There’s two parts to this little exploration: New York City, and Britain.
Please forgive me for first focusing on this particular city and this particular issue (like I did here). It’s literally only one hour’s travel by car from my home to get into Manhattan, and that’s without traffic. I’m also half Italian, and it means something to me that I have a flipping actual Islamic fool as the mayor of a city I used to go to on occasion for interesting things: plays, restaurants, events… It’s been a few years now since I’ve gone in there for anything, and well over a decade since attending any kind of performance in the city.
I’m honestly not much of a city girl, anyway, but cultural enrichment can certainly be a good thing. I saw Patrick Stewart on Broadway in a one-man stage adaptation of Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol, both created and performed, in which he portrayed more than 30 characters with no costume changes or props. He’s so freaking good that you could almost see the other people on stage. That is not local theater. It was back in 2001, when Sir Patrick did only 8 performances at the Marquis Theater, with all proceeds going to charity.
I used to wear a suit to go to work in NYC, complete with panty-hose and hair spray. My commute into the financial district involved a short drive to the train station, an hour sitting on the train to Hoboken, a ferry ride across the river (because the subway is just too gross), and a brisk ten minute walk to finally get to my office. When the first bomb went off in the World Trade Center in 1993…that’s when I decided the money wasn’t worth all of that, and I gave notice.
But I digress…
The Italian American Civil Rights League on X posted:
“We are officially teaming up with the Irish Americans to SAVE what we built together ☘️ 🇮🇹
Our stories share so much in common, and we must now unite for the future of our nation.
We are pleased to welcome @MichaelDByrneNJ as our official Irish Delegate”
https://tinyurl.com/bpby82f4
This makes me happy, and it’s interesting to note that a common enemy does more to unite people than nearly anything else. We don’t even join together to weather difficult times in many cases, because survival becomes an every-man-for-himself kind of thing. We may actually be catching on that cooperation and collaboration is what we need to grok as a human collective before blowing this dimensional taco stand and moving on to the better story. It’s certainly required if we want to free ourselves from those who delight in weaponizing humans against one another.
Right click the image and open in a new tab for a better view…
Next up is Britain. Surely by now you’ve heard of Rupert Lowe. I think he’s a brilliant and fiercely unapologetic patriot, and I would Love to see him lead Britain into being a free and sovereign country for British citizens, and not for the invading army of migrants as it has been now for actual decades.
In fact, I’d love to see us adopt something similar here in the States. We already have a very powerful America First administration, but there needs to be some radical, emergency executive actions now to address all those living and making money here who actually loath this country and her people, and really only want to be parasitic clingons and transformers of our high-trust society.
Click the image above to watch…
Transcript
“Nigel, when we were both elected at the general election in July 2024, the five of us all knew that we had achieved something truly remarkable through starting the process of breaking the two-party system that has strangled and suffocated Britain for so very long. It was a special moment, and it was an honor to walk into that building as part of our group of five MPs.
I treasured that then, and despite everything, I still treasure it today. However, now in 2026, we’re in a very different place. The landscape has changed dramatically. Our differences over the last 18 months are well documented.
I do not agree with how you removed me from reform, but let’s not recycle those same arguments again and again. I want to move past that. The country we both love is changing beyond recognition.
Millions of people feel like strangers in their own communities. They work hard, pay their taxes, obey the law, and yet they see no fair reward for any of that. They see a patriotic right hopelessly divided. They see hard work punished and indolence rewarded.
That is why today I’m reaching out to put personalities and our past disagreements aside for the good of the country we all so want to succeed. To ask one simple question: How can we restore Britain?
If we agree on five fundamental principles, then I believe we can, should, and must find a way of working together in some form to make it a reality. Reform has taken a path that has moved its core offering away from what I believe is necessary to restore our country. On many issues, we agree. On others, we do not. But, I’m hopeful that a common way forward can be found and forged.
But, any agreement or or cooperation must be based on the following values, policies, and vision.
First, restoring our borders. Ending mass immigration is not enough. The hour is just too late for that. It must be reversed. As you know, Restore Britain has taken the unprecedented step of publishing the most comprehensive deportation policy ever produced in British politics.
That plan must be implemented in full and to the letter. Every illegal migrant must be deported. And yes, that must include women and children. Our plan has outlined exactly how that can be achieved within one parliament.
You previously stated that mass deportations are a political impossibility. Not only must mass deportations become a political possibility, mass deportations must become a political inevitability. They must all go.
