Credit: Dreamstime
In the furtherance of the return of civil discourse, may I discuss bias inside news reports today?
I’m finding myself feeling fairly constrained by so many sources today who inject themselves, jarringly, into their news reports. I’m thinking of intrusions of bias like the “lunatic judge” or the “despicable officer.” The news is news. Keep one’s personal bias out of it please.
In commentary, fine. Everyone has a bias and I go to commentary to hear opinion, bias, perspective.
I don’t mind it plainly stated above a story, as more commentary, as context to the story. I do mind it inside the news report. Just the facts, ma’am – please.
An adjudicator colleague of mine was fond of saying, I have an open mind, not an empty mind.
I agree. Our actual reporting should be factual and accurate, so as to leave me open to form my own conclusions.
***
I don’t think it’s possible not to have a bias. Mine is support for the plans of President Trump and his team, Commander-in-Chief Trump and the Global Military Alliance, BRICS (the alliance of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa), the GCR (Global Currency Reset), QFS (Quantum Financial System), Starlink, galactic federations, and, behind them all, the Divine Mother and the celestials.
It determines what stories I include in my update and you either resonate with that selection or not. If not, you probably find another update you do resonate with. Sites like X, Telegram, and Truth Social are themselves daily updates.
All that is fine.
But taking an unduly-moralistic stance on our perceived opponents in our news report is so often used to hide and/or justify what is essentially us seeking revenge.
***
In wartime the tendency to take those stances on our opponent increases – especially as we daily read of each new outrage of theirs (and nothing of ours). Breaking! Bombshell! Now Hear This! the headlines scream. And our ordinary everyday lives light up for a moment with excitement.
But it’s a slippery slope. After a while we lapse into judging whole peoples by stereotypes, preconceptions, prejudices, etc. And then the trouble really begins.
It’s extremism which is the problem in my view – of any stripe or faith. And being able to “identify your enemies” and have things sorted out in neat boxes is useful during conflict. It’s all the fault of (the left, the right, Muslims, Jews, whites). Take your pick. It all feeds extremism.
All this ongoing upset when the outcome of the resulting fracas has already been determined. It’s a matter of physics, as Matthew Ward tells us:
Wars, violence, deception, oppression and media censorship will cease incrementally as the dark hearts and minds among you leave the planet.
It can be no other way—simply, this is the physics that governs life in this universe. As Earth continues apace into successively higher planes, nothing with low vibrations in any form—physical bodies, subversive plans, theft, dishonesty, unjust laws and imprisonment, bigotry, cruel customs and deeds—can survive. (1)
Those ready to go further will do so. Those not ready will leave and continue their Third-Dimensional existence, the particular outcome being determined by natural law.
That doesn’t mean I don’t favor prosecuting the war against the deep state with all vigor. Between now and when the deep state leaves, many people could suffer.
Thus I support the Global Military Alliance, who fight to stop the torture and murder of trafficked women and children, the increasing control of the masses, and the impoverishment of everyone (you will own nothing and be happy) by the planet’s elites.
Let’s not forget their plans to depopulate the globe by any available means (viruses, vaccines, chemtrails, kinetic wars, weather warfare, etc.).
In the face of that, and in the heat of the disclosures to come (some of them, hideous), we can easily lose our balance. And then we lapse into extremism and everything we do harms someone and invites revenge in a never-ending cycle.
The answer is to take a stand on ourselves and commit ourselves to peace, love, and truth. Then to raise our own thoughts and feelings to awareness and monitor them, instead of following the herd, leaving it to the government, or whatever our bypass is. Finally, when we lapse, to return to our commitment, again and again and again. (2)
Footnotes
(1) Matthew’s Message – March 1, 2012, at https://www.matthewbooks.com.
(2) As discussed in “Ways of “Presencing” the Self,”