 injection? For what does the MRNA code? Is the MRNA code specific to protect us just against the SARS-CoV-2 virus? Does this injection cause alteration of our genetic codes or even autoimmunity? And are the symptoms of COVID-19 better or worse than the COVID-19 injection?

Dr. Lawrence Palevsky: And if you notice, I’m not using the word vaccine. I’m using the word injection, because people automatically hear the words COVID-19 vaccine and they have an automatic response. “This is a vaccine, definitely we are saved, we are gonna be protected, they have our back, we’re exactly where we wanna be.” However, only the curious people, only the curious people will come to realize that this vaccine won’t even protect us against a coronavirus infection. And if you’re even more curious, you’ll come to understand that this doesn’t even behave like a vaccine at all. Next slide.

Dr. Lawrence Palevsky: So just in general, if we were talking about what makes an injection a vaccine, there are five criteria that I’m going to review. In order for an injection to be a vaccine, we have to be able to develop an antibody that would give us immunity to any virus or bacterium. And this development of the antibody is what makes a vaccine effective. The second thing is that we need to be protected from getting a viral or a bacterial infection. The third thing is that the injection needs to reduce the number of deaths from that virus or bacterial infection. The fourth thing is that the injection has to help reduce the circulation of the virus or the bacteria against which we are vaccinating our children and adults. And the fifth criteria is that we must have this injection reduce the transmission or spread of viruses or bacteria against which we vaccinate from one person to the next. Next slide please.

Dr. Lawrence Palevsky: So what kind of technology is in the COVID-19 injection? As many of you know, the technology is a messenger RNA, or MRNA technology. Now, this has never before been used successfully to make vaccines. With no track record of an MRNA injection to function like a vaccine, we have no evidence if a messenger RNA injection will provide antibody immunity to any kind of virus or bacterium which would make the vaccine effective. We have no evidence that an MRNA technology can offer protection from getting any viral or bacterial infection. We have no evidence whether an MRNA technology will reduce the number of deaths from a viral or bacterial infection. We have no evidence whether an MRNA injection will reduce the circulation of the viruses or bacteria against which we vaccinate. And we have no evidence whether a messenger RNA will reduce the transmission or spread of any kind of virus or bacteria against which we vaccinate from one person to the next. So remember, we have an MRNA technology but we do not have any evidence that this MRNA technology has been found to work the way we need a vaccine to work. Now, the MRNA codes for a protein on the SARS-CoV-2 virus called the spike protein, and I wanna make it clear there is no reported coronavirus in the injection that people are getting.

Dr. Lawrence Palevsky: Now, what’s interesting that most people may not be aware of is the spike protein, which is supposed to be part of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has been known to be a very unstable protein. And so NIH said, the National Institute of Health said in a statement that science created the, “stabilized Coronavirus spike proteins for the development of vaccines against Coronavirus, including SARS-CoV-2 and the government consequently, has sought patents to preserve the government’s right to these inventions.” I wanna make it clear what this says in English is that the messenger RNA against the spike protein has been altered, it has been stabilized by scientists, which makes this a synthetic messenger RNA. It is not the original MRNA specific to a SARS-CoV-2 virus, it is a synthetic messenger RNA that has been altered and in order to make a patent against a virus with a protein, they have to make the protein synthetic because the manufacturers cannot patent a naturally occurring material.

r. Lawrence Palevsky: So people think that this is a vaccine and they also think that this is an injection that’s going to give them protection against the SARS-CoV-2 virus, but it is just against a synthetic messenger RNA that makes a synthetic spike protein. So is this messenger RNA code that’s making this synthetic spike protein specific solely to the SARS-CoV-2 virus? And the answer is no. We’ve already seen that there are similarities in proteins between the synthetic spike protein and the antibody that’s made and parts of the lung, the kidneys, the brains, the hearts, and the male and female reproductive systems, to which the body will not only mount an immune response against the synthetic spike protein, but also to tissue that is very similar in these parts of the body. And what this will do is lead to a cytokine storm, which is an increase in inflammation and the potential for auto-immunity. So when people say that this injection is safe, they do not have legitimate reasons to say that this is safe, because it has not been tested to see if it will create the cytokine storms, which we know it is already doing, and if it will create the auto-immunity, which we know it will already be doing.

Dr. Lawrence Palevsky: So if we want to look at this injection and check it for vaccine criteria, we have to go through the five questions that I asked before. “Does the COVID-19 injection provide antibody immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, making it an effective vaccine?” The answer is no. Even the manufacturers say that we may not develop immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 virus with this injection. “Does the COVID-19 injection provide us protection from getting a SARS-CoV-2 viral infection?” The answer is no. The manufacturers and the experts have already said that this may reduce the symptoms if you get the infection, but it will not protect you from getting the SARS-CoV-2 viral infection. Three, “Has the COVID-19 injection been shown to reduce the number of deaths from a SARS-CoV-2 infection?” The answer is no. Not only that, but the manufacturers did not test whether this COVID-19 injection would reduce the number of deaths from a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Four, “Has the COVID-19 injection been shown to reduce the circulation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the population?” The answer is no.

