My thanks to Len, D, and Brian, the fruits of whose research make up these pages.
Notice that the announcement came out at the same time as the announcement of Red Castle to Green Castle.
Why is Jack Dorsey quitting Twitter? Social media CEO resignation letter in full
JACK DORSEY, CEO of Twitter has announced he is stepping down from the company – but why is he quitting?
James Gray, Express, Mon, Nov 29, 2021
(https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/science-technology/1528732/why-Jack-Dorsey-quitting-Twitter-evg)
Twitter’s CEO Jack Dorsey has announced he is quitting his role at the social media company, following reports of his impending exit earlier today. After rumours circulated of his departure, Twitter shares jumped by 11 percent. But why has he decided to leave?
Mr Dorsey co-founded Twitter in 2006, but after being associated with the company for 16 years has decided to step aside today.
His successor will be the current Chief Technological Officer (CTO) of Twitter, Parag Agrawal.
In addition to his now-former role at Twitter, Mr Dorsey is the CEO of his payment business, Square.
Mr Dorsey’s statement in full
“Hello team,
“After almost 16 years of having a role at our company…from co-founder to CEO to Chair to Exec Chair to interim-CEO to CEO…I decided it’s finally time for me to leave. Why?
“There’s a lot of talk about the importance of a company being ‘founder-led’. Ultimately I believe that’s severely limiting and a single point of failure. I’ve worked hard to ensure this company can break away from its founding and founders. There are 3 reasons I believe now is the right time.
“The first is Parag becoming our CEO. The board ran a rigorous process considering all options and unanimously appointed Parag. He’s been my choice for some time given how deeply he understands the company and its needs. Parag has been behind every critical decision that helped turn this company around. He’s curious, probing, rational, creative, demanding, self-aware, and humble. He leads with heart and soul, and is someone I learn from daily. My trust in him as our CEO is bone deep.
“The second is Bret Taylor agreeing to become our board chair. I asked Bret to join our board when I became CEO, and he’s been excellent in every way. He understands entrepreneurship, taking risks, companies at massive scale, technology, product, and he’s an engineer. All of the things the board and the company deserve right now. Having Bret in this leadership role gives me a lot of confidence in the strength of our board going forward. You have no idea how happy this makes me!
“The third is all of you. We have a lot of ambition and potential on this team. Consider this: Parag started here as an engineer who cared deeply about our work and now he’s our CEO (I also had a similar path..he did it better!). This alone makes me proud. I know that Parag will be able to channel this energy best because he’s lived it and knows what it takes. All of you have the potential to change the course of this company for the better. I believe this with all my heart!
“Parag is CEO starting today. I’m going to serve on the board through my term (May-ish) to help Parag and Bret with the transition. And after that…I’ll leave the board. Why not stay or become chair? I believe it’s really important to give Parag the space he needs to lead. And back to my previous point, I believe it’s critical a company can stand on its own, free of its founder’s influence or direction.
“I want you all to know that this was my decision and I own it. It was a tough one for me, of course. I love this service and company…and all of you so much. I’m really sad.…yet really happy. There aren’t many companies that get to this level. And there aren’t many founders that choose their company over their own ego. I know we’ll prove this was the right move.
“We’ll have an all-hands meeting tomorrow at 9:05AM Pacific to discuss it all. Until then, thank you all for the trust you’ve placed in me, and for the openness to build that trust in Parag and yourselves. I love you all.”
One region of BC that has been buried under debris: Cultus Lake, favorite excursion spot for Lower Mainlanders
Thanks to D.
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OA_frdp1lpY)
And rivers rising again in the Chilliwack Valley, BC., outside Vancouver.
Hit graphic to watch video.
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOWlyzVkn4U)
COMPARISON OF OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT REPORTS SUGGEST FULLY VACCINATED ARE DEVELOPING ACQUIRED IMMUNODEFICIENCY SYNDROME
Mac Slavo, SHTFplan.com, October 20th, 2021
(https://thealterofdeceit.net/2021/11/27/brace-for-more-tyranny-who-calls-special-meeting-to-discuss-new-covid-variant/)
A comparison of official government reports in the United Kingdom suggests that those who are fully vaccinated are quickly developing acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Complete immune system degradation (100% failure) can be expected by Christmas.
