(Continued from Part 1.)
Archangel Michael is very tender in his love. After Dec. 21, 2012, when I was feeling depressed and conflicted, he said:
“I’m asking you, no, not as public figure, but as friend, before we even begin, to come and to sit with me in sacred union … to relinquish and to give to me any concern, dismay, despair, anything that is not of wholeness. I come this day fully prepared, my friend, to speak to you and to answer your queries.” (1)
On this occasion I also did what Spiritualists call “testing the spirits.” I asked him if he was aware of a conversation that another member of the team had just had with Grener. He surprised me by saying: “I am aware of pieces of it, yes. I do not eavesdrop on every conversation.” (2)
I asked him to repeat what he had heard and he repeated the conversation almost verbatim. But again his acknowledgment that archangels did not eavesdrop on any conversation was another insight into life on the higher dimensions.
In that same reading, I continued grumbling and reminded him that he had promised me his darshan (appearance) which produced this interesting rejoinder: “For my full presence to suddenly apparit [appear] would probably cause you to drop dead.” I laughed and said that that could have advantages. He responded: “Yes, it would. But that is not our plan.” (3)
Once, when he was discussing the tendency of lightworkers to do it their way, he acknowledged, again remarkably:
“Even with us of the archangelic realm or the angelic realm, there is the tug of war that always happens with the ego, with the delightful personality, the push and pull that says, ‘But I want to do it my way. I know that my way is the best way. You do not understand. You are not here. You are not suffering on Earth. You do not know what time-frames look like. You do not know….’
“We go through this all the time, and it is anticipated, it is expected, and it is part of the process of letting go and allowing yourselves to come into that full alignment so that the choices, the actions, the sense of connection is direct and with One.” (4)
There are innumerable angels in incarnation at the present time, numerous archangels, some seraphim and even some elohim.
I asked him if one prominent lightworker was an avatar and he replied: “No, but she is very enlightened.” I asked if there was a name for her type of individual – an elohim, a Melchizedek? And he responded: “You can think of her as an elohim.” (5)
Well, if I can think of her as an elohim, that seems to imply that there are rungs of evolution equivalent to the elohim that we don’t know about.
He discussed incarnated archangels on another occasion and outlined an instance in which an archangel had assumed a composite form, taking with him contributed elements from an ascended master, who was also the head of a planetary council. On the matter, he added: “An archangel can give energy [and] can hold energy.” (6) In the case in question, the archangel incorporated the energy of the ascended master with a fragment of his own to form the incarnate composite being or hybrid.
Further of interest was the fact that he described the ascended master as himself “a collective soul”! “There are various aspects to [him], even more than what you would think of as a singular soul.” (7)
He explained how the archangel “borrowed” from the ascended master for his present incarnation.
“Think of it in this way. Say that [ascended master] is a billion atoms of energy. Well, he has some cash to spare and so he shares it. So the incarnated archangel is carrying some of that energy.
Now what human beings don’t fully understand, you are beginning to and it is the Mother’s teaching that is helping with this and her gift of course of clarity. But in that single atom is everything – all the patterning, all the DNA, all the information.
“So when we say that the archangel has part of him, he has part of that billion, and so [the ascended master] is fully participating.” (8)
I once asked him why an incarnated archangel might not have any sense of being one and he responded: “Because they have agreed to be human.” And what do they give up by agreeing to be human? He replied: “Huge portions of memory.”
Was there anything else?
“Yes – and of course many of these qualities will be restored – but the ability for instantaneous creation.
“But their qualities will expand. That is what they have forfeited as it were – sacrificed, put on hold. The deepest connection and knowing of the unification and the presence of all – that is the greatest sacrifice.” (9)
Finally who would not want to hear the following feedback from their boss – that they would be in partnership from here to eternity? Can you imagine the impact on me of hearing these words?
“It is not just love that we share. It is service to the Mother. It is this unyielding, undying, eternal commitment to her service.
“And my trust in you is unwavering, that if we did not speak for a thousand years, you would know, not think, not feel, but know that I am right next to you. Sometimes I am typing. Sometimes I am moving your pen. Always I am whispering in your ear.” (10)
When in past ages have humans had a chance to know details like these about an archangel? When have we had a chance to work so closely and intimately with one?
We’re so privileged in this epoch to have this kind of contact, contact freely offered by beings who can be in a million places at once. And I think they want to be known – for many reasons.
They want us to work with them. It isn’t given to them to do all the work. If they did so, there would be no evolution, no development for us.
It’s we who are tasked with building Nova Earth and they who are tasked with encouraging and empowering us. And we couldn’t have better advisers and supporters as we go about our mission in the run-up to Ascension.
Footnotes
(1) Archangel Michael in a personal reading with Steve Beckow through Linda Dillon, Dec. 26, 2012.
(2) Loc. cit.
(3) Loc. cit.
(4) Ibid., April 10, 2012.
(5) Ibid., May 16, 2011.
(6) Ibid., Dec. 11, 2013.
(7) Ibid., Oct. 11, 2013.
(8) Loc. cit.
(9) Ibid., May 30, 2013
(10) Ibid., Nov. 21, 2012.