Dr. Lawrence Palevsky: “Has the COVID-19 injection been shown to reduce the transmission or spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus from one person to the next?” The answer is no. The manufacturers and the scientific experts have said that, “We did not test this injection to see if it would stop the transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus from one person to the next.” Since none of these criteria, not one of the five criteria have been met that define what is a vaccine, we cannot call this a vaccine. So anyone who’s thinking, anyone who’s literally using their brain cells to critically think, must wonder if this does not behave as a vaccine, what is it and how does it behave in the body, knowing full well that it takes a good seven, 10, maybe even 15 years to answer these five questions that I just raised.

Dr. Lawrence Palevsky: Next slide, Nate. So does this injection cause alteration of our genetic codes or auto-immunity? I also spoke about the auto-immune potential, but the fact is that this messenger RNA, which is very stable when it gets… Unstable when it gets into the body, has not been evaluated for safety, especially because there are particles around it called polyethylene glycol and lipid nanoparticles, which are wrapped around the messenger RNA never before used in vaccines, so there are no safety data on the use of polyethylene glycol and these lipid nanoparticles in injections. And so we have an experimental vaccine, which is not a vaccine, and none of these ingredients that are wrapped around the messenger RNA to stabilize it have ever been tested for safety when injected. So the concern is that these lipid nanoparticles can travel anywhere in the body.

Dr. Lawrence Palevsky: And the potential is also that they can travel into the nuclei of our cells, potentially incorporating the messenger RNA or the byproducts of the messenger RNA processing in the cell that could get into the genetic codes. Has this been tested? No. Is it a concern? Yes, and it’s a concern by many doctors and many scientists all over the world. So in essence, we have no answers as to whether or not this can alter our genetic codes. And so the big question is, are the symptoms of COVID-19 better or worse than the symptoms of the COVID-19 injection? And when you have doctors all over the world successfully treating patients who develop the symptoms of COVID-19 being treated successfully with medications, hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, zinc with copper, vitamin D with K, vitamin C, liposomal glutathione, ozone therapy, hyperbarics, iodine, and many other supplements, and successfully keeping people from dying and yet, we see that the number of people dying from this injection and the number of serious adverse effects are very, very high, we have to question what this is, what people are being injected with, and why it is that the seriousness of these side effects is being censored and people who are getting seriously ill and are dying, we’re not being told about. Next slide.

Dr. Lawrence Palevsky: So I wanna thank you for this opportunity to share this information with you. Please think, is the COVID-19 injection a vaccine? And based on science, good science, based on the science we were taught in medical school and residency, this injection does not fit the criteria of what makes an injection a vaccine. Thank you.

Curtis Cost: Thank you, Dr. Palevsky. Nate, am I on? Can you hear me?

Maureen McDonnell: Yes.

Curtis Cost: Okay, great. Thank you, Dr. Palevsky, and I think that’s something everyone who’s tossing their head whether or not they’re gonna take the vaccine should really consider and do their research. Our next speaker is Kevin Jenkins. He is the CEO of Urban Global Health Alliance. He gives lectures all across the country, he’s focused primarily on the black community on vaccines and I’m really glad that he’s out there for it because for so many years, it’s been just me primarily doing these things. Now we got Kevin and hopefully, some people, from watching this, will also join forces in getting the word out in the Black community, Latino community, and across the board. So Kevin, he’s a real trooper, he’s a very strong speaker, very impassioned and if he’s ready, Kevin, please begin.

Kevin Jenkins: Well, yes, I’m ready. Thank you, Curtis. I hope everybody at home is paying attention, this is a very important evening. I would like to begin… I’d like to thank MAMM and CHD and all of the other people that worked so hard, but a special shout out for Maureen and Curtis because you’re doing a phenomenal job. Going across the country, I get to speak to not just Black Americans but white Americans and educating both groups about how we need to work together to push back against this global tyranny. But today, I’m going to take a different position to try to educate both communities about what’s happened in the past, why this is so critically important, and why Black Americans need to be paying attention to what’s happening in real time.

Kevin Jenkins: I’m gonna read something and then that’s just gonna lead me further in my conversation about what’s going on in the Black community and how we can all work together to do that. This is coming from Margaret Sanger around 1939, she wrote this to Clarence J. Gamble. He is the heir of Procter & Gamble and a major supporter of abortion and a major supporter of eugenics. “We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social service backgrounds and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” So I’d like to gladly say that I’m one of the most rebellious members and my job has been, in the last year, to educate all communities around this country, Latino, Asian, Black, and White, and any other group that’s interested about what we need to do to prepare ourselves against big pharma, what we need to do to prepare ourselves against big tech, and what is the language and what is the strategy.

Kevin Jenkins: But what’s happening now, Margaret Sanger’s diabolical, duplicitous and dangerous and disastrous plan for Black America is still in effect in the 21st century. Her global vision for eugenics, her global vision for annihilating the Black family is in real time. Now, I say that because over the last several months, we’ve heard all over the news that, “Black Americans are not getting their vaccines in a faster way. Black Americans don’t trust these vaccines. Black Americans should be the first to be on line to get these vaccines. Black Americans should be the first to offer their body up as to further experiment against what we know would destroy our community forever.” And one of the things I read, John Hopkins’ CDC Plan to Mask Medical Experimentation on Minorities as Racial Justice. And I found that very interesting that John Hopkins was developing a strategy to communicate with Black Americans under the banner of racial justice, under the banner that white Americans are getting their vaccines quicker than Black Americans and that’s racist.

