By now we may be seeing that the vaccines are intended to create a vehicle for mind control, for eliminating the immune system, and for killing on a mass scale – that is, to depopulate the globe and render the survivors controllable.
In my opinion, the Covid vaccine is a bioweapon and a weapon of mass destruction. It’s our job, I think, to put a stop to it asap.
And we will – gradually, peacefully, and legally.
It can be hard to know who are genuine protesters and who are the cabal-sponsored color revolutions – especially in the heat of the moment.
Remember: The cabal has been doing this for generations. They financed both sides of World War II. The Bushes help finance the Nazis. (1) Ford Motor Company built tanks for the Nazis before the war.
In terms of citizen protests, we know that agents provocateurs are used to incite police intervention. The cabal organized the January 6 riots; look how many people still believe it was Trump supporters.
Without word from someone like Simon Parkes or Charlie Ward, who have sources that know, it may be difficult at times to tell which side protesters are on.
So use your discernment in reading stories of “national” uprisings and color revolutions. That having been said, these events are still newsworthy. (We’re caught between a rock and a hard place.)
Footnotes
(1) “Did the Bush Family Fund Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party?” Veterans Today, July 2, 2007, at https://www.veteranstodayarchives.com/2007/07/02/did-the-bush-family-fund-adolf-hitler-and-the-nazi-party/
Is this a genuinely-popular revolution or agents provocateurs? How is it that so many police were immediately available? Notice the angle of the video and the location of other journalists: Both are from behind police lines. However no police are herding the press away, as usually happens – as if the police are not interested in them. Was the video made by the authorities? Was the demonstration staged? Are the press serving the government?
The write-up that follows seems like a hit piece against ant-vaxxers. Read with discernment as a good example of deep-state journalism.
Covid pass protesters attempt to breach parliament (VIDEOS)
Demonstration against anti-coronavirus restrictions escalated into scuffles outside Bulgaria’s legislature
Bulgarian police have foiled an attempt by demonstrators protesting the enduring anti-coronavirus restrictions to breach the national parliament. The scuffles left four officers injured and saw several protesters detained.
Hundreds of people gathered outside the Bulgarian parliament building in the capital, Sofia, on Wednesday.
The protest, staged by the nationalist Vazrazhdane (Revival) party, decried the standing anti-coronavirus restrictions, including the green pass system put in place by the country’s authorities.
The protesters were seen carrying Bulgarian flags and placards reading “I want a normal life,” “Hands off our children” and so on. The crowd chanted “Freedom, freedom,” as well as other slogans.
The rally descended into scuffles against law enforcement officers as the crowd tried to breach the parliament building, pushing away the police line guarding it. Protesters were unable to enter, as its doors were locked and barricaded with tables from the inside by the parliament’s security.
The botched attempt to breach the legislature reportedly prompted minor scuffles inside the building as well. An MP with the Vazrazhdane party reportedly tried to remove the tables and unlock the doors to let the protesters in, arguing that the crowd was within its rights to enter the parliament.
The scuffles outside the building left four police officers injured, according to the country’s Ministry of Interior. Several protesters were detained during the incident, footage from the scene suggests.
The protest has been acknowledged by the country’s Prime Minister, Kiril Petkov, who said he would have been “happy” to go to parliament square to talk to the protesters. The official was unable to do so since he is currently in quarantine after coming into contact with somebody infected with Covid-19.
“If there are people from their protest who are known to have professional qualities, we will be happy to hear their ideas for a more constructive way to manage the Covid crisis,” Petkov said, adding, however, that the health pass system itself cannot be dropped.
Since the beginning of the pandemic, Bulgaria has registered nearly 800,000 Covid-19 cases including more than 31,700 deaths. While the figures are significantly lower than recorded by the worst-affected nations worldwide, the per capita rate is quite high for the nation of some seven million. Currently, the country is enduring a new wave of coronavirus, with new daily infections reaching a record high of 7,062 on Wednesday.
WHO Joins EU and Changes Direction — Suddenly Warns Against Taking Continued COVID Booster Shots
Jim Hoft, Gateway Pundit, Jan. 12, 2022,
(https://tinyurl.com/2p929kj7)
On Tuesday European regulators warned that the COVID booster shots could adversely affect the immune system.
