David Wilcock
Pat: David Wilcock has responded to Benjamin Fulford’s 11/28/11 article; specifically, about the lawsuit being presented by Neil Keenan. He is neither convinced nor unconvinced about its veracity. He raises many questions, suggests some possible rationales for Benjamin’s post, and holds out that the lawsuit and events referred to may, in fact, come to pass. Time will tell.
David concludes: “Fulford has accepted my interview invitation [for Tuesday, 11/29], so there is more to come. He knows these are the types of questions I’m going to be asking. More will be revealed. I do believe that ‘where there is smoke, there is fire’, and we are heading into some very interesting and very positive events.”
David Wilcock’s Comment on Benjamin Fulford’s 11-28-11 Article
David Wilcock, 11-28-2011
www.divinecosmos.com
Hello Everyone,
I’ve been through the entire legal document, line by line and page by page, as of Saturday night. I contacted Ben for an interview and it will happen Tuesday.
While this is very obviously a legal document, backed by extensive research, I was alarmed by the fact that the entire section on the World Economic Forum, beginning at number 33 in the document, is copied almost word-for-word out of Wikipedia with very few changes:
Fulford Document:
33. Upon information and belief, defendant the World Economic Forum (hereinafter, “WEF”) is a Swiss registered non-profit foundation best known for its annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, which brings together top business leaders, international political leaders, selected intellectuals and journalists to discuss the most pressing issues facing the world, including health and the environment.
The WEF was founded in 1971 by Klaus Martin Schwab, a German-born business professor at the University of Geneva. It was originally named the European Management Forum, but changed to its present name in 1987 and sought to broaden its vision further to include providing a platform for resolving international conflicts.
The WEF is headquartered in Cologny, Switzerland, near Geneva. In 2006 it opened affiliate offices in Beijing, China and New York, New York. The WEF purports to strive to be impartial, and is not tied to any political, partisan or national interests.
In 2009, it opened an office in Tokyo, Japan. It is committed to improving the State of the World and has observer status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council, and is under the supervision of the Swiss Federal Government.
* * *
Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_economic_forumThe World Economic Forum (WEF) is a Swiss non-profit foundation, based in Cologny, Geneva, best known for its annual meeting in Davos, a mountain resort in Graubünden, in the eastern Alps region of Switzerland.
The meeting brings together top business leaders, international political leaders, selected intellectuals and journalists to discuss the most pressing issues facing the world, including health and the environment….
The foundation was founded in 1971 by Klaus Schwab, a German-born business professor at the University of Geneva.[2] Originally named the European Management Forum, it changed its name to the World Economic Forum in 1987 and sought to broaden its vision further to include providing a platform for resolving international conflicts….
Headquartered in Cologny, the foundation opened, in 2006, regional offices in Beijing, China; and New York City, New York, United States. It strives to be impartial, and is not tied to any political, partisan or national interests.
The foundation is “committed to improving the State of the World”,[9] and has observer status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council, and is under the supervision of the Swiss Federal Council.
DW: I also noticed that the only thing that was added to this document that was not in the Wiki version was the sentence about an office having opened up in Tokyo, Japan. My initial fear was that this office may not even exist except as part of a vast fraud being perpetrated on Fulford.
I would say my number-one concern out of all this is that the document alleges that the Dragon Family has “thousands of trillions” of dollars in metals-backed bonds and is only giving Neil Keenan control of one trillion (the matured value of the 134.5B, most of which was issued in 1934 and has built in interest ever since.) However, if I were the Dragon Family and watching the world’s economies going down the toilet, including China’s, I doubt I’d hand over all power of attorney and trusteeship to a single representative.
The document becomes very repetitive in the last 40 pages, and again and again the reader is presented with the idea that Neil Keenan has been wronged, Neil Keenan has suffered financial damage, and Neil Keenan needs to be paid a trillion dollars to make up for this.
The document sets up the possibility of a single-point failure. Kill Neil Keenan and there is not one written provision for a backup in terms of who the equity would transfer to in that event. Hardly anyone in the “Dragon Family” is even named as a potential beneficiary. China obviously could desperately use the control of legitimate money to prop up their economy now, but we are supposed to believe the Dragon Family has given Keenan exclusive control of this money to do whatever he wants.
In addition, the OITC website is painfully amateur and obviously fraudulent. It forced me to reload my entire browser in 32-bit mode to run the videos. There are lots of obvious grammatical errors. The two “videos” are both very amateur Power Point presentations that anyone could have easily cooked up on their PC. The Illuminati-based symbol at the beginning of the first video is too obvious and therefore appears to be deliberately planted to make conspiracy theorists think they “found something.”
The document refers to the OITC as if it were a real entity, or at least constructed as part of a front for an elaborate scam. However, a quick Wikipedia search on “Office of International Treasury Control” reveals that the same people named in the lawsuit appear to have been involved in fraudulent activity, including an attempt to finance Fiji with billions of dollars that did not materialize.