Kevin Jenkins: But the thing that was even more diabolical, the thing that I knew that Margaret Sanger’s original plan was working today, is this. The Black political class, the pseudo-Black intellectual class, the Black medical profession, the Black so-called media was all working hand-in-hand to fulfill Margaret Sanger’s vision for eugenics, and what it was going to do was further mis-educate the Black Americans about the impact of what Tenpenny, Dr. Tenpenny said and what Dr. Lahrety said, the overall impact on the Black community. So Margaret Sanger’s strategy is still in effect. And right now, we have Black Americans that look like me, the Black church that was closed up for almost a year, now coming up and coming out and taking big pharma’s money. The pseudo-intellectual, all of this, all of my lifetime that was always wholesaling misinformation to negatively impact the Black community is starting to say, “Guess what guys? We chose a side. That side is not you, the side that we have chosen is big pharma. The side that we have chosen is the group that wants to commoditize the Black body.”

Kevin Jenkins: And we all understand what that is as Black Americans. Coming into this country as slaves, being in bondage, crossing over that ocean, being born into this country, and our bodies were experimented on from day one. When we look at our communities now, where are we at? Chronic illness is at an all-time high, autism is at an all-time high, co-morbidities are at a all-time high. Black Americans have been experimented on from the day we have come into this country. But the thing that is most stressing to me right now, every Black group that we thought that would be able to have a bigger conversation in our communities have picked a side. They have chosen death for us, they have chosen slavery for us. This slavery will be something that we have never seen before, for the white community and for the Black community. So we don’t have a choice, we have to listen to Sherri Tenpenny, we have to listen to David Resnick, we have to listen to Mary Hallock, but we have to listen to what our ancestors taught us many, many years ago.

Kevin Jenkins: Crossing over that ocean and then crossing over that river for freedom. When Martin Luther King joined the movement, he said, “Guess what? I’m gonna move out of my comfort, I’m gonna cross that river for social justice.” When Malcolm X stood up for his community, he said, “Listen, I’m gonna move out of comfort and I’m gonna cross that river for social justice.” Black Americans and white Americans all have to cross that river. We have to find our God courage, we have to find our inner being, and we all have to know that all of our humanity is under attack. Everything that we believe in, everything that we value, everything that we love will be taken away from us if we’re not all prepared to cross that river. That river is important for us, that’s what Harriet Tubman did, that’s what Adam Clayton Powell did, that’s what every great American did in this country. We had to cross that river, get past our comfortability, and stand up for humanity. Now, it is our time to do that. This is our defining moment.

Kevin Jenkins: I’m asking all keyboard warriors, I’m asking everybody that’s locked in their house in fear, I’m asking everybody that’s been out here… The most frightening thing is people are out here losing their careers. People are out here getting arrested for standing up for justice. People are out here being told, “If you speak up, we’re going to censor to you.” But guess what? That’s happened before. We all know that history, McCarthyism, we know that history. COINTELPRO, we know that history. Martin Luther King was a terrorist in this country. Our founding fathers was a terrorist, they were terrorists. So it’s now, right now is our time to stand up for this country, stand up for our children and find hope, find our God courage, and guess what? If we do that, we will win. The science, we got, but now we have to find our courage to fight back.

Kevin Jenkins: Now, we have to understand and put this in historical context so we know how to fight back against this tyranny. And this is our time, this is our moment, and I wanted to spend my time sending that message to America and also warning Black America. Don’t worry about the barbarian at the gate, worry about the barbarian inside the gate that looks like us. I thank you very much for the opportunity to speak to you this evening.

Curtis Cost: Thank you. Thank you.

Maureen McDonnell: Kevin, my heart is pounding. That was beautiful and inspiring. Thank you so much.

Kevin Jenkins: Thank you.

Maureen McDonnell: Okay, it’s hard to move on after that. [chuckle] We have our next speaker, Dr. Tom Cowan. After graduating medical school in 1984, Dr. Cowan opened his general medical practice in upstate New York, then in New Hampshire, and then in San Francisco. During these years, he became a founding board member of the Weston A. Price Foundation and still serves as vice president. Dr. Cowan is the author of six books including The Contagion Myth. And his books, four of them have spent time on the Amazon best seller list and each was ranked number one in their respective categories. Dr. Cowan with his wife and two sons have an organic and biodynamic business and his website, drtomcowan.com hosts his popular webinars, as well as being a source of great information on health, Dr. Tom Cowan. And there you go.

Dr. Tom Cowan: There I go. Thank you, Maureen. And dear friends, I was asked to give a brief presentation on the issue of whether SARS-CoV-2 virus is the cause of an illness called COVID-19. Leaving aside for now the question of what exactly is COVID-19, the central question is, “How does any scientist, any virologist prove that a “new virus” is the cause of any illness?” The answer is surprisingly clear and straightforward. It also mimics how any normal human being proves the causation of anything.

