Leaving aside the various questions we may have about the Bible’s accuracy, (1) Luke quotes Jesus in Chapter 12: 52-3 as saying:
“For from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three.
“The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.” (1)
Is that not exactly what’s happening?
How many of our relationships have broken down or broken up because of some basic disagreement around political candidate, fraudulent elections, the pandemic, and so on? Are we not all really touchy at this moment – or is it only just me?
I’ve heard many of you talk about the wall of disagreement you’re encountering, This is not the warfare of movement; this is trench warfare. We are entrenched.
So how do we get out of this? The easy way is to go back to the last point of agreement and begin again.
But that may not take care of our entrenchment, as Michael suggests here. There is more to do, in the eyes of the Company of Heaven, before we do that:
Archangel Michael: So [what I want you to do lies] in discussing in the public awareness the various reasons (and we do not mean the political excuses, the power abuses) why this type of behaviour has emerged over centuries, thousands of years. …
It is abuse and control of the most vulnerable. So it is the descent into appetite. But where our forte is is, yes, exposure so that it doesn’t re-entrench itself because this is rather entrenched behaviour on all kinds of levels.
So you start to bring forward the justice, the truth solutions and it is not merely (and I say this very cautiously) forgiveness but it’s the application, yes, of compassion, patience, determination, vigilance … so that this does not occur and reoccur and re-entrench.
So you are speaking in neutral ways about the events that are uncovered, pointing to the deeper systemic, ancient situations that have contributed to this.
And then, you are pointing the way to the new because you cannot create a Nova Society where there is not an understanding, an agreement about what is acceptable in the most basic, human-rights ways. (2)
I’m leaving for another time a look at what he means by “an agreement about what is acceptable in the most basic, human-rights ways.” Mass executions are surely not included in that, but let’s put that aside for now.
“Exposure so that it doesn’t re-entrench itself because this is rather entrenched behaviour on all kinds of levels.”
Someone name me a decade in human history in which there has been no warfare? No one? That’s what he means by “entrenched behavior.” There is work to be done to stop human warfare, for one thing.
He does want us to discuss events for exposure to prevent re-entrenchment. But how to expose them without becoming part of the problem?
“You are speaking in neutral ways about the events that are uncovered, pointing to the deeper systemic, ancient situations that have contributed to this.”
And:
“You start to bring forward the justice, the truth solution….”
So going back to the last point of agreement needs to be preceded by something like a truth and reconciliation process. And it goes on in parallel with building Nova Earth, at least building it conceptually.
Perhaps going back could be the last step in the T&R process:
(1) Exposing the truth
(2) Building the alternative
(3) Going back to the last point of agreement and starting again.
What are we aiming to accomplish? To bring us all back together again when the transition has occurred, when the new society rooted in NESARA is ushered in, when med beds have restored people, when the energies lift to such a point that all we want to do is join hands again.
Alright. Father has turned against son and son has turned against father. Now that’s done.
Let’s now get to the end of the story and, when we do, lick our wounds, recoup our losses, and go back to the last point of agreement. (3)
Where were we before we disagreed? What were we doing? Saying? Let’s start anew.
Footnotes
(1) Matthew Ward, who incarnated as St. Matthew, tells us:
“Many people believe everything in the Bible is true because they have been taught that it is the ‘word of God’ written by God-inspired individuals. That is not so. The innumerable erroneous parts of the Bible include mistakes in translations of Aramaic and Greek records—one is ‘babe in a manger’—along with translators’ alterations that fit their personal beliefs. Those were compounded by more of the same in later translations; however, the most serious departures from authentic records are the omissions and additions that were deliberately meant to deceive.” (Matthew’s Message, Jan. 5, 2014, at https://www.matthewbooks.com/january-5-2014-2/.)
To illustrate, Matthew points out that Jesus met him in Matthew 9:9:
“And as Jesus passed forth from thence, he saw a man, named Matthew, sitting at the receipt of custom: and he saith unto him, Follow me. And he arose, and followed him.”
As an aside Matthew says that we was not a tax collector but a tutor.
The Sermon on the Mount, which Matthew was supposed to have heard and recorded, happens earlier, in Chapter 5-7.
If Matthew had not met Jesus at the time of the Sermon on the Mount, how would Matthew be able to report it? There were no newspapers at the time, no local libraries or archives.
(2) Archangel Michael in a personal reading with Steve Beckow through Linda Dillon, Jan. 18, 2020.
(3) On this point, see “Go Back to the Last Point of Agreement” in Steve Beckow, A Manual for Listeners at https://goldenageofgaia.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/A-Manual-for-Listeners-R3.pdf. We’re going to be called upon to listen. Here’s what listening means for me.
Hitting the UYRL will automatically download a copy to your “Downloads” directory.