Also: https://t.co/w3huEaKPiU
— spotling (@spotling) September 14, 2025
Remember the “eyewitness” after 9/11 who “set the narrative” of an airliner hitting the World Trade Center and then boom the whole building collapsed? Is this young man, who grabs the microphone and says what he “saw,” setting the narrative that it was a shooter from 200 yards away who killed Charlie rather than agents stationed directly around him and one “spectator” (the shooter).
I’ve just heard information which changes my entire outlook on this situation. Michael Jaco explains and I’d rather leave it up to him.
OK, OK, he says the “assassination” was a dark plot, shanghaied by the white hats. He explains Charlie’s “death.” Conclusion: Charlie is still alive.
The information below this post should now be seen as a white-hat plot unfolding, if we follow Michael.
Hit graphic to watch video
(Or go to https://rumble.com/v6yxq8u-charlie-kirk-assassination-was-a-captured-and-staged-event-after-learning-o.html.)
Let me say this for now: I’m allowing events to unfold without forming final conclusions. As Elon said, the truth is never what it seems.
Phil Godlewski offers compelling evidence for the man in the white T-shirt standing immediately beyond the security guards as the “shooter.” Here is a montage of still shots allegedly showing the “crime”:
The killer aims the gun; the security guards give the signals
The killer fires
Charlie is hit
The security guards do not react but watch
You may wish to zoom ahead in Phil’s video to leap over the long runs of silence.
Michael Jaco says that Phil was part of the original Q team. But Phil says his access to information has now been stopped.
How about anyone reading this that has videos related to Charlie’s shooting, if even remotely, getting in touch with him? His home site on Rumble is https://rumble.com/c/PhilGodlewski?e9s=src_v1_cbl. Or with Candace Owens, at https://candaceowens.com/connect/
Yea it seems like an Intel led assassination, this guy gets around a bit pic.twitter.com/m8Sq5KIjW2
— 𝘉𝘪𝘨𝘉𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘍𝘪𝘭𝘦𝘴 (@DystopiaDecoded) September 15, 2025
Pointing out shooter’s associates and what they are hand-signaling or otherwise doing.
Definitely not 30-60 [30.06?]
[Was] .22-250
Bolt action is very common
The round is basically a .223
But shoots flatter
Punches harder
is more accurate than the .223
But
Green calls ready up sniper team
Red is using an infrared Lazer pointer
Yellow calls target read,
fire when ready pic.twitter.com/zoafHAYClX— CostonIsMyName (@TechneHouse) September 15, 2025
Thank you for posting this. I’ve hunted with 30 caliber rounds like the 30-06 and .308 my whole life. People have no clue what a 180 grain 30-06 round would have done to soft tissue of the neck. I’m surprised more of the gun community hasn’t said anything.
— Mrsunshine (@tossaway1980) September 15, 2025
And if anyone ever shot rifle or guns or was in military like myself plus 30-06 to neck sorry Charlie head would came clear off
— 🔴 TriggerFinger | 𝔽rAI (@TriggerFinGr13) September 15, 2025