Dr. Tom Cowan: The first thing one does is to find a number of people who seem to suffer from the illness in question, this could be COVID-19, AIDS, Hep C, or any other illness. Then, using standard and common virological isolation and purification techniques, techniques that have been in common use in every virology lab for decades, one would isolate the virus from every other substance in the blood, sputum, or tissues of the affected person or animal. Using electron microscopy one then shows the world the pure, isolated particles called viruses from each of these people, all of the viruses should look identical. The next step would be to analyze the genetic material of these identical particles using commonly available, computerized genetic sequencing tools, which have also been available for decades.

Dr. Tom Cowan: These sequences should also be identical from one particle to the next. Finally, these isolated, purified, photographed, and sequenced viruses would then be introduced on to test animals along with rigorous and appropriate controls to see whether the test animals develop the identical illness that the original subjects had. Then and only then, once these steps have been performed can we say with confidence that this new virus is the likely cause of this new illness. During this past year, I have spent countless hours looking for evidence that these simple steps were done for the illness called COVID-19, and that the virus called SARS-CoV-2 was properly isolated and characterized.

Dr. Tom Cowan: To my shock and surprise, neither I nor anyone else I know looking into this issue has yet to find a single published study that even attempted to perform these simple and doable experiments. To my further shock and surprise, I found that not only were these experiments not done with SARS-CoV-2, but they were also not done with AIDS, Hep C, measles, or any other illness supposedly caused by pathogenic viruses. As shocking as this may be to hear, I now ask that if you dispute this, please make available the paper or papers that successfully did these simple experiments. The usual excuses for this utter failure to perform the proper scientific experiments are such statements as, “Well, there’s not enough virus material to see in the sputum of sick people,” or, “Viruses are intracellular organisms and therefore can’t be found in this manner outside the cell.”

Dr. Tom Cowan: My response is, “If there aren’t enough viruses can’t be found from the tissues or secretions of sick people using an electron microscope, then how can these same unfindable viruses have the potential to kill us all? And if the viruses can’t be found outside the cell, so therefore don’t exist outside the cell, then how on earth does it spread from person to person?” Finally, it is incorrect to say that this procedure I outlined above is just one way to isolate and characterize viruses. The reality is, it’s the only way. Clearly logic and common sense dictate that if you have not isolated the thing you are looking for, there is no possible way to determine what the thing is made of or what it alone does.

Dr. Tom Cowan: The implications of what I am saying are enormous. If there is no proof of pathogenic viruses then, “What the heck is making people sick? What is causing what people are calling COVID symptoms? Why do some diseases seem to spread between people but never consistently?” And most important, “Why are we locking down the whole world and risking losing an entire generation of children based on the fear of an imaginary virus?” Unfortunately, I’m out of time now to address these questions, but I have made many videos that are posted on my BitChute and YouTube channels that do address these very questions, so please check them out. And please understand, I do not claim to have all the answers to these important questions of how and why we get sick, but one thing I do know for sure is that there is no solid, scientific proof behind the theory of pathogenic viruses. And if we don’t start asking these questions, things are only going to get worse and worse.

Dr. Tom Cowan: Finally, I want to remind us all that there is no bad guy out there making us mask or isolate our children. There is no bad guy locking us in our homes. There is no bad guy injecting poisons into ourselves and our children. There is no bad guy ruining the businesses that we worked for generations to build. We are doing these things to ourselves, this means we have the power, the agency to stop these practices right now. All it takes is courage, courage. Join me, we can do this. Thanks for listening.

Curtis Cost: Excellent. Dr. Cowan… I mean I encourage people to watch his videos ’cause he goes into a lot more details on this issue, and he’s not alone. There’s a lot of other doctors and scientists with high credentials who’ve been saying the same thing. And I do wanna commend MAMM and Children’s Health Defense for having the encourage to allow this point of view to be expressed here. Mr. Kinny said he wants to move away from those who censor, he doesn’t want censorship. And everybody on this panel may not agree with what Dr. Cowan said, but at least he had a chance to put it out there and people can do their own research and draw their own conclusions.

Curtis Cost: I’m now gonna introduce Dr. Dave Rasnick. Dr. Rasnick is an amazing individual. He has a PhD in chemistry. He’s worked for many years in the pharmaceutical industry. He then decided to move to the side of the public and start revealing some of the things that the general public doesn’t know about vaccines and viruses and these tests that are being given, things of that nature. He’s a true warrior, like a lot of… Everybody here is because personally, I’ve worked with them and whenever I need somebody to do a show, Dr. Rasnick is available. If I need somebody to give testimony to a government agency, Dr. Rasnick is available. He’s truly committed, down-to-earth guy, brilliant. He’s the kind of person to ask the hard questions. With his credentials, he’s the one you go to and as well as all the other speakers here. He’s world famous, he used to be an advisor to the South African government, and without further ado I turn over to Dr. Dave Rasnick.

Dr. Dave Rasnick: Thank you, Curtis. I appreciate it. In 1978, I was one of two PhDs hired to set up the chemistry group in the diagnostics division of Abbott Laboratories in north Chicago, Illinois. During my nearly two decades in the pharmaceutical biotech industry, I learned a lot about clinical diagnostics. Cases of cancer, flu, measles, alcoholism, etcetera, used to be based on clinical symptoms that are consistent and recognized for centuries. However, technology is in the process of destroying the very meaning of disease and how it’s diagnosed. Today, I want to talk about how the PCR test is being used to create cases of flu in people without symptoms of disease. As of January 3, 2020, the China office of the World Health Organization recorded 44 patients with pneumonia of unknown cause.

