Golden Age of Gaia

Toward a World that Works for Everyone

/ Home / News / From Darkness Unto Light, 19 Dec. 2024 Update
post

From Darkness Unto Light, 19 Dec. 2024 Update

by

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

I believe that Pierre Poilievre, leader of the Conservative Party of Canada, has both the clear vision and backbone to negotiate with President Trump for trade and border-security arrangements that will enrich both our countries.

 

‘The View’ Co-Host in Hot Water: Alyssa Farah Griffin Caught Coaching Federal Witness and Known Liar Cassidy Hutchinson – May Face Criminal Investigation

Jim Hoft, Gateway Pundit, 
(https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/12/view-co-host-busted-after-getting-caught-coaching/)

The Committee on House Administration’s Subcommittee on Oversight Chairman Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) released a second interim report on Tuesday addressing the events surrounding January 6, 2021.

The report not only highlighted widespread failures but also issued damning allegations against key members of the now-disbanded January 6 Committee. …

As Cristina Laila pointed out earlier, Loudermilk obtained January 6 ‘star witness’ Cassidy Hutchinson’s Signal messages, which revealed she was directly communicating with J6 Vice Chair Liz Cheney in 2022.  (1)

Liz Cheney was communicating with Cassidy Hutchinson without Hutchinson’s attorney’s knowledge—knowing this is unethical.

“In the months prior to Hutchinson’s explosive private and public testimony, Cheney communicated with Hutchinson, both directly and through an intermediary—Alyssa Farah Griffin—while Hutchinson was represented by her attorney, Stefan Passantino. The Select Committee conducted six transcribed interviews of Hutchinson in total. Passantino represented Hutchinson for the first three interviews,” the Oversight Committee said.

Text messages were posted on social media showing The View co-host Alyssa Farah Griffin Cassidy Hutchinson was clearly tampering with the witness Cassidy Hutchinson.

Alyssa Farah had several text exchanges with Cassidy Hutchinson. They mutually hated President Trump.

Alyssa Farah was the go-between for Liz Cheney and Hutchinson.

(Go to site for rest of story.)

(1) NB: Liz Cheney is reported to have been hanged at Gitmo on April 24, 2023. See Michael Baxter, “Liz Cheney Hanged at GITMO,” Real Raw News, April 27, 2023, at https://realrawnews.com/2023/04.liz-cheney-hanged-at-gitmo.  I note the contradiction and have no explanation for it.

Here’s the report:

J6-final-interim-report

How would this fit with the new Q phones that we’ll reportedly get at our Reval appointment?

Yes! And see following article.

This article does not take into account the impact of weather warfare, such as the wildfires in Hawaii and Wyoming and the hurricanes in the American southeast. Perhaps factor that in.

The Paris Accords As “Climate Insurance”—Unaffordable and Unnecessary

Steven E. Koonin and Mark P. Mills, , Gateway Pundit, Dec. 15, 2024,

(https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/12/paris-accords-as-climate-insurance-unaffordable-unnecessary/.)

(Excerpt only.)

The stated rationale for proposals to alter completely how civilization is fueled is the need for an “insurance policy” against future climate catastrophes. In that framing, the climate-fearful argue that some possibility of consequential future harms warrants the “responsible” decision to “buy” insurance now. But this often-argued “insurance” construct assumes that we know enough to say that the consequences of future climate change justify paying for the insurance—and collaterally, that we know the “insurance” itself will be affordable.

It turns out that we do know quite a bit about both those domains. As we outline below, reality tells us that the climate-change consequences that we’re trying to avoid will be modest—and that the costs of the “insurance” are staggering. …

Next is the question of whether the climate threat is so dire that it requires precipitous and Promethean actions—transforming the entire world’s energy system in a few decades. The answer to that question is not as uncertain as the doomsayers claim. There is some guidance from recent history, since the globe has warmed 1.3oC in the past 120 years and about the same amount of warming is expected over the next century.

Rather than catastrophe, humanity has seen unprecedented prosperity over that period: the global average lifespan has gone from 32 years to 72 years, per capita GDP has increased sevenfold, the literacy rate has soared, and the death rate from extreme weather events has decreased by a factor of 50!

So, it’s hard to believe that a comparable warming over the next century will significantly derail such progress. In fact, the consensus of economic impact studies, as published last year by the Biden White House, is that there would be a few-percent decrement in the GDP for a few degrees of warming. That’s “in the noise,” as we physicists say. Of course, there will be differential impacts, there are uncertainties, and GDP isn’t the only measure of wellbeing.

Nevertheless, predictions of catastrophe are not credible.

If you listen to the popular media, you might believe that we humans have already broken the climate. Yet even the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) can’t find any climatically significant trends in most climate impact drivers, let alone attribute them to human influences.

Losses from extreme weather events are in fact declining as a percentage of GDP as the world becomes more resilient. And projections of the magnitude of future warming have decreased as the IPCC refines its models and the world emits somewhat less CO2 than had been expected because of both slower growth and a shift to carbon-light energy sources.