All those are the principal negatives. The idea that so much content would be plagiarized from Wikipedia in a lawsuit that the future of humanity is supposedly riding on seems troubling to me. If I were paying a lawyer 400 an hour, I would at least expect that “due diligence” would require him to rewrite those sentences, or add something inspired by our knowledge of this organization on an insider level that supersedes whatever is public on Wikipedia.
If at any moment Neil Keenan begins saying that he expects to take possession of this trillion dollars and will distribute it to “shareholders” in a “prosperity program” he is offering, and in order to reserve your money you need to “buy in”, then I would consider that to be the kill-shot that proves this entire document is a highly elaborate scam.
We have seen before how people create vast stories about how the Federal Reserve owes some entity money, and based on the accrued interest it would wipe out the Fed to pay it back. Then they rope in “investors” who have a minimum buy-in of 100 dollars and are told they could increase their yield by a factor of 1000 percent or more once the “prosperity funds” are “Financed.”
Back in 1998 and thereafter I had the first of a series of contacts from people, sometimes in large numbers, telling me it was “urgent” that I get in by Friday, let’s say, or the “window” was going to close.
Then we found out that one of the perpetrators of a scam like this went to Federal court. He defended himself and actually laughed about what he had done. He told the judge that if people were dumb enough to believe him and send him money, they deserved to lose it and just bought themselves a valuable lesson. The judge did not agree. His followers then blamed the “Dark Illuminati” for this man ending up in prison. This all happened about a decade ago now.
So I don’t like the fact that this document provides no structure as to how Neil Keenan would distribute the equity in the event it is transferred to him. The statement they gave Fulford on his typepad blog blames the world’s problems on “Jewish bankers,” which is not what Fulford agrees with and this poses another problem, as it is clearly untrue. It clouds the legitimacy of this legal instrument for one of its principals to be publicly saying that it is a suit against “Jewish bankers.”
All that being said, I have direct insider knowledge of how the Bretton Woods / international banking system really works. There is a LOT of info in this document that is accurate about how the system runs and is NOT public. In fact, I was told never to type in certain keywords online as it will get the SEC tracking you as someone who “knows”. I do believe this is true.
There is no question that the BRICS alliance [Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa] is rising up against the Old World Order. There is no question that they are planning on launching their own financial system. There is no question that a large number of underground bases have been completely cleared of materiel and personnel as of the end of September.
I have direct insider confirmation that the Monaco Colloquium did take place. Many things Fulford has said corroborate very nicely with what my own insiders have shared with me and I did not make public. This has happened so many times as to be dazzling. The China’s October Surprise story I’ve been documenting on my website divinecosmos.com is heavily backed by provable evidence of stunning equipment failures and bizarre events, like mass bird and fish deaths around the world apparently due to HAARP being used as a defense.
Let’s also not forget that my insiders told me the 50 ICBMs that were powered down in Wyoming in October 2010 were hit by a UFO, and then Robert Hastings revealed that following July that a cigar-shaped metallic ship was seen hovering over the base for hours as this took place.
So, my point is that something real is going on here. I do not want to definitively conclude that this new legal document is fraudulent. It is too early to tell and copying from Wikipedia is not a damning indictment. However, others with more legal acumen than me may decide to pursue this and see how well it holds up under further examination.
I told Ben it is possible that he has been the target of a DDT (Decoy, Distract and Trash) campaign. Simply put, we have extensive evidence BRICS is turning against the Old World Order. Fulford himself has bonafide contacts with insiders that give him information that extensively corroborates what I’ve heard from insiders as well… a pool of people that I gained access to, in part, due to my connections with Project Camelot. Their connection to insiders is easily provable with all the videos they have released, featuring live interviews with them.
If this is a DDT campaign, the idea would be to possibly even take it so far as to start soliciting “investments” in a “prosperity program” so that some people get excited and expect to be rich, whereas everyone else thinks it’s a total ripoff. Then it would appear that’s all there is to the story.
However, I must say that this is a hyper-complex legal document. It does not have grammatical errors (I found one) and is highly intricate. It also names many people by their full name and gives detailed allegations. The effort it would take to fake something of this complexity would be vast. If it were a scam to make money, why put Wikipedia quotes in the document that people would find almost immediately? If someone went to this much trouble just to try to rip off unsuspecting Internet “investors,” then I would expect them to do more.
Movies like Thrive are putting the truth in black and white. I consider the release of that film to be a seminal event in world history, even though I would have done it differently in certain ways. There is an entire hour, from about 38 minutes to 1:37, in which an airtight, damning indictment of New World Order / Illuminati material is given. I think the people who attack and hate on this movie are probably doing so because they are severely traumatized by being hit with so much information about the real nature of the world in that one-hour burst of time.