Dr. Dave Rasnick: Slide, next slide, please. Just four days later, Fan Wu and colleagues in China claim they discovered a Coronavirus, a type of co-virus, in a 41-year-old man. It wasn’t long before that virus was officially declared the cause of those pneumonias. But here’s the question, what was so important about those 44 cases in a country that has over a million pneumonias every year? It is common knowledge that pneumonia can be caused by lots of things. Simply being older, medically compromised, or a patient in a hospital puts one at risk of developing pneumonia. Going from a handful of pneumonias to identifying a new virus from a single individual in a matter of days does not even come close to satisfying minimal scientific standards. It is very difficult and time-consuming to prove the existence of a new virus. It’s even more difficult to prove that it causes pneumonia or anything else, but it is impossible to do any of that if you don’t have authentic virus to begin with.

Dr. Dave Rasnick: When virologist Charles Calisher at Colorado State University was asked last May if he knew of even one paper in which SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated and finding purified, his short email answer was, “I know of no such publication. I have kept an eye out for one.” Even the US Centers for Disease Control admitted in its December 1, 2020 update that, “No quantified virus isolates were available to validate the PCR test.” That’s right, the CDC does not have even a trace of virus to study and no one else does either. So what’s going on?

Dr. Dave Rasnick: From the beginning, Wu and colleagues made the assumption that the man’s symptoms were caused by an infectious agent. When tests were negative for two viruses and a bacterium, they were committed to finding a virus causing his symptoms. They conducted a high-tech dragnet for all the RNA present in the man’s lung sample, but at no point did they work with actual infectious agents including viruses. Nowadays, it’s all technology and no biology. Wu and company used an extremely expensive and complicated new method called metatranscriptomics to pluck millions of RNA fragments from a sample taken from the lungs of that sick man. Then using a different array of very expensive high-tech machines, they determined the specific sequence of building blocks called nucleotides for each and every fragment of RNA in the sample. From the trillions of viruses that inhabit every one of us, including that sick man, a computer algorithm stitched together the nucleotide sequences into a string of RNA, characteristic of a family of cold viruses called Coronavirus.

Dr. Dave Rasnick: Within days, China shared the computer-generated RNA sequence with other countries. Once the army of technologists around the world knew what to look for, almost overnight, the Wu sequence was merged with other constructed Coronavirus sequences to come up with what is called a consensus sequence, which was eventually christened SARS-CoV-2. Ultimately, this consensus sequence was used to develop PCR tests for a virus that the CDC doesn’t have. It is important to understand how the PCR test works because it is the only thing that keeps the phony Coronavirus pandemic going. Next slide, please.

Dr. Dave Rasnick: In 1983, Kary Mullis invented PCR, which stands for polymerase chain reaction. In 1993, he got the Nobel Prize for PCR. PCR is like a photocopier that can make billions of copies of a single fragment of DNA. Kary and I first met through our mutual friend, Peter Duesberg, a professor at the University of California in Berkeley. In 1997, Peter, Kary, and I were invited to a meeting on AIDS in Colombia, South America. Kary explained why his truly amazing invention, PCR, cannot detect viruses in people or diagnose infections. Sadly, Kary Mullis died in August 2019, that’s why I’m here today instead of my friend. The genetic sequences of viruses, especially RNA viruses, are very unstable. So unstable, in fact, there is no such thing as an unmutated RNA virus. Viruses are like snowflakes, no two are identical.

Dr. Dave Rasnick: An international database consortium based in Munich has already catalogued over 400,000 different sequences of SARS-CoV-2. Since SARS-CoV-2 exists only in computers, how does one go about making a PCR test to be used on human samples? It turns out that the most stable sequences of RNA viruses are approximately the same in all members of the viral family, including the family of coronaviruses. The 1% or less of the viral RNA that is amplified by the PCR test is chosen from these relatively stable samples. So at best, the PCR test is targeting a family of RNA viruses and not a specific virus. Before PCR can be done on the RNA of a coronavirus, a process that is error prone must first convert the RNA into DNA. By their very nature, the short synthetic sequences of DNA used to initiate each cycle of the PCR test cannot be guaranteed to distinguish between virus and non-virus. This alone makes PCR test highly suspect. However, these technical limitations were not the reason Kary opposed the PCR test. He simply could not accept equating a string of RNA or DNA with actual virus, Kary was not alone.

Dr. Dave Rasnick: Charles Calisher, who works with real viruses has said, “Just studying genetic sequences is like trying to say whether somebody has bad breath by looking at his fingerprint. When asked, I tell people that using PCR to identify a virus is like conjuring up from a pile of bricks how a building looked before it was demolished.” Technologists have a bad habit of reading too much into genetic sequences. In the early days of genomics, researchers were shocked to discover that mice and humans both have virtually the same number of genes of which 99% are identical. Lisa Stubbs of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory said she knows of only a few cases in which no mouse counterpart can be found for a particular human gene and for the most part, we see essentially a one-to-one correspondence between the genes in the two species. Obviously, what makes a mouse a mouse and a human a human is not in the genes. The whole is not only more than, but decidedly different from the sum of its parts.