This was a huge admission for European officials after pushing booster shots just weeks earlier. What happened?
Then later on Tuesday the World Health Organization joined the EU and also condemned the continued booster regimen.
That was quick.
What happened?
What do they now see about the experimental mRNA vaccines that they did not see just a month ago?
In a statement released by WHO on Tuesday, it said, “a vaccination strategy based on repeated booster doses of the original vaccine composition is unlikely to be appropriate or sustainable.”
Via Alex Berenson on Substack.
Now the World Health Organization has waved the white flag on Covid vaccine boosters too.
WHO released a statement about Covid vaccines yesterday. It’s filled with the usual public health jargon and ass-covering, but one line stands out:
a vaccination strategy based on repeated booster doses of the original vaccine composition is unlikely to be appropriate or sustainable.
It’s over, people.
Aside from a few unlucky Israelis, no one is going to receive a fourth dose of the original vaccine; everyone with eyes can see it doesn’t work against Omicron. (And if you haven’t gotten a third dose, at this point, why would you? You are getting at most weeks of marginally improved protection for potentially severe side effects.)
Instead the WHO is now promising/demanding vaccines based on whatever the dominant Sars-Cov-2 strain is at the moment.
That promise is as empty as all the others the health bureaucrats and vaccine companies have made.
At least five major variants (“variants of concern”) have developed in the last year, and two have become globally dominant. Even the mRNA vaccines cannot be cooked up and delivered fast enough to match whatever strain of virus becomes dominant. Covid is faster than the scientists.
Premier of the Canadian Province of Saskatchewan Comes Out Against Lockdowns
The momentum builds.
Saskatchewan Premier @PremierScottMoe slams lockdowns indicating they cause economic, social and psychological harm as well as infringe on rights & freedoms with little benefit. pic.twitter.com/QcLupZMWqQ
— Rowan (@canmericanized) January 12, 2022
For Reflection
(The longer pieces appear here.)
Veritas Documents Reveal DC Bureaucrats Had Evidence Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine Were Effective in Treating COVID — BUT HID THIS FROM PUBLIC
Jim Hoft, Gateway Pundit, Jan. 12, 2022
(https://tinyurl.com/3mmkztv2)
Medical Experts Reveal the Scientific Reason Why Covid Vaccines Cannot ‘Stop the Spread’ or Prevent Infection
Kyle Becker, Becker News, Jan. 6, 2022
(https://beckernews.com/medical-experts-reveal-the-scientific-reason-why-covid-vaccines-cannot-stop-the-spread-or-prevent-infection-43621/)
It’s a lie that Americans were told repeatedly in the all-out government and media effort to get every living being in the United States jabbed: “Vaccines stop the spread.”
President Biden himself told the known lie in October 2021, and even “fact checkers” wouldn’t back him up.
“We’re making sure healthcare workers are vaccinated because if you seek care at a healthcare facility, you should have the certainty that the people providing that care are protected from COVID and cannot spread it to you,” Biden claimed.
It is important to note that this was a deliberate lie to mislead the American people into taking the vaccines, regardless of individual risk. CDC Director Rochelle Walensky had admitted a month earlier that the Covid vaccines didn’t prevent the spread of the virus.
“Our vaccines are working exceptionally well,” Walensky claimed. “They continue to work well for Delta with regard to severe illness and death, they prevent it. But what they can’t do anymore is prevent transmission.”
The viral loads in the vaccinated and unvaccinated proved to be similar, as the CDC stated in a document released in July.
“Today, some of those data were published in CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), demonstrating that Delta infection resulted in similarly high SARS-CoV-2 viral loads in vaccinated and unvaccinated people,” the CDC report said. “High viral loads suggest an increased risk of transmission and raised concern that, unlike with other variants, vaccinated people infected with Delta can transmit the virus.”