In this case, we know the document had to be written by a lawyer or someone intimately familiar with legal structure. I’ve been through many contracts in my work and this document is very intricate. It’s an awful lot of work to do just to hopefully rip off a few thousand people at best, although if some “investors” gave 10K or more, you could potentially become a millionaire from something like this. It has been done before and is still being done now. The people who get roped into these things believe it with religious fervor and you cannot tell them otherwise.
Again, though, this document has powerful insider knowledge that is not public. It aligns very nicely with a variety of things I’ve heard about and have not published. It clearly aligns with data that Fulford has independently obtained from witnesses firsthand.
If this lawsuit were to be taken seriously on the world stage, the ensuing discussion could pry open many doors. We do need to follow up regarding the legal firm that is cited in the document… are they a real firm, do they have a history, do they affirm the validity of the document. We need to verify that this was actually filed as a civil suit and get the dedicated link that proves it, from an official site. So far pacer.gov does not have it on record.
Again, I am not drawing definitive conclusions at this point, but I cannot publicly support this as a valid document. Fulford admitted that the “OITC” is fraudulent and that raises many questions, as it is referred to extensively in the document.
There is still excitement and sizzle in this story for me because the document may have been deliberately created to LOOK LIKE it was nothing more than a scam. Think about it. If insiders created something like this, what could it do?
Every insider I know says that the big game is always that “the truth is sandwiched between two lies.” There is Pavlovian-type research that shows that if you give a dog two opposing pieces of information strongly enough, so the dog has no idea which one is correct, it actually will go into seizures and ultimately die of a heart attack.
This is THE most classic mind-control / disinformation tactic there is. You can see it every time UFOs are written about or presented in mainstream media. They give you interesting info that is likely true, but then end it with skeptical dismissive statements that make it seem likely false.
They ALWAYS have to work this way. Any time there is something out there that is true, that they don’t want you to know, they have to fight that truth by putting out something that discredits it. The best way to do this is to embed the information you don’t want people to know directly into the mechanism you then use to destroy it.
In this case, if the document Fulford posted is a total fraud, then its purpose would be to rope people in for a period of time, get them all excited, and then at a certain point someone pops the balloon and everyone who believed it is humiliated. The average person now says “Fulford is totally full of $#!+ and this whole thing was a lie. Everything was a lie. No one is going to save us. The Illuminati are still in control. WHY GOD, WHYYYYY?!!?”
That’s the game. They want you to be disgusted, horrified and hopeless. Fulford is a marvelous antidote to the fear porn that dominates the alternative conspiracy media and I support him and his work. That’s why I took the time and studied this as if it were a contract I myself was reviewing for a potential signature as a binding agreement.
Fulford has accepted my interview invitation, so there is more to come. He knows these are the types of questions I’m going to be asking. More will be revealed. I do believe that “where there is smoke, there is fire,” and we are heading into some very interesting and very positive events. This document may be a highly sophisticated way to cloud the truth with disinformation and attempt to completely destroy Fulford, his career and his credibility.
So again… I personally do not support this document as legitimate unless compelling new information addresses the inconsistencies. However, I have no trouble believing it is an insider creation that neatly matches the truth and could be intended to distract and derail an international effort to bring these perpetrators to justice.
And justice will be served. You cannot run a “secret evil government” when everyone knows about it. Thrive [the movie] [or here or here] is the proof that it is now only a matter of time before it all unravels, and as soon as BRICS’ squeeze play on the Western economies makes them collapse (my insiders are saying they are trying to hold this off until Spring) then we will see all sorts of things happen quickly.
I highly encourage you to maintain a positive attitude and not give into fear. One of the cornerstones of my work is that our thoughts are not private — they influence the world around us. That has now been proven in my book The Source Field Investigations beyond any reasonable doubt, with extensive, verifiable scientific evidence.
From this body of data, we can demonstrate that there is a severely disproportionate positive effect upon our world when people think positively as opposed to negatively. That’s why seven thousand people were able to reduce worldwide terrorism by seven percent, simply by meditating as a group.
THIS is actually the real secret. The occult groups have to keep us feeling tired, weary, hopeless and miserable, because otherwise we create changes in the world that dismantle their power structures. It’s all part of a shared, subconscious connection we have to each other that influences our thoughts, decisions and behaviors.
So please don’t let my criticisms of this document make you feel hopeless. If this was “built to fail” I highly doubt they expected it to unravel this quickly. I do not see it as a negative. Someone went to a great deal of trouble to put this together. If it is totally legit, that is a fantastic thing for the planet. I have no difficulty with supporting it if it turns out to be true.
What I do want to stress, again, is that this is all ultimately a battle for hearts and minds. Your heart. Your mind. How do you feel? Are you confident and optimistic about the future? Or, do you feel despondent, wiped out, paranoid and fearful? That is the choice that is before you each and every moment of each and every day. What thoughts will you take? Do you support love or fear?
Choose.
– David