Dr. Dave Rasnick: In spite of this obvious fact, many cell biologists and virtually all cancer researchers, diagnostics manufacturers, and drug developers believe they can understand, detect, and control living things one gene at a time. I and many other scientists are outraged by public officials using PCR testing to whip the public into a panic over COVID. With complete disregard for their oaths of office to uphold the Constitution and protect our liberties, politicians and public health authorities are using meaningless PCR testing results to justify lockdowns which are destroying lives, liberty, businesses, and society in general.

Dr. Dave Rasnick: There are two things that keep the phony COVID pandemic going. The first is PCR testing. The second, you may have already guessed, is the endless flood of official propaganda and lies coming from government, departments of public health, and mainstream media. Public discussion, criticism, and debate are not permitted and in some places considered criminal. I want to stress that the PCR tests do not and cannot detect viruses, which means all PCR test results are meaningless. People should refuse PCR testing. If diagnostic PCR testing was stopped immediately, COVID would vanish into thin air and the highly dangerous vaccines can be incinerated. I would be honored to strike the match. Thank you very much.

Curtis Cost: Thank you very much, Dr. Rasnick.

Maureen McDonnell: Thank you, Dr. Rasnick.

Curtis Cost: Yes. Yeah. If you want more, Dr. Rasnick has done a lot of interviews and they’re on YouTube and Children’s Health Defense, and I’ve done a lot of interviews. So, fine. Maureen.

Maureen McDonnell: Yes. Just to let you know, what we’re saying tonight must be very threatening to the powers that be. We were taken off of Facebook at 6:45 PM and CHD was removed and Robert Kennedy, so we’re speaking the truth, we’re telling the truth and that is very threatening to the mainstream narrative. But we have each other, we have the truth, we have the science, so we have to continue and I’m very delighted to introduce our next speaker. Dr. Christiane Northrup is a true visionary and pioneer in women’s health. She is board certified in OB-GYN with more than 30 years of clinical experience, a former assistant clinical professor of OB-GYN at the University of Vermont College of Medicine, and three-time New York Times Bestseller author of several books including my all time favorite, Women’s Bodies, Women’s Wisdom.

Maureen McDonnell: In 2013, Reader’s Digest named Dr. Northrup one of the 100 most trusted people in America. Internationally known for her empowering approach, Dr. Northrup embraces medicine that acknowledges the unity of the mind, body, emotions, and spirit, and teaches women to create health by tuning into their inner wisdom. As a business owner, a physician, a former surgeon, mother, writer, speaker, I and many others consider Dr. Northrup a rebel, rock star, and an authority on what can go right with your body and your health. Dr. Christiane Northrup.

Dr. Christiane Northrup: Thank you, Maureen. And what I’d like to do is begin with a little short documentary, four minutes long, when I was President of the American Holistic Medical Association, along with Bernie Siegel. And long before that, I began to notice that anything natural, first of all, had nothing like the studies on drugs. And those of us who were interested in things like vitamin C, vitamin D, sunlight, walking on the beach, just the things, the natural things that would heal, we were always under threat. And this has been going on for a long time, this is nothing new. So I wanna play this little documentary for you so that you understand what we’re up against. It’s like what’s happening didn’t start with COVID, it started long before. So if we could just play this little four-minute documentary, that’d be great.

Dr. Christiane Northrup: And so, here we are with big pharma running this entire scheme. I wanted to show you something that was just sent out by our state of Maine, and it’s a declination form of COVID-19 vaccine for public safety professionals. They literally want you to sign this thing if you are declining the vaccine, and currently about 30% of the nurses in our local hospital have declined. So here’s what it says. “The Maine CDC, Maine EMF, recommend that I receive the COVID-19 vaccination to protect myself, my patients, my clients, my colleagues, and others in my community. I acknowledge that I am aware of the following facts. Please read and initial next to each statement.” Mary Holland sent this to us because Mary helped us try to overturn the vaccine mandates in our state, and I testified against that and so did people like Larry Palevsky. There’s not a single fact here, not one.

Dr. Christiane Northrup: “COVID-19 is a serious respiratory disease. As of December 16, 2020, over 300,000 people have died in the US. There have been over 16 million people with confirmed cases of COVID-19.” You have just learned from Dr. Rasnick that a positive PCR test is absolutely worthless. “COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for me and all other public safety professionals to protect our colleagues and the communities that we serve from COVID-19, its complications, and death.” You’ve already learned tonight that none of that is true. Here is another. “If I contract COVID-19, I may remain infectious for 10 days or more. During this time, I shed the virus and can transmit COVID-19 to my family, colleagues, and the people we serve.”

Dr. Christiane Northrup: We don’t know that. “If I become infected with COVID-19, even if my symptoms are mild or non-existent, I can spread COVID-19 to others. Symptoms that are mild or non-existent in me may cause serious illness and death in others.” Now this has been the narrative all along. “Wear a mask to protect others,” or as one of my friends says, who works in the vaccine informed consent space, “I get it. You want me to give my kid 69 mandated vaccines, you want me to set my kid on fire to make your kid warm.” This is the whole narrative that we have been taught. But here’s what I want you all to know, because the news is really good. I would not know Maureen, Kevin Jenkins, Curtis Cost, Dave Rasnick, Larry Palevsky. I knew Larry because we were both members of the American Holistic Medical Association, but I never knew the Larry that could so eloquently give a testimony to the legislature in Hartford, in New York.