The latest United Kingdom PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report figures on COVID cases show that the doubly vaccinated 40-70-year-olds have already lost 40% of their immune system capability compared to unvaccinated people. Their immune systems are deteriorating at around 5% per week (between 2.7% and 8.7%). If this continues then 30-50-year-olds will have 100% immune system degradation, meaning zero viral defense by Christmas, and all doubly vaccinated people over 30 will have completely lost their immune systems by March of next year.
The 5 PHE tables below from the Vaccine Surveillance Report are separated by 4 weeks and clearly show the progressive damage that the vaccines are doing to the immune system’s response.
Weekly Decline in doubly vaccinated immune system performance compared to unvaccinated people…
If these figures are correct, then everybody over 30 who has taken two shots of the COVID vaccine will have lost 100% of their entire immune capability (for viruses and certain cancers) within 6 months. Those aged 30-50 will have lost their immune system in its entirety by Christmas. These people will then effectively have full-blown acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).
The boosters are only going to compound this issue. If you have taken a booster shot, these figures show that you are giving yourself an even faster progressive form of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (after a couple of months of effectiveness).
Table 2. COVID-19 cases by vaccination status:
Cases reported by specimen date between week 32 and week 35 2021 – https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1016465/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_36.pdf
Cases reported by specimen date between week 36 and week 39 2021 – https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1023849/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_40.pdf
Pfizer originally claimed a 95% efficiency for their vaccine (calculated as in the last column above). The figures above indicate that their figures may well have been correct immediately after vaccination (the younger age groups have had the vaccine for the shortest time).
But the figures above also show that the vaccines do NOT only lose efficiency over time down to zero percent efficiency, they progressively damage the immune system until a negative efficiency is realized. They presently leave anybody over 30 in a much worse position than they were before vaccination For more, see here.
Dr. Thompson said if someone told him to look at this lab; what does it tell you? He would say: “This person has autoimmunity.” The doctor hopes he’s wrong. But the data is far from comforting.
Do your research and make sure you know what’s happening. People are being coerced into taking these shots, and they are being shown to cause full-blown AIDS, for which there is no cure. Look into everything. Don’t just take my word for it. Please follow the links, learn, and understand. Critical thinking is necessary for the times we live in: the age of deception.
Here is Meryl Nass’s full article on Dr. Fauci et al, mentioned in yesterday’s Today.
Fauci Emails: How Top Public Health Officials Spun Tangled Web of Lies Around COVID Origin, Treatments
Meryl Nass, M.D., The Defender, June 4, 2021
(https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fauci-emails-top-public-health-officials-lies-covid-origin-treatments/)
Could four key public health officials have been intimately involved in the creation of the pandemic, as well as the prolongation and improper treatments used during the pandemic?
In early 2020, there was a lot of chatter about where the virus, later named SARS-CoV-2, actually came from.
In an excellent, detailed article written earlier this month for the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, former New York Times science writer Nicholas Wade described how two short pieces published in March 2020 — one in The Lancet and one in Nature Medicine — determined how this chatter would be channeled to the public.
These two extraordinarily influential pieces, each published under the heading “correspondence,” were parroted by mainstream media for a year. Both were plainly intended to shut down any discussion of the possibility that the virus originated in a lab.
Listen here as Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and I discuss these issues:
As I read both the Lancet and Nature papers in March 2020, it became immediately apparent each was designed as a propaganda tool. Neither was based on science.
I was so intrigued by these articles, I searched the web to better understand them. That’s when I discovered Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), who had blogged on March 26, 2020, about the Nature article, suggesting the article should put an end to conspiracy theories about lab origin.
Collins wrote:
“Either way, this study leaves little room to refute a natural origin for COVID-19. And that’s a good thing because it helps us keep focused on what really matters: observing good hygiene, practicing social distancing, and supporting the efforts of all the dedicated health-care professionals and researchers who are working so hard to address this major public health challenge.”
I wondered why five otherwise credible scientists would sign their names to the Nature article — and why Collins would endorse the article’s conclusion — when the arguments made in the paper were nonsensical, in my opinion.
I eventually concluded the authors had been put up to writing the paper by a “hidden hand.”
How had I reached that conclusion, even before Dr. Anthony Fauci’s emails were uncovered Wednesday?
Months ago, in another email drop obtained by U.S. Right to Know, we learned Peter Daszak, CEO of the nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance, was the primary but hidden author of the Lancet article.
