Epstein Island
For people who feel moved to pursue the subject, see Wikipedia, which has a detailed list with discussions here: “List of people named in the Epstein files” at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_named_in_the_Epstein_files. At least, they differentiate between people with non-criminal and people with criminal intent.
Here is the Epstein list of Public Figures
(Deleted)
Folks, after researching the list, I’ve taken it down. Why did I do that? Because…
The list does not differentiate between people who had innocent contact with Jeffrey Epstein and people of criminal intent. It does not specify what the contact may have been.
I’m not sure exactly what the list is of. People who traveled on the Lolita Express to Epstein’s Island? People who had more than casual contact with Epstein? People known to use his services? People in his “black book”?
If I were to go through the list carefully and critically, I’ll bet I’d find that half the people on it (Tom Hanks, Ben Affleck, the Obamas, Bushes, Clintons, etc.) have already been tribunaled, executed, and replaced by clones or stand-ins. (Affleck was shot trying to escape.)
We’re in danger of launching a witch hunt that could take in many innocent people. Already we’re seeing people leave their positions because they appear on an Epstein list. If they’re criminals, they should and will leave. But that should be established by a court of law, not by the press.
I see some Trump names on the list – Rubio, Bongino, Bondi, even R.F.K. Are these people to be assumed to be guilty of criminal behavior?
Remember the innocent lives that were ruined during the McCarthy anti-communist witch hunt (of the 1950s). I guess I remember that painfully because I grew up during it.
We can learn from the mob/herd mentality that developed. Or what are we calling it these days? Mass formation psychosis? Jingoism, sensationalism, and mob mentality seem to hang out together.
If this were any other age, I’d say: “That will cause our devolution.” But in this particular age at this particular time, it could lose those responsible a chance at ascension.
Meanwhile, I wager that nothing the Trump team does will satisfy Democrat voices. Rather than try to navigate that echo chamber, I’m leaving the discussion to researchers for whom it’s part of their mission and expertise.
I recommend Gateway Pundit, AMG News, and Gazetteller.
The list itself appears at https://www.reddit.com/r/RoyaltyTea/comments/1r5d3k7/trumps_admin_releases_a_new_updated_epstein_list/ along with a discussion of it. You decide.
It’s not that I’m not moved to post it. It’s that I’m moved not to post it.