Politics & Ownership: Is the Hawaiian Kingdom its own entity?
Stories such as these continue to give me much hope for the radical changes our world will soon enough experience! As we’ve acknowledged many times over here at Golden Age of Gaia, governments around our blessed world have been hijacked.
Through the birth certificate process, our governments claim their people as “assets,” basically human currency, and receive money based on the number of people living in that country.
Through sly legislation, intentionally ambiguous and confusing legal jargon, and secret behind-closed-doors meetings …our countries –and in turn their people– have been been participating in this system unbeknownst to us all.
Such legislation, as the Patriot Act, (2) little by little takes our basic sovereign freedoms and rights, making us more and more dependent upon our government –although we’ve never asked for our freedoms to be stricken.
Fortunately some countries, such as Ireland, Iceland, and those of the BRICS constituents, are becoming wise to the ploy and are actually creating their independence and life outside the current set up. Even states within the USA Corporation are putting their foot down and finding loopholes to the sneaky legislation pushed through –often without our awareness nor media coverage.
It seems some outsiders were apparently trying to pull off a “pirate act” by boarding a fishing boat and threatening those onboard in the Hawaiian islands. Subsequently, four fishermen who pleaded “not guilty” stood up to the outsiders: “Some Molokai residents are hailing four arrested fishermen as heroes for protecting their island’s resources from outsiders…. For us on Molokai, these four individuals are heroes. All they were doing was protecting the resources for our families, for our communities, for our island.” (1)
The attorney for said fishermen filed a motion to have the case dismissed based on “research and expertise of David Keanu Sai, Ph.D., a Hawai‘i political scientist, whose research is focused on the continued existence of the Hawaiian Kingdom as an independent state.”
The State of Hawai’i v. Lorenzo “case came on the heels of the United States Congress passing a law in 1993 apologizing for the illegal overthrow of the government of the Hawaiian Kingdom by the United States on January 17, 1893. In light of the admitted illegality by the United States, the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) stated in the Lorenzo case, that the ‘illegal overthrow leaves open the question whether the present governance system should be recognized.'” (1) Go Hawai’i!
It’s this type of shrewd legislation of which I speak. This reminds me of the Act of 1871, when earlier in world history, unscrupulous deeds were executed without the populace knowing it.
I believe we’ll be learning of much more illegal policies in place that we believe are legal and accurate, but really are not. Onward and upward toward our freedom.
1. State of Hawai‘i Judge Rules Hawaiian Kingdom Still Exists by Hawaiian Kingdom.
2. Bill of Rights: USA PATRIOT Act.
International Ethics: 9/11 cover-up perpetrated through the BBC.
Are you guys and gals aware of this event? “The fact that the BBC reported the collapse of WTC 7 twenty-three minutes before it actually fell indicates that the UK was aware of the attacks on 9/11 before they actually happened. The direct implication is that they were working with the ‘terrorists,’ all arguments as to who the terrorists actually were aside.” (1)
Searching this topic on GAoG, I’ve come across a post written by our Commander in Chief, Mr. Steve Beckow (thank you, Steve!). (2) The article was written more than two years ago February 24, 2013, one day before the hearing.
Well, it was found that Tony Rooke’s claims were valid and his charges and penalties were dismissed: “Mr. Rooke puts the basis of his defence under Section 15 of the Terrorism Act, effectively asking the court to find the BBC is a terrorist organisation and that if he continues to pay them he himself is committing a criminal offence.” – District Judge Stephen Nicholls
Rooke was being charged and prosecuted for not paying BBC their fees, and Rooke concluded that he would not because then he’d be contributing to acts of terrorism, given they reported the collapse of WTC Building Seven 23 minutes before it actually happened.
Rooke had an actual video clip of the still-standing building over the shoulder of the reporter who was –in that very moment– stating that the tower had fallen (photo can be viewed in first resource listed below)!
“I believe the BBC, who are directly funded by the licence fee, are furthering the purposes of terrorism and I have incontrovertible evidence to this effect. I do not use this word lightly given where I am…. The BBC reported it 20 minutes before it fell. They knew about it beforehand,” said Rooke in court.
My conclusion: If BBC knew in advance about the 9/11 plot, then for sure, America’s mainstream media knew also. Further, I’ll bet every government in cahoots with the cabal knew too.
Let’s review briefly why 9/11 was in inside job (just a few reasons from the endless evidence available to us):
– BBC photo of WTC7 standing while being reported as already fallen;
– All WTC buildings were a controlled-demolition collapse, as evidenced by A. emergency workers onsite reported hearing explosions right before buildings fell; B. timed collapse of WTC buildings equates to other time collapsed falls of previously demolitioned buildings; and C. explosions can be seen in videos of WTC main two towers immediately prior to falling; and
– Donald Rumsfeld told America they lost $2.3 trillion on September 10, 2001, while the American government was due to pay China millions worth in gold on September 12, 2001.
Are all these coincidences?
2. Historic Case to Challenge BBC’s 9/11 Coverage by Steve Beckow. Golden Age of Gaia.
Across our beautiful world, We Are All One.
Gavin