Daszak was also the primary beneficiary of the article’s conclusion — that the virus evolved in nature — as his organization had been used as the pass-through to send money from the National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases (NIAID), headed by Fauci, to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, in Wuhan, China. (Some might consider this method of giving out grants as a fancy way of money laundering.)
Daszak , like Fauci, earned more than $400,000/year. He was also a member of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) COVID origins investigative team, and had been selected as the head of the Lancet COVID origins investigative team, which appears now to be dead in the water.
The WHO and the Lancet thus seem to be co-conspirators, choosing the fox (Daszak ) to guard the henhouse (the theory that COVID evolved in nature).
The release Wednesday of Fauci’s emails, obtained by BuzzFeed News through the Freedom of Information Act, help to further clear up some of the mystery behind why five well-known scientists co-authored drivel — which the venerable Nature journal published, and which was then used as the foundation to support the natural origin theory.
One of the emails strongly indicates Andersen, lead author of the Nature paper, knew he was participating in a con job. In a Feb. 1, 2020, email to fauci, Andersen expressed his own concerns about some of the “unusual features of the virus.” Andersen appears to be worried these features suggest laboratory tampering.
But Andersen then reassures Fauci these “unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (<0.1%) so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered.”
In another email to Fauci, Andersen thanks three incredibly important people — Fauci, Collins and Sir Jeremy Farrar — for their “advice and leadership” regarding the paper. All three are M.D. researchers who dole out more money for medical research than anyone else in the world, with the exception perhaps of Bill Gates.
Fauci runs the NIAID, Collins is the NIH director (nominally Fauci’s boss) and Farrar is director of the Wellcome Trust. Farrar also signed the Lancet letter. And he is chair of the WHO’s R&D Blueprint Scientific Advisory Group, which put him in the driver’s seat of the WHO’s Solidarity trial, in which 1,000 unwitting subjects were overdosed with hydroxychloroquine in order to sink the use of that drug for COVID.
Farrar had worked in Vietnam, where there was lots of malaria, and he had also been involved with SARS-1 there. He additionally was central in setting up the UK Recovery trial, where 1,600 subjects were overdosed with hydroxychloroquine.
Even if Farrar didn’t have some idea of the proper dose of chloroquine drugs from his experience in Vietnam, he, Fauci and Collins would have learned about such overdoses after Brazil told the world about how they mistakenly overdosed patients in a trial of chloroquine for COVID. The revelation was made in an article published in the JAMA in mid-April 2020. Thirty-nine percent of the subjects in Brazil who were given high doses of chloroquine died, average age 50.
Yet the Solidarity and Recovery hydroxychloroquine trials continued into June, stopping only after their extreme doses were exposed.
Fauci made sure to control the treatment guidelines for COVID that came out of the NIAID, advising against both chloroquine drugs and ivermectin. Fauci’s NIAID also cancelled the first large-scale trial of hydroxychloroquine treatment in early disease, after only 20 of the expected 2,000 subjects were enrolled.
What does all this mean?
- There was a conspiracy between the five authors of the Nature paper and the heads of the NIH, NIAID and Wellcome Trust to cover up the lab origin of COVID.
- There was a conspiracy involving Daszak , Fauci and others to push the natural origin theory. (See other emails in the recent drop.)
- There was a conspiracy involving Daszak to write the Lancet letter and hide its provenance, to push the natural origin theory and paint any other ideas as conspiracy theory. Collin’s blog post is another piece of this story.
- Farrar was intimately involved in both large hydroxychloroquine overdose trials, in which about 500 subjects total died.
- Farrar, Fauci and Collins withheld research funds that could have supported quality trials of the use of chloroquine drugs and ivermectin and other repurposed drugs that might have turned around the pandemic.
- Are the four individuals named here — Fauci, Daszak, Collins and Farrar — intimately involved in the creation of the pandemic, as well as the prolongation and improper treatments used during the pandemic?
For more background, read my two earlier posts on this subject from March and April 2020. I don’t want to take credit improperly for these discoveries — Dan Sirotkin noticed and wrote about the Nature article before I did, and wrote lucidly about it. I did not see his writing until much later.
Meryl Nass, MD, ABIM, is an internist with special interests in vaccine-induced illnesses, chronic fatigue syndrome, Gulf War illness, fibromyalgia and toxicology.