Dr. Christiane Northrup: What I learned is, if you think you’re gonna get anywhere lobbying your politicians, forget it. I feel like when you go there you realize they’re not listening to anything, they’re already puppets of someone else. So what we must do is what we’re doing here tonight. We are using alternative methods to get to know each each other. We are rising, I became a member of Millions Against Medical Mandates. I now know and love these people through Zoom. We are finding each other. It’s almost like we’re growing a new species. And I heard this long ago, a new species, Homo Spiritus or Homo Luminous, under pressure and under heat, we humans rise. I just watched Starman from 1984 and where Jeff Bridges says, “You humans are a very weird species, but you’re at your best when things get really bad.”

Dr. Christiane Northrup: And right now, things are really bad and yet we are finding each other with a network of light all over the planet. I have met Dolores Cahill from Ireland. I know now people all over the world in an intimate, wonderful way, because from the very beginning, I said, “Something is wrong with this narrative,” and I noticed how often such simple things like vitamin D were censored right away. When you question masks, Russell Blaylock’s article on masks way back, world famous neurosurgeon, was censored immediately. So here’s what I know, if it is censored immediately, that’s where the truth is. If it’s censored immediately, you are over the target.

Dr. Christiane Northrup: So all of you listening tonight, you have had the courage to open your hearts and then I also wanna say how my heart goes out to those of you who have family members who, no matter what you say, are gonna go ahead and get this thing, whatever it is. It is a time we are saying goodbye to our old way of life and I believe that we are moving in to one of the most exciting times on planet Earth. Thank you.

Maureen McDonnell: Thank you, Dr. Northrup, really appreciate that perspective. And I just wanna encourage everyone to share this video, it is being recorded, it will be on the CHD website, it’ll be on the MAMM website. They want the science? We’ve got it. If they want the stats and the facts, we have it. They want the big picture? You just heard it. So no more suppression of the truth. We’re the truth sharers and the truth tellers and it’s our responsibility, once we know the truth, to share it with others. So really encourage you to take this video into all your networks and share it widely. So now Curtis will introduce Michael Kane.

Curtis Cost: Right. I just wanna make one quick comment about about Dr. Christiane Northrup’s comments about we have to develop our own networks. I remember when we first were having meetings about how we were going to position this event and the name we were gonna call it, and there were concerns about using the word vaccine in it because fear of censorship. And I remember I made the point, I said, “Look, they’re gonna censor us no matter what. We gotta be bold. We have to go out and create our own networks and figure out to be able to put things out and they can’t stop us.” And look what we’ve done. In the space of a week, we’ve got what, close to 50,000 people? And if we had another week, we’d probably have 100,000. So I just wanna make that point. I think Dr. Northrup made a great point that’s important. Michael Kane is a teacher and he works heavily with the teachers union and other unions fighting for the rights of teachers not to have medical mandates forced upon them. He’s a brilliant writer, brilliant researcher, very big activist, and overall very nice person. And so, further ado, turn it over to Michael Kane.

Michael Kane: Thank you so much, Curtis. I’m gonna take this in a little different direction. You just heard from a lot of brilliant scientific and legal minds. My name is Michael Kane. I’m a New York City public school teacher, and I’m a proud United Federation of Teachers Union member for over 13 years now. I’m also the founder of New York Teachers For Choice, an emergency union caucus that is 100% opposed to medical mandates for anyone to keep their jobs, especially educators. Tonight, I wanna ask Randi Weingarten, the president of my national union, which is the American Federation of Teachers or AFT, to rescind her statements from September of 2020 where she called for the forced vaccination of teachers to keep our jobs.

Michael Kane: Due to the efforts of New York Teachers For Choice, we recently got Michael Mulgrew, president of the powerful New York City Local Teachers Union, the UFT, my local union, to publicly state, “Vaccination is an individual choice for each teacher to make.” We greatly thank Mr. Mulgrew for that statement. However, when one of the COVID vaccines are finally fully FDA-approved, can we trust we won’t be force vaccinated to keep our jobs? Just as AFT President Randi Weingarten called for back in September. I respectfully ask Miss Weingarten to retract her position that educators should be force vaccinated to keep our jobs. This demand is one of seven demands that Teachers For Choice has of our union leaders. If these demands are not met on March 1st, 2021, teachers all across New York state will begin the process of stopping paying union dues and divert that money into an emergency health defense fund in preparation for lawsuits against medical mandates for teachers to keep our jobs.

Michael Kane: We do not want to stop paying union dues, we are not union busters, but we will not be ignored. COVID vaccination is just the canary in the coal mine, as there are multiple additional medical mandates that have already been put in place or attempted to be put in place for workers all across the world to keep our jobs. Such mandates include the following. In 2018, the brave teachers of West Virginia went on strike when they were mandated to wear FitBits to monitor their activities to determine the insurance premiums for their medical coverage. Today in France, factory workers are being made to wear devices that beep when they come within six feet of another worker as if they are cattle. In Michigan, there is a bill called the Microchip Protection Act, which is said to prevent employers from requiring a sub-dermal microchip implant for employees to keep their job.

