In this important update, Mahyar Tousi reports on British police advising Tommy Robinson that ISIS has basically called for his assassination. Contrary to the position that any sensible authority might take, in the UK, you’re not allowed to defend yourself when attacked, even in your own home, and not even with a baseball bat. In the interest of staying alive, Tommy has opted to leave the country and take action to relocate his family.
Also covered is the emergence of yet another political party in the UK, but this one is rightfully patriotic, and is headed up by a farmer. Mahyar makes the unfortunately quite relevant point that’s becoming abundantly clear all across the globe: the Muslim way is to convert or destroy, and sometimes both…not to assimilate.
I will add a personal note here, too. A phobia is an irrational fear. There is a growing and indisputable body of evidence that says that Islam does not adapt, is not interested in peaceful coexistance, and in fact, the list of countries that have literally been culturally subverted by Islam is growing. There is nothing irrational about wanting to preserve one’s way of life. Nor is it unreasonable to want to protect oneself and one’s surrounding life forms.
I asked Grok for a list of countries taking an active role in protecting its citizens from the invasion…
Poland
Strong opposition to Muslim immigration; refused to accept Muslim refugees during the 2015 European migrant crisis and maintains restrictive policies. Government officials have publicly stated refusal to allow “Poland being taken over by Muslims.” Supports deportations of failed asylum seekers. No formal Sharia application, with secular laws prevailing.
Hungary
Adamantly refuses to accept Muslim immigrant communities; built border fences to block migration routes. Government promotes “Christian values” over Islamic influences, opposing Sharia integration. Actively supports deportations of irregular migrants.
Czech Republic
Publicly refuses to recognize Islam as an official religion and opposes Muslim immigration. Government views Islam as incompatible with national values, with calls for deportations of non-integrated immigrants. Secular laws explicitly reject Sharia.
Austria
High public opposition to further Muslim immigration (over 50% in polls). Policies restrict asylum from Muslim-majority countries; supports deportations for security risks. Bans on foreign funding for mosques and imams to prevent Sharia influence.
France
Strong secularism (laïcité) opposes any religious law like Sharia in public life; bans on burqas and niqabs. Restrictive immigration policies post-2015, with increased deportations of radicalized individuals or failed asylum seekers from Muslim-majority nations.
Belgium
Significant public opposition to Muslim immigration. Policies include deportation of undocumented migrants and those linked to extremism. Secular framework rejects Sharia in legal systems.
Netherlands
Political proposals (e.g., by Geert Wilders) for banning immigration from Muslim nations. Supports deportations for integration failures. Laws against Sharia councils or parallel legal systems.
Norway
Anti-Islamic political groups advocate restricting Muslim immigration and deporting non-integrated residents. Public debates on Sharia as a threat; supports voluntary or forced returns of refugees.
Germany
Calls for large-scale deportations of failed asylum seekers (many from Muslim-majority countries). Opposition to Sharia through secular constitution; recent closures of Islamic centers linked to extremism.
United Kingdom
Public support (around 50%) for stopping immigration from Muslim-majority countries; 2024 anti-immigration riots linked to these concerns. Policies for deporting criminal migrants; opposition to Sharia courts beyond limited arbitration.
United States
Under the Trump administration (as of 2026), expanded travel bans restrict entry from dozens of Muslim-majority and African countries (e.g., Iran, Syria, Somalia). Some states have laws banning Sharia in courts. Active deportation policies for undocumented immigrants and revoked refugee statuses.
Australia
Significant public support (48-49% in polls) for banning Muslim immigration; political proposals for plebiscites on exclusion. Deportations for visa violations or security threats; secular laws reject Sharia.
India
Citizenship Amendment Act (2019) excludes Muslims from fast-track citizenship for refugees from neighboring countries. Political proposals for banning Muslim immigration; opposition to Sharia in uniform civil code debates.
Russia
Proposals to ban Muslim immigration; restrictions on Islamic practices in some regions. Supports deportations of migrants from Central Asia (often Muslim-majority areas).
Sri Lanka
Deportations of Muslim preachers without proper visas or those preaching against local values; historical expulsions of Muslims. Opposition to Sharia in multi-ethnic context.
Canada
Explicit bans on Sharia in provinces like Quebec (unanimous vote in 2005) and Ontario (only under provincial law). Restrictive immigration screening; deportations for security risks.
This is not an exhaustive list, as positions can shift with elections or events (e.g., recent US expansions in 2025-2026). Many of these countries frame policies around security or integration rather than religion explicitly, though critics often view them as discriminatory. For Sharia specifically, most non-Muslim-majority countries inherently reject it through secular legal systems, but the ones listed have active measures or debates against its influence.