Well, the theory that Obama was participating in a plan to force disclosure through a sting has been corroborated by Matthew Ward in his latest message:
“The members also agreed that something dramatic was required to get the peoples’ attention; however, because it is your world, it was up to your leaders to decide what that would be. Announcing that members of other civilizations are among you required resolving myriad details before it could be properly presented, and the suggestion that all truths be told straightforwardly was vetoed because there was no agreement as to which should be revealed first—in essence, which finger should be pulled out of the dike. Some felt that would best be achieved by announcing the death of Osama bin Laden, the officially accused mastermind of “9/11.” They felt that announcement could be veered into exposing the truth about the horrific events of that day almost ten years ago, and it would eliminate fear in the people who believe what they so often have been told: No one is safe as long as bin Laden is alive.
“Only when that suggestion was raised did some in the group, including US President Obama, know for certain that the man had been dead for almost a decade, and those few vehemently denounced the suggestion. But since no one had any other idea that would get the attention of the world, the majority voted to ‘kill bin Laden’ and later publicly explain why that story was released.
“It can be argued that deception to achieve a positive goal is ‘better’ than deception to embark upon a negative goal. It is not our desire or our purpose to judge the decision, much less judge those who made it, but only to relate the information given us by Earth’s monitors in Nirvana. They do not know how the explanation for the decision will come because the responsible parties are still discussing strategies for the next steps.
“Regardless of how this plays out, by the end of next year, the light will have vanquished all darkness on Earth—this has been assured from the beginning of her ascension. You can best serve in your capacity as lightworkers by neither condoning nor condemning the bin Laden story, but rather by adding your light to its intention—to speed disclosure of all truths so reforms also can come swiftly. And for those leaders who know the greater urgency, the intention is for all persons to have the opportunity to embrace the light within truth before it is too late for them to physically go along with Earth if they chose that journey in their soul contracts.” (Matthew’s Message, May 8, 2011.)
I now have the confidence I lacked in developing that theory and don’t feel any longer that, if I would push ahead with it, that I would be leading you astray.
However, I’ve also learned from the experience that I haven’t the time resources to track each twist and turn of the plot in the way I started out to do. In a sense it’s good that I uncoupled myself because it would have exhausted me to follow it day by day and still get my normal posting done.
But we do know now what President Obama is up to. Please be aware that anyone who doesn’t read Matthew Ward – Alex Jones, Paul Joseph Watson, Alfred Webre, and perhaps even David Wilcock – will not have this information and some of them would not believe it if they did. But I do. If anyone has access to David, they may wish to bring it to his attention. He alone of all of them is likely to pay attention to it.
I’m happy to have learned this from Matthew and thank him a thousand times, not only for addressing it, but addressing it adequately enough that there’s no ambiguity arising from his discussion and no leftover strands.
Suzan has raised a good point that pursuing this operation too vigorously could tip off the cabal. That’s true. Reflecting on that, it may be better not to follow it and give intelligence to the dark side. Maybe it’s enough for us to know what may be happening here.