Golden Age of Gaia

Toward a World that Works for Everyone

/ Home / Uncategorized / Mainstream British Paper Questions How Building 7 Fell
post

Mainstream British Paper Questions How Building 7 Fell

by

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
study-11

Dr J Leroy Hulsey

The new and significant thing about this story is where it was published: The Daily Express of London; in other words, a mainstream newspaper.

In all other particulars, it says nothing more than most of us, aware of the truth of 9/11, have known for years. But it may indicate that the press are now coming out from under the control of the cabal censor.

What REALLY sent it down? Shock report reveals 9/11 tower DID NOT collapse because of fire

By Zoie O’Brien
The building, which was situated next to New York’s Twin Towers, crumbled after the planes hit the towers.
Conspiracy theorists have long suggested “controlled explosions” were carried out in the building – but the official version of events says flaming debris from the burning Twin Towers flew into the 47-floor skyscraper.Tower 7, which housed the Secret Service, the CIA, the Department of Defence and the Office of Emergency Management, collapsed after seven hours of burning.

Building 7 was brought down with Twin Towers
GETTY

Building 7 has been at the centre of conspiracy theories since the Twin Towers were brought down

World Trade Center towers hit in 2001
GETTY

The Twin Towers were hit on September 11, 2001, killing almost three thousand people

Building 7 collapsed beside Twin Towers

GETTY

Building 7 is at the centre of a new report which claims the debris could not have brought it down

The National Institute of Standards and Technology insists it was the first and only steel skyscraper in the world to collapse as a result of fire.But new bombshell claims suggest “office fires” could not have caused its destruction.

It is our preliminary conclusions based upon our work to date that fire did not produce the failure at this particular building

Dr J Leroy Hulsey

The report, by a group of top engineers from the University of Alaska, insists the flames could not have brought the tower down.Dr J Leroy Hulsey revealed the team’s boss findings at the Justice In Focus Symposium in New York.He said: “It is our preliminary conclusions based upon our work to date that fire did not produce the failure at this particular building.”

The findings will add fuel to conspiracy theories which suggest the twin towers and WTC 7 were blown up.

Some have even blamed the US Government which they say wanted to provide the grounds for military strikes in the Middle East.

The World Trade Centre was brought down in 2001GETTY

The World Trade Centre attacks rocked the globe but also sparked conspiracy theories

Historically, skyscrapers have resisted collapse after fires.A skyscraper in Philadelphia burned for 18 hours in 1991 and a high-rise in Madrid in 2005 each remained standing following fires.There is no evidence of death in Tower 7 – located around 100 metres from the Twin Towers.