Legal immigration has caused even more damage. Restore Britain’s policy is simple but sound. If a foreign n99999ddrdef98fnbh,ational is living in Britain, yet unable to speak English, refuses to work, lives in social housing, hates our way of life, or even wants to do us harm, they have abused our generosity, are incompatible with our high trust society, and they should be made to return to their own countries.
There will be those in Reform who do not agree with the robust nature of such measures, but I believe it is entirely necessary. Millions must go.
Second, restoring our demographic security. It is projected that white Britons will become a minority by 2063. Nothing demonstrates the demographic vandalism of mass immigration more than that. Importing millions of people from third world nations is changing our population in a way none of us ever wanted or voted to support. It is unacceptable, and it cannot be allowed to happen.
We must be unafraid to grasp that nettle, however painful the establishment backlash may be. Restore Britain is committed to reversing the Islamification of Britain, and that will not change. The level of influence that Islam is exerting even now on our Christian way of life is unacceptable.
Any future cooperation must include the banning of both halal and kosher slaughter. The burka, cousin marriage, mass dominating public Islamic prayer, Sharia courts, and any other barbaric, foreign practices that have no place in our high-trust society. Britain is a Christian country, and we must ensure it remains that way.
If we cannot agree on that, then there is simply no way forward.
The recommendations from our independent rape gang inquiry must be implemented in full. That includes the deportation of foreign national accomplices who were aware of these heinous crimes, and yet failed to act. I know you have publicly disagreed, and that this was the source of our previous difference of opinion, but it is a firm red line. If a Pakistani woman knew her husband was repeatedly gang raping a vulnerable white English girl, yet failed to act, she should be sent back to Pakistan. I hope her husband is not so fortunate.
Third, a referendum on restoring the death penalty. Axel Ruder Cabana, Hashem Abedi, Shabir Ahmed.
Keeping these monsters alive, and hundreds just like them, achieves nothing. The British people must be given a full, free, and fair referendum on the reintroduction of the death penalty for the most monstrous and undeniable criminals.You have opposed this previously, and that is why letting the British people decide is the right thing to do. I will, in that referendum, without a shadow of a doubt, be voting in favor of restoring a self-sufficient Britain.
Fourth, Britain must live within its means. That means controlling spending, cutting welfare costs, and making difficult decisions to bring inflation under control and restore sound public finances. It means a Britain that can power itself, feed itself, defend itself.
Restore Britain’s uniquely comprehensive policy papers are already addressing these challenges. To fund that, enormous cuts must be made. These choices will not always be popular, but we must be prepared to think in generations, not just election cycles. Govern by what is right for Britain, not for what will simply result in better polling.
Difficult, unpopular decisions are now required, not short-term politicking, but long-term hard planning that will ensure we leave a better Britain to our grandchildren than the one that was handed to us.
Fifth, restoring the country’s faith in politics. The British people have entirely lost faith in Westminster. That trust will not be restored by recycling the same ministers, advisers, and thinking that created today’s problems. Former Conservative ministers who failed our country and our people in so many appalling ways must not be part of any future cabinet.
They had their chance, and they failed us all. That must not be rewarded with a second opportunity. These principles of restoration will be offered to the British people on the ballot paper at the next general election, with or without your cooperation.
My sole aim through Restore Britain is the implementation of a properly considered policy program that will start the process of desperately needed restoration for our once great country. I do not care how that is done. I only care that it is done.
So, Nigel, my message is simple. If you are prepared to work together around serious policies, serious reform, and serious government, then so are we. Not because it’s politically convenient for Restore Britain. Not because it’s personally easy. After the events of the last 18 months, I would certainly rather not be making this offer.
But millions and millions of British people deserve a patriotic government that puts our national interest before any personal differences that you and I may have. If you disagree, that is your choice. Restore Britain will be ready for what comes, regardless.
I truly believe there could be sufficient common ground for our two movements to cooperate collectively to destroy the looming left-wing alliance that will finish off what hope remains for this country.
We have recently shown how effectively cooperation can work locally on the Norfolk County Council, so why not at national level? In my view, failing to even try because of our own personal difficulties is simply not an option. The British people deserve nothing less than our best and sincere efforts to make it happen.
Now is the time to put our differences aside and cooperate for the good of the country that we all love.”
Nigel’s disappointing response was a polite but clear non-acceptance of Rupert’s specific five conditions. Farage did not address or agree to the detailed policy demands, and instead, he invited aligned individuals to join Reform while reaffirming loyalty to his existing team, and framing Reform as the main vehicle. In other words, he just wants to be the boss, and his stated love of Britain extends only to how he can elevate his own power within it.