Michael Kane: This sounds like a good bill, but buried in the weeds of that bill it says, “Unless a court orders it.” Why would any court in America order a microchip implant for any person to keep their job? And of course, there is the recent mandatory COVID testing happening in New York City schools for both staff and students. Now in regards to the in-school COVID testing, Teachers For Choice sued the New York City Department of Education with our attorney Michael Sussman, and won a court-ordered stipulation ensuring our specimens will be destroyed and will not be used for anything other than getting a positive or negative COVID result. And now, the good people of Children’s Health Defense are suing New York City in Federal court arguing that mandatory COVID testing is illegal, immoral, and unscientific, in the case Aviles vs de Blasio.

Michael Kane: You can learn more about Teachers For Choice at our website nyteachersforchoice.org. That’s all one word, no numbers, nyteachers, F-O-R, choice.org. There you will find a link to a petition called NY Teachers Against Vaccine Mandates for Educators that today has over 17,000 signatures. Please show your support to teachers, educators, and workers across the world resisting medical mandates by signing that petition right now. You will also find our most important reports linked from our homepage and you can go to our contact page and send us a quick email to join our email list. It’s a simple website. Really, it’s just a blog, because we’re broke. We have no money. But we don’t need any money and we are not asking for any money. All we ask for is your support, so spread the word.

Michael Kane: No forced COVID vaccination for teachers or students, no forced flu shots for teachers or students. As I’ve already said, this is about much more than COVID-19. All the workers of America and across the world, especially my fellow union brothers and sisters, we must come together and resist all medical mandates now. And if your leaderships of your union won’t resist with you, pressure them or get rid of them. My name is Michael Kane, founder of New York Teachers For Choice. Thank you so much. Have a good night. God bless.

Curtis Cost: Thank you, Michael. Fantastic. We definitely need to get the unions involved and help them understand the seriousness of these issues in standing for their rights and joining forces with the rest of us. The next person I’m gonna introduce is John Gilmore. John Gilmore is the founder of the Autism Action Network. He fights for parental rights, he’s organized many demonstrations, especially in Albany, New York fighting for parental rights. And he’s a great speaker and very committed. And if you’re ready… John, are you there? Okay. You’re on.

John Gilmore: Alright. Okay. Thank you, Curtis. We’re living in extraordinary times, and we’re also living in dangerous times. With the advent of COVID-19, it is obvious to everyone that big pharma, big media, big tech and big government have coalesced into a tightly interlocked oligarchy unprecedented in American history, or world history for that matter. And the oligarchy has insatiable desire for power. It seeks to control everything: What we see, what we say, what we think, what we buy, what happens to our bodies. And they want to force you to inject COVID-19 shots into your body and to your children’s bodies, but we aren’t going to let that happen.

John Gilmore: Tonight, I would like to share a few ideas of what you can do to fight the oligarchy and protect your right to choose. And this is not a new fight. For at least five years, there’s been a nationwide effort in the United States to take away individuals’ and parents’ rights to choose what vaccines they can and cannot receive. They’ve been successful in some states but they have lost so far, at least, in far more states than they’ve won. So fighting matters and fighting can actually work.

John Gilmore: The power and wealth of the oligarchs we’re fighting is immense. They’re worth, literally, trillions of dollars. And I would be surprised if the budgets of the entire vaccine rights movement is greater than $5 million annually. Yet despite that immense power and wealth, the oligarchs feel increasingly threatened by both the people on this panel and you, the people who are listening. On this panel today, we have ferocious warriors who fight every day for you and your family in the media, in the courts, in the state houses, in Washington DC, in our communities. There are many things we are fighting for, but the immediate goal for the next year or two is to stop any type of forced COVID-19 shots, whether it’s to go to school, to work, to travel, to go to a baseball game or a concert, or just to be. The people on this panel can’t do much without you folks who are listening. What you do matters and you need to be in the fight.

John Gilmore: Legislation is being introduced across America, and probably across the… Well, across the world, I know it is, to either protect your rights or force you to get the shots. We must support good bills and stop the bad ones, and here are a few things you can and must do to be in this fight. Number one, you have to register to vote and you have to vote. Voting matters. That became clear last November. Get your spouse, family, friends to register and vote but then again, only if they support vaccine rights, but spread out. Another important thing is you gotta come out of the closet. You can’t fight and hide at the same time. There never would have been a gay rights movement if everybody had stayed in the closet, and that applies to us. Get informed, stay informed. Get on the mailing list of all of tonight’s speakers and their organizations. And you have to stay in contact with your elected officials. Call them, write them, tweet them, comment on their social media, send them information, get to know their staffs.

John Gilmore: And remember, you catch more flies with honey than vinegar. Help organize a meeting in your area and plan political actions, and donate to the groups that are fighting for you. Now, the stakes couldn’t be higher. Your health, your children’s health, whether you can work or not, run your business, communicate with people who choose to communicate with you, your right to speak, write and express yourself without interference from Big Tech or government or Big
…

[Message clipped] View entire message