Revised and Expanded
I’d like to add to this post that various readers are asking me to publish the article of one commentator who is saying that there could in fact be a comet collision with the Earth and offering an approximate date. Readers are saying they find this article “interesting.”
Matthew Ward has said that “no celestial bodies will collide with Earth.” (June 11, 2011.) I prefer Matthew’s version to that of the commentator concerned (though the latter is very well known) and so I won’t be posting that article either.
My intent in saying this is to indicate that I do weigh your suggestions but I don’t always act on them and, if I don’t, even though other Internet journalists may, there’s usually a reason, sometimes one that I may not wish to discuss publicly to avoid splitting lightworkers in a flame war.
May I also remind readers that, if they wish to find out whether a catastrophic prediction is true or not, they may look at the compendium called “Ready-Reference Guide: There is No Need to Fear,” permanently posted to the home page of this site.
I feel the need to comment on a number of things.
I had not watched the third part of James Rinks’ three-part video before posting it and did not therefore see his allegations against Obama. I’m not familiar with where these allegations may stem from but I don’t put any credence in them. I have therefore taken the Rinks video down and won’t be posting more of his work.
Later note: This video continues to exercise various lightworkers around the Net, who are also Obama supporters like myself. There is speculation that the video reproduces quite a bit of what is essentially old news on NESARA to create a vehicle for rather over-the-top slander of the President. I’d be very hard-pressed to think that the President is guilty of the charges made in the series. There may be more word on the matter arising out of the discussion.
There are a number of rumors floating around the Net and I won’t be publishing the articles which contain them. I’ll refer to them here without naming the authors. My aim is to avoid a light war but nevertheless to address the allegations.
One of these is that Greys and Dracos have joined forces to start World War III. According to my sources, the Greys and the Dracos have not been around the planet for seven years. Moreover, according to Matthew and SaLuSa, no one can or will start World War III.
Matthew: “[Recent events] won’t lead to World War III. That certainty is based in Earth’s expressed desire that no major war ever again will occur on her planetary body, and your benevolent ET family on and off-planet will prevent any dark attempts to circumvent Earth’s wishes.” (1)
SaLuSa: “There are restraints [against the Dark] and we can for example refer to the divine edict, that no military power will be allowed to use nuclear weapons, or start World War Three.” (2)
A second is that Prince William is the Antichrist, an allegation which is supported by showing a photo of him holding a lamb and pointing the cloven hoofs at the camera. I asked Archangel Michael about this in my last reading and he said that Prince William is not the Antichrist or anything of the sort.
Some of you may say, “Well, he’s stil a reptile.” Please prove that to me. I’m a lightworker, not a lemming. I require proof before I damn someone with a stroke of the pen. Repetition of something is not proof.
Some of you may not find my assertion that I asked an archangel for verification itself to be not credible and I’m fine with your not accepting it if that’s the case. Discernment is called for with all information. I frankly don’t wish anyone to accept anything they’re uncomfortable with. Far better that we do that than carry around a load of information that we’re not really sure or have mixed feelings about.
A third allegation is that, if we board spaceships after Disclosure, we’ll be kidnapped, taken to Mars and enslaved. I asked AAM if this allegation had any truth or basis in fact to it and he replied “absolutely not.” (3)
A final allegation is that the Pope and Queen have been “summoned” to answer to charges relating to child sexual abuse and native genocide. The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS) is the forum to which the Queen and Pope have been summoned.
What we need to remember is that the ITCCS is not a court of law. It has no basis or standing in law. To the best of my knowledge it would not be accurate to believe that this “Tribunal” can subpoena the Queen or the Pope, try them, or bring down sentence against them. Of course, the ITCCS does not use the word “supboena” or the word “summonsed.” Instead they say “summoned.” To summon someone is not to be confused with the legal processes indicated by the words “subpoenaed” or “summonsed.”
To represent the situation otherwise or to write in a manner that does not clearly state the difference between the two processes and invites the public to think a legal process is involved that, in my opinion, could be misinforming people and could lack integrity.
I’m aware that some judicial and legislative processes in some countries have been undermined. But there are also elements of it that have not and I don’t consider the pure principles of the legal systems of most western countries to be themselves corrupt.
That having been said, I also support the work of Rev. Kevin Annett to expose a policy towards native Indian children that knowingly introduced them to white men’s diseases in residential school, cared not whether they lived or died, sexually abused them, buried them in unmarked graves, and threatened activists with death if they inquired into matters.
It isn’t Rev. Annett’s work that I take exception to. It’s more the way the tribunal’s work is being carelessly represented by journalists so that readers are left with the impression that the Queen and the Pope have somehow been legally indicted. They haven’t been and it makes us look careless and gullible to represent the situation that way.
Before I end, I also need to remind people to check out any story that begins by saying a special report on some subject has been handed to Prime Minister Vladimir Putin. In addition check any report that issues from the EU Times. Both of these telltale signs point to the report being from Sorcha Faal (i.e., David Booth). The simplest way to check that out is to go to Faal’s website, http://www.whatdoesitmean.com and see if the report is to be found there. If it is, chances are the whole article or a major part of it is fallacious. I continue to see a number of lightworkers distributing articles that hail from Faal and passing them around does no one any good.
I’m as eager as anyone to see the cabal defeated, obliged to step down and turn matters over to the Company of Light (the galactics and the spiritual hierarchy). But if we say things are true that are not true, we set ourselves up for major debunking and a loss of credibility. That to me is not advisable or desirable.
Whatever crimes have been committed, the Company of Light have painstakingly prepared dossiers on and will bring those concerned to the bar of the International Criminal Court where they’ll be tried according to the highest standards of justice, using evidence that is irrefutable, and receiving legal sanctions which are fair and just. Proceeding in that manner will leave no karmic residue and will yield a stable and permanent solution rather than an unstable and temporary one.
Whipping up frenzied anger against anyone, in my opinion, has no place in the new world that we’re building. I won’t be publicizing sensationalist treatments of the various matters we all know about and want to end (sexual molestation, genocide, World War III, antichrists, etc.). Justice is not served by extremism or sensationalism.
To be justice, it must, in my opinion, be even-handed, dispassionate, and careful. It must err on the side of caution. It must constantly be weighed against well-established legal principles, standards, tests, and precedent, not because there is something inherently wise in doing so but because it provides tests of the wisdom of the decisions reached by the court. Much good flies out the window when people whip up public opinion, no matter how worthy the end may be.
Because lightworkers are committed to redressing wrongs and defending the right, they’re sometimes “played” by those who know how to turn level heads into a mob. Justice can be derailed not only by black hats but also by white hats who have their own agenda, such as making a name for themselves or feeling powerful through causing a sensation. I can think of three lightworkers right off the bat who seem more interested in establishing their place in history than in being wise, circumspect and just.
If something sounds extreme, I’d question it. The really trustworthy voices, I think, are not to be found on the extremes, but in the middle, in a balanced weighing of things and calm deliberation.
(1) Matthew’s Message, April 3, 2011, at http://www.matthewbooks.com/mattsmessage.htm
(2) SaLuSa, June 27, 2011, at http://www.treeofthegoldenlight.com/First_Contact/Channeled_Messages_by_Mike_Quinsey.htm
(3) I’ve looked at these allegations in greater length here: “Comments on Kavassilas,” at http://goldenageofgaia.com/world-disclosure-day/disinformation-sites/comments-on-kavassilas/
(4) “About – Background and Rationale,” at http://itccs.org/about/