Gabrielle, Michael, and Raphael
I’m writing an article (1) on our work as lightworkers – but as angels as well. Or rather as angelics, according to Archangel Michael.
I was writing it to remind us at this critical time of who is here – that is, us angelics. Angelics, evidently, takes in all orders of angels.
I was discussing the seraphim with him when, as an aside, he made a statement about the archangels that had me catch my breath.
I wanted to include that discussion in the article I was writing and realized (2) that it should go in a separate piece.
It isn’t related to the turmoil. It is related to the angelics; that is, us.
It illustrates the situation with our knowledge of them … errr, us.
We know next to nothing about them – nothing reliable, that is. In one reading, Michael shredded the Biblical account of nine hierarchical orders. You’ve seen how he’s expanded classical enlightenment accounts. (3)
I have no idea how large the classes of beings are, as what follows demonstrates. I’m ignorant of them, eevn though they play a pivotal role in human history.
Nothing I know qualifies me from my contact with Michael, thanks to Linda, to say anything at all. I refuse to play the role of an expert, really, on any subject, but especially one like this.
Knowledge of them remains a thousand-piece puzzle. In all the readings I’ve had with Michael, there may be ten more pieces of substantive knowledge about the various orders, that we talked about. (4) That’s all.
So here is one piece of that puzzle. How many archangels do you think there are? And is that a relevant question?
Archangel Michael in a personal reading with Steve Beckow through Linda Dillon, Aug. 5, 2020.
Steve: How many archangels are there?
Archangel Michael: You want an actual number? Because do not forget that we are known by many names.
Steve: … A ballpark number?
AAM: Yes, a ballpark would be 144.
Steve: No! Is that all?
AAM: Do you underestimate our abilities, dear heart?
[They’re called “the Mighty Ones,” after all. Dare I ruffle the feathers of an Archangel?] (4)
Steve: No, but I thought there were thousands if not millions of you.
AAM: No.
Steve: Well, I’ll be. It will probably take me a month to assimilate that.
(Concluded in Part 2, below.)
Footnotes
(1) “How Many Archangels Are There? – Part 1/2,” January 20, 2022, at https://goldenageofgaia.com/?p=331263.
(2) A minor realization but a realization nonetheless. I can’t pass by the opportunity to mention: Realization or realized knowledge falls on a spectrum from minor to major. Enlightenment is a major realization. An “Aha!” is a minor.
(3) Steve Beckow: It’s very different from classical theory.
Archangel Michael: Classical theory has served you well. Now you are on a new course. (Archangel Michael in a personal reading with Steve Beckow through Linda Dillon, Feb. 20, 2018.)
(4) An example would be an aside he made about the Dominions once and how they were helping corporations become more ethical. (And they have their work cut out for them, I say.)
But this is an example of a substantive piece of knowledge in the thousand-piece puzzle. It also shows how few reliable pieces we have.
“Substantive” refers to the domain of spiritual knowledge, which includes but is not limited to the domain of empirical-materialist knowledge.
(4) Steve Beckow: Are you okay with the four-part article on ignition?
Archangel Michael: Yes.
Steve: Okay. I didn’t know if I was being too familiar.
AAM: You know what? We want you to be familiar.
Steve: Okay, I get that. Thank you. (Ibid., Jan. 3, 2017.)
