It wasn’t that she said something I disagreed with. It wasn’t that she left out anything important. Her words were exactly what you’d expect – even want – to hear from a Secretary of State.
It’s just that, coming from her, they were empty words. They carried no weight. I was saddened to hear such wise words coming from such a duplicitous person.
For instance, the Secretary of State said that the Wikileaks release was “an attack on the international community, the alliances and partnerships, the conversations and negotiations that safeguard global security and advance economic prosperity.” She said that “there is nothing laudable about endangering innocent people, and there is nothing brave about sabotaging peaceful relations between nations on which our common security depends.” (1)
But, in my view,Hillary Clinton has done nothing to safeguard global security or advance economic prosperity. As I see it, the secret government she is a part of is the chief terrorist in the world, the chief saboteur of world peace, and the chief threat to economic prosperity.
In early 2008, Matthew Ward identified Hillary as a key member of the Illuminati and their secret government.
“Once [Obama] is in office, some darkly-intentioned persons expect to control him just as they and others before them have controlled a succession of US presidents and many members of Congress.
“However, that vicious kind of governing is at an end, and contrary to the protestations of Hillary Clinton that this race is not over, she and other top Illuminati know they are witnessing the demise of their ‘secret government.’” (2)
Among the dirty tricks that Matthew ascribes to Hillary in a later message is trying to assassinate Obama the candidate.
“Some members [of the Illuminati] are not giving up their dream of world domination, and that brings us to the update I mentioned. That very brief overview is relevant because the Clintons, the Bush family and their closest cronies within and out of the current administration are powerful in the Illuminati faction that influences US politics, and Hillary is the choice of that clique to continue their control. However, other faction members wanted to end it, and voila! Senator Barack Obama suddenly was thrust into national prominence.
“Of course the faction members are unaware of his soul-level mission, but they saw him as sharp-minded, ambitious and charismatic, with strong appeal to voters who are clamoring for a new direction in government; so even before the beginning of the campaign, the fierce in-faction competition was underway. Obama has had to play the game of allegiance to the intentions of the whole faction—to rule Iran by installing puppet leaders and gain ownership of the country’s oil; continue conquest of the Mideast; promote poppy growth in Afghanistan to increase opium sales and promote more addiction worldwide; and do whatever else they deem necessary to become more powerful than their rival faction.
“As Obama’s popularity kept growing, Hillary and her core group remained determined to have her in the Oval Office, and elections were rigged to give her victories in key states. When she had no choice but to concede that Obama was the party’s nominee, her clique attempted to eliminate him in an ‘accident.’
“It wasn’t successful, and any other attempts to kill him won’t be either—a powerful shield of Christed light is keeping him one of the most securely-protected persons on the planet. However, both the assassination attempt and failure caused even greater dissension between this faction’s two elements, further decreasing the possibility that any of the Illuminati’s insidious plans will ever reach fruition.” (3)
If we did not have leaders like the Clintons, Bushes, Cheneys, and Rumsfelds, we might not need a Wikileaks. I look forward to the day when a free press again takes up the role that Wikileaks plays at this moment. Until the press sheds its chains, we need the exposes that Wikileaks provides.
How else are we to know the truth? Not from Hillary, I’m afraid.
Until the press is freed, Hillary’s words ring false, however true they might be in a different context and however welcome they would be coming from someone with integrity.
(1) Ewan McCaskill,”Hillary Clinton attacks release of US embassy cables,” The Guardian, Nov. 29, 2010, at http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/29/clinton-reacts-us-embassy-cables
(2) Matthew’s Message, 21 May 2008, at http://www.matthewbooks.com/mattsmessage.htm
(3) Matthew’s Message, 27 July 2008.