I asked reader Janet Poole to tell us more about the “Voice” Referendum in Australia, which she points to as part of a UN land-grab strategy.
We’ve already seen the use of directed-energy weapons and directed hurricanes to clear an area for acquisition by the deep state in Lahaina, Florida, and other places. Those areas are redeveloped as fifteen-minute cities. Is this a third method being employed?
Australian “Voice” Referendum Part of United Nations Secret Agenda
On 14 October 2023, Australians voted in a referendum about whether to change the Constitution to recognise Indigenous Australians by establishing a body called the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice.
Australians proved they’re awake to the hidden agendas of the referendum and voted No. Government, however, is now endeavouring to skip over the referendum result and move to the United Nations (UN) agenda anyway.
Once we start looking at what’s behind the Voice referendum, we see it’s not an Australian agenda, it’s a globalist agenda and is part of:
– United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) (1)
– United Nations 30 by 30 (“30 by 30 [or 30×30] is a worldwide initiative for governments to designate 30% of Earth’s land and ocean area as protected areas by 2030. (2)
– Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) push to “protect” 30% – 80% of the planet. (3)
The Voice referendum was supposedly about the well-being and rights of Indigenous Australians. However, as we’ll see in this article, it was really a plan to give the land to Globalists under the guise of giving land back to traditional owners. It included giving power to Indigenous executives whose voices would be controlled by Globalists.
The Voice referendum was based on the document Uluru Statement From the Heart. In the document, six of the ten guiding principles refer to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). (4 )
61% of Australians voted “No” to the Voice to Parliament referendum on October 14th, despite the huge advertising advantage the Yes camp had over the No camp.
The majority of Australians who voted “No” to the Voice knew that the Voice had severe implications for the rights of all Australians, giving over sovereignty to the United Nations.
The United Nations is believed by the majority of people to be a wonderful institution. They’re called the Peacekeepers. But behind the scenes we find the UN is an instrument of the New World Order.
Many will have a hard time realising organisations such as the UN, World Economic Forum (WEF) and the World Health Organisation (WHO) are anything but the benign entities they claim to be.
The UN, WEF and WHO are unelected organisations operating as a global government. We, the people, did not vote them in and they have infiltrated almost every country.
Many in Australia still do not know what the Voice was actually about because they were not fully informed by government.
They were aware though, that the Voice could not be trusted, in turn making it clear the Australian people do not trust government.
Australia isn’t the only place this is happening.
“The same modus operandi is being executed in New Zealand, Canada and the United States, and has already been used to plunder Africa.”
To many, the Voice referendum was about the government wanting to change the Australian Constitution to include an Indigenous voice. Except, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are currently as equally recognised in the constitution as all other races.
Section 51 (xxvi) gives the Federal Parliament power to make laws affecting “people of any race.” It is true that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are not specifically mentioned in the constitution. However, no race is specifically mentioned.
Giving one race an additional constitutional power of representation erodes the democratic principle of “one adult equals one vote.” (5)
While the Voice was made to look like it served the well-being of Indigenous Australians, “The Voice” was only about “Indigenous Australians” in so far as they could be utilised as a decoy by the United Nations to surreptitiously gain access to the executive branch of our Federal Government.”
(Continued in Part 2, tomorrow.)
Footnotes
(1) United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2018/11/UNDRIP_E_web.pdf
(2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/30_by_30”
(3) Council On Foreign Relations at https://www.cfr.org/article/goal-conserve-30-percent-planet-2030-biodiversity-climate.
(4) https://www.niaa.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-log/foi-2223-016.pdf
(5) https://constitutionalequality.au/why-vote-no/
Background
https://stephenreason.substack.com/p/support-for-the-voice-collapses-latest
Evidence of many atrocities under the United Nations flag – full report: https://www.bitchute.com/video/uqRIoxRxua1b/
The United Nations and the Rockefeller connection; the UN is “above the law”: https://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/united-nations-comes-into-existence-oct-24-1945-215020