Not … completely … correct
Research notes are posts making a single point which I’d like to have in the database and on the record but which don’t warrant a full article.
I’ve quoted pieces of what follows but wanted to bring it all together in one place.
The archangel I serve (and I follow the path of service in this lifetime) is Archangel Michael. Yours may be someone else. Doesn’t matter. The same circumstances would probably apply.
What matters is knowing that sincere service to one who turns out to be a false guru is accepted by the Mother and/or the archangel we serve.
“Divine Mother: Does God Recognize Service to a Fallen Teacher?” November 3, 2018, at https://goldenageofgaia.com/2018/11/03/divine-mother-does-god-recognize-service-to-a-fallen-teacher/.
Steve Beckow: I’m operating on the principle – and please correct me if I’m mistaken here – that I serve Archangel Michael, period.
If I were to go to another medium and she was not channeling Archangel Michael and I were to do what was being said, and it turns out to be a colossal error, I’m still serving Archangel Michael.
Am I correct in continuing to say to myself, “The source is not what they say they are but it doesn’t matter. I’m still serving Archangel Michael.”
Divine Mother: You have reached this place of clarity. Now, dearest heart, this is exactly what I am talking about in terms of your divine knowing. And nothing is swaying you from that balanced center of knowing.
So it does not matter whether somebody says they are channeling Hilarion or Mickey Mouse. You know that you are serving my beloved Michael and I would like to suggest to you, Sweet One, not to distract you, but you are also serving me.
Steve: I so much know that, Mother.
DM: You always have. And so, yes, how we have constructed this is that you are employed, you are in joint venture, you are in sacred partnership with Michael, with Me-Ki-Al, and that is the way that you have chosen and that he has chosen and that I have chosen for you to proceed.
Steve: Yes, Mother. Thank you for confirming that.
DM: Let us give you further insight into this. If you were channeling with somebody and they said it was Hilarion, and in fact it was Hilarion, understand on our side the conjoining is so much stronger [with Michael] that Michael would simply funnel through Hilarion what needs to be said.
Steve: Interesting!
I now approach a channeling with a new figure with confidence, knowing that it will be Michael in the end, pushing the words through.