I’ve had a few folks write in on matters relating to sources. Please allow me to clarify some of the matters discussed.
There are not a lot of sources to choose from for news of current events and behind-the-scenes developments. From the higher realms, I can count perhaps a dozen that I’d take quotes from, mainly because few sources look at what’s happening on the ground on Earth.
If we turn to boots-on-the-ground or intel sources, wow, the group narrows even more. But I have to add that my selection is impacted by there being only me doing the work for me (other editors also lack assistance).
That means that I know there are other good specialty blogs, such as the ones Natural News publishes, but there isn’t enough of me to be following them, doing everything else … and writing on spiritual topics!
I consult four blogs on a regular basis. All lapse into flag-waving and adversarialism to a greater or lesser degree. (1)
But three of them still have such a wonderful grasp of overall, total, behind-the-scenes operations that I end up being drawn to them.
The fourth is narrower in focus (tribunals) but gets its information from the office of the commanding general. I don’t think the commanding general would allow them to report untruths.
In fact on one occasion his office called and reprimanded the author for a mistaken interpretation. So they are being held to the mark.
All of them are gung-ho. But the alternative is much worse. Where there even are alternatives.
I’m not aware of any alternative to the fourth one. (2)
As a sidenote, I’m aware that, if you click on the videos on one site, it takes you to totally-different, usually-religious programs. Big flaw. Nothing I can do about it. I’m as inconvenienced as you are. I apologize to you for the inconvenience. I’ve stopped believing the videos on this site.
And all the ads, often blocking the text on most alternative sites? Reading them can be a slog.
So I know I’m asking you to accept sources that carry some social baggage for one reason or another in the present climate of opinion. I only do it because I believe the benefits outweigh the costs. And I apologize for any inconvenience in using them.
***
Aside from those four, I also regularly consult (and appreciate) Twitter/X, Truth Social … not Telegram – too clunky and difficult to use compared to X. I end up taking a screenshot of Telegram and downloading/uploading the video, which is time-consuming.
X is much more user-friendly. Three clicks and the story is up, video and all.
Half my day is spent combing the Internet using these tools and producing the update. The other half is spent researching subjects and sources, writing articles, compiling books, answering email, etc.
There isn’t a research department behind me. Some day, after the Reval, if I can help it, I’ll see that there is one. Hopefully all the areas touched on here and on other lightworker blogs will blossom, where now they draw dismissive shrugs.
Working with an archangel, eh? Yah. Sure. Ascending to … somewhere? Really, eh? Aha. Gotcha. Well…. This is where I get off.
I do have one favor to ask. I’d like to be excused from posting articles that say that the Reval is happening on such-and-such a date. Enough is enough. It’ll happen when it does and we’ll join other sites in publicizing it at that time.
Fatigue from following what David Wilcock called “the Tuesday-Friday routine” has claimed its latest victim – me. Please allow me to excuse myself from this felt obligation.
I hope that addresses the question in the mind of those who may otherwise look askance at some of my current sources.
Footnotes
(1) I try to excerpt from them and leave the flag-waving behind. But sometimes doing that impacts the flow and sense of the story and I feel obliged to leave it in.
I don’t include in this list sites which are news aggregators rather than news reporters and commentators. I’m looking only at the latter.
(2) Why am I not naming them? I don’t want to incur liability, after seeing so many defamation suits being fought at the moment!