Since then, Covid vaccines have become major vectors for both the Omicron and the Delta variants. Indeed, in September, Becker News reported that higher vaccination rates appeared to correlate with more Covid-19 infections. This trend was confirmed by a Harvard-led study of 68 nations and 2,947 counties in the United States that was published in the European Journal of Epidemiology in December.
But the question remains: Why? Was the inability of the “vaccines” to stop infections or the spread an oversight on the part of scientists or was it an inherent flaw in the mRNA shots’ mechanism?
More importantly, was this a design flaw or did the vaccines work exactly as intended?
Two highly esteemed doctors have produced scientific findings that show that not only do these mRNA shots fail to stop the spread of an airborne virus like Covid-19, they are unable to prevent transmission.
First, let’s get the backgrounds of the medical researchers. Apparently, since truth is publicly associated with “authority,” especially among the scientifically illiterate, let us examine the credentials. According to their short biographies, they are quite impressive.
“Dr. Bhakdi has spent his life practicing, teaching and researching medical microbiology and infectious diseases,” the Doctors for Covid ethics website states. “He chaired the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at the Johannes Gutenberg Unversity of Mainz, Germany, from 1990 until his retirement in 2012. He has published over 300 research articles in the fields of immunology, bacteriology, virology and parasitology, and served from 1990 to 2012 as Editor-in-Chief of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, one of the first scientific journals of this field that was founded by Robert Koch in 1887.”
“Dr. Arne Burkhardt is a pathologist who has taught at the Universities of Hamburg, Berne and Tübingen,” the article continues. “He was invited for visiting professorships/study visits in Japan (Nihon University), the United States (Brookhaven National Institute), Korea, Sweden, Malaysia and Turkey. He headed the Institute of Pathology in Reutlingen for 18 years. Subsquently, he worked as an independent practicing pathologist with consulting contracts with laboratories in the US. Burkhardt has published more than 150 scientific articles in German and international scientific journals as well as contributions to handbooks in German, English and Japanese. Over many years he has audited and certified institutes of pathology in Germany.
The article then states why these mRNA shots are incapable of stopping infection and transmission of Covid-19.
“A fundamental mistake underlying the development of the COVID-19 vaccines was to neglect the functional distinction between the two major categories of antibodies which the body produces in order to protect itself from pathogenic microbes,” the doctors note.
“The first category (secretory IgA) is produced by immune cells (lymphocytes) which are located directly underneath the mucous membranes that line the respiratory and intestinal tract,” they point out. “The antibodies produced by these lymphocytes are secreted through and to the surface of the mucous membranes. These antibodies are thus on site to meet air-borne viruses, and they may be able to prevent viral binding and infection of the cells.”
“The second category of antibodies (IgG and circulating IgA) occur in the bloodstream,” the doctors go on. “These antibodies protect the internal organs of the body from infectious agents that try to spread via the bloodstream.”
“Vaccines that are injected into the muscle – i.e., the interior of the body – will only induce IgG and circulating IgA, not secretory IgA. Such antibodies cannot and will not effectively protect the mucous membranes from infection by SARS-CoV-2,” the article continues. “Thus, the currently observed ‘breakthrough infections’ among vaccinated individuals merely confirm the fundamental design flaws of the vaccines.”
“Measurements of antibodies in the blood can never yield any information on the true status of immunity against infection of the respiratory tract,” they add. “The inability of vaccine-induced antibodies to prevent coronavirus infections has been reported in recent scientific publications.”
In other words, there was never a time when any scientist could claim these “vaccines” could “prevent transmission” based on any empirical evidence. They either lied about claiming they knew that they could stop transmission or they deliberately designed the “vaccines” to be vectors for virus transmission in order to justify universal vaccine mandates.
Thus, while the scientific data suggest the mRNA shots being marketed as ‘vaccines’ may correlate with a lowered risk of hospitalization and death among the ‘at-risk’ segment of the population, the vaccines are not an impediment to infection or transmission.
Therefore, vaccine mandates and vaccine passports are irrelevant from a public policy standpoint. They do nothing but balkanize society, violate individuals’ health rights, and introduce more long-term medical unknowns for Americans who are not significantly at-risk from Covid-19 (such as those who are young or have natural immunity).