The end does not justify the means
In my article on Trump and the Alliance, I said I support “President Trump’s stated intention to ‘drain the swamp.’” (1)
I didn’t say that I supported President Trump in a wholesale manner. I don’t in fact support a lot of his words, actions, or programs.
And I don’t think he’ll escape being held accountable for them.
Moreover, I don’t believe President Trump has what it takes to bring the cabal down without intensive and extensive “handling” from the White Hats/Alliance. He is in fact, to my mind anyways, largely working for them.
I think he’s there to sign the important papers and not mess things up very badly otherwise.
The Mexican wall and immigration situation in general is a bad mess. The White Hats themselves may feel they have to swallow it until the wall can be torn down later.
And I hope we lightworkers after the Reval address the global challenge of refugees in a comprehensive and conclusive way.
The Alliance has the smarts and tools to bring down the cabal – ethically – (2) and they in turn are supported by people behind them who have even more ability to manage the affair. You know who that is.
Unlike the cabal, the White Hats obey and uphold the Constitution. As far back as I can remember channeled messages on the subject (2008), they’ve always been said to operate according to the law and the Constitution.
President Trump is important to them because he has the constitutional authority to enact measures that they – and accountability – require.
Nevertheless, I don’t believe the end ever justifies corrupt or exploitative means.
We lightworkers have watched the corrupting of the police, penal authorities, lawmakers, judges. The general public have not.
We watched the false-flag attacks and the erosion of constitutional rights, the use of manmade pandemics and toxic vaccines, the sequestering of life-saving technologies, the inflicting of torture on mostly innocent civilians at Abu Ghraib or Guantanamo. (3)
We anguished over child trafficking, pedophilia, and child sacrifice. There’s no justification anywhere in the universe for any of these actions.
But at the same time (and perhaps take a deep breath), in my view, we lightworkers are tasked to know and show by our actions that there’s never justification for hanging cabal members from the lamp posts or “taking them out,” etc., as some ostensible lightworkers are saying on other blogs.
Michael has counselled us a number of times:
“Many of the structures you have … have been constructed on these false human paradigms that were not real. … And they were not of love.
“They were of belief in the need to control, or to be greedy, or to be lustful, or to limit. … Many of your structures … have been based on a much lower vibration than where you would wish to be. …
“Never would you wish, as you move into an alternate reality, to duplicate that kind of structure.” (4)
In my opinion, we’ll have failed if we repeat the actions of the cabal. He says:
“I do not speak in terms of punishment. That is not of love. That is not of wholeness.” (5)
“The guidance has never been to repeat the actions of the aggressor. …
“When you shift roles of accountability, you do not wish to become the perpetrator. You just do not want to trade roles. So yes, there will be great latitude for compassion and forgiveness. …
“It is not the role of love to mete out punishment.” (6) [My italics.]
If what we propose to do is not of love, it won’t stand. It’ll create residue which will form the next wave of revenge-seeking and war. We require a good end and a good means – what some have called win/win solutions – to avoid creating residue.
We’ll defend ourselves against the cabal but our response will only use as much legally-sanctioned force as is necessary to stop them. Past that point, uncorrupted courts of law take over and decide how to proceed.
In my view, no end justifies a corrupt means in the world we’re building. Only the end of bringing peace to the world and spreading love universally among its citizenry will provide a stable foundation for building Nova Earth.
If we cannot actually experience love for the cabal, we can at least go through the intellectual exercise of answering: “Is this of love?” or “What would love do?” That, Michael has said, can serve as our litmus test for words and deeds.
As I see it, our task as lightworkers is to arrive at good ends and good means (win/win solutions) to build that new world. Comparing any line of action to love’s line of action is, in my opinion, a good start.
Footnotes
(1) ‘Trump? Have I Lost It?’ June 19, 2018, at https://goldenageofgaia.com/2018/06/19/trump-have-i-lost-it/
(2) And they’ve been at it a long time, working slowly and constitutionally.
Back in around 2009, the Navy took over Northern Command, including NORAD and the secret space fleet, Solar Warden. Northern Command, in my opinion, was instrumental in staging 9/11, the probable source of thermite used to take down the World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2 and 7, and the source of commands for NORAD to be training in Canada and unavailable/out of action to provide protection from the “hijackers.”
Further back than that, the Navy took control of the nuclear football from President Bush during the Georgian War.
Finally, I also remember a Marine unit mutinying in 2007 when they realized that they were being trained to invade Iran rather than Iraq, as they were told.
On general rumors of mutiny if the US attacked Iran, see Transcript: Alex Jones Interviews Col. Donn de Grand-Pre, U.S. Army (ret.): Explosive New 9/11 Revelations and Explanations,” The Alex Jones Show, downloaded from https://www.prisonplanet.com/022904degrand.html, 13 Aug. 2007; “What We Have Going on Amidst the Generals — Present and Former — is a Mutiny. It’s Not An Armed One, Not Yet,” Buzzflash.com, 15 April 2006, downloaded from https://www.buzzflash.com/editorial/06/04/edi06025.html, 6 Sept. 2007; and Michael Smith and Sarah Baxter, Washington, “US generals ‘will quit’ if Bush orders Iran attack,” at https://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article1434540.ece.
Opposition to the cabal has been building up for years now and their extremely-risky work is now coming to a carefully-orchestrated climax.
(3) There was no actual “war on terror”; it was a false-flag creation of “our side.”
(4) Archangel Michael in a personal reading with Steve Beckow through Linda Dillon, ibid., Oct. 11, 2011.
(5) Ibid., Oct. 1, 2011.
(6) Ibid., Oct. 11, 2011.