Billy Meier's photo of of Asket the Timmarian, his mentor - and family
Well, it feels like it’s time to begin talking about family. For the most part, that means talking about the mammalian strains of galactic humans – in other words, us.
Having resolved to do so, I decided to start with the Andromedans. No particular reason. But when I did, I immediately ran into a problem. The very first video I looked at lumped Andromedans in with what it called “Nordics.” In starting with “Nordics,” does that mean I’m biased towards the white races? I hadn’t thought I was. It’s just where I started.
Then a second difficulty arose and it’s best to get these difficulties out of the way before starting out. George Kavassilas back in 2004 was warning us that Nordics were shape-shifting reptiles who planned to enslave us by tempting us into their ships and taking us to Mars. Do I believe that? Most emphatically not.
I’ve looked at George’s teachings in an article on this site (1) and I find George to be not credible for a number of reasons. But let me summarize those reasons here before beginning so that the chief opponent of developing friendship with the galactics is out of the way. We’re all going to be responsible for devising some way of establishing credibility and thereby knowing what we should believe and what not so let me share how I’ve established whether or not I wish to follow George’s thinking.
(A second major critic is Marshall Vians Summers and I’ve also looked at his criticisms of the galactics. So that is also available for you to read.) (2)
Drawing allegedly of SaLuSa (Mike Quinsey cannot say for sure if SaLuSa looks this way), a Syrian - and family
By the way, George also doesn’t believe George. Recently he said that he was under mind control earlier. I can believe that.
Here is what instantly struck me when viewing his videos. Although George said he was enlightened and had travelled to the 13th Dimension, he failed to understand the nature of the Holy Father and Divine Mother. He portrayed the Cosmic Male as the creator of the Andromedan galaxy and he did so because “andros” means male, and the Cosmic Female as the creator of the Milky Way galaxy because Milky Way refers to mother’s milk.
First of all, the Cosmic Male does not create. As readers of my articles know, the level of reality referred to as “male” is not a male and is distinguished from the “female” as being stillness as opposed to motion and silence as opposed to sound. The “male” is the formless transcendental God and the “female” is the form-filled phenomenal God.
Only the cosmic female creates while the cosmic male remains inactive, which is why Shakti is depicted dancing on the supine form of Shiva. There are many articles under “Spiritual Essays” that discuss this mystical distinction. No need to remain in the dark, so to speak.
Second of all, why the divine should single out two galaxies among many for the special attention George devotes to them escapes me. God is impartial. Why would he would give undue attention to Andromeda and the Milky Way?
Moreover, George focuses on the Greek language to explain things about the action of the creators, but I doubt that the creators are moved by distinctions from the Greek language. He does this again when he explains the name of a planet as “Despora,” based on the Greek word “diaspora” and having the same meaning. Same objection. God and the galactics were probably not motivated by distinctions based on the Greek language, even if George is.
Cdr. Hatonn, Director of Interdimensional Communication for the Galactic Federation, in his rather gay hat - and family
George goes on to offer spurious explanations of Osiris and Horis, which were probably names for the two levels of reality I’ve characterized as the Father and Son in Christianity or Brahman and Atman in Hinduism. They are the Transcendental and the Transcendental in the Phenomenal and George should know that if he is enlightened, as he says he is.
Finally George characterized the P52 (present day plus 52,000 years into the future) Orion Nordics as shapeshifting reptiles who have assumed human shape. Pardon me, but reptilian humans are reptilian-derived and mammalian humans (like us) are mammalian-derived.
Reptilians are quite happy being reptilians, evidently, (3) and have no desire to shed their shape and become humans. To say otherwise is to be hopelessly anthropocentric (human-centred). P52s are one stream of our ancestry.
Our ancestry, while it has certain DNA extracts from the reptilians, is mammalian based, by and large. So the P52s could not be reptilian – or else we would be also since they are us and we will be them.
For these and other reasons, George’s early teachings are not credible as far as I’m concerned. The purpose of his teachings back then was to warn us not to board an alien spacecraft before Ascension because the first wave of aliens are here to lure us to enslavement on Mars.
Well, the light energies on the planet have risen, according to our sources, to the extent that we needn’t be bothered about dark aliens. (4) The Galactic Federation is in charge of Mars and has no interest in enslaving us. And, if you’re worried about boarding an alien spacecraft before Ascension, then don’t. No one can force you.
I say this in starting out to dispense with the chief critic of the Galactic Federation. You’ll see others drawing on George’s line of reasoning. If you’re attracted to George’s viewpoint, you won’t be attracted to mine and you may as well turn elsewhere for comfort.
I do intend to board an alien spacecraft, the earlier the better. I’m happy to be the first if you like. I have a rendezvous with my twin waiting for me. I intend to have tea with SaLuSa and Matthew just as soon as I can arrange it. I have no intentions of ending up enslaved on Mars.
Homo Arcturus
So it’s a given if you come with me in the next few days on an exploration of the galactic races here to assist us with Ascension that you’re not worried about them. If you are, perhaps read the essays in the section called NEGATIVE ALIEN RACES to reassure yourself. There you’ll hear Matthew and SaLuSa tell us that no dark races can approach the Earth any more. And you’ll learn about who the races were who had dark designs on the planet.
This shift in emphasis seems to me to have been planned. I began feeling it several days ago. I’ve become uninterested in terrestrial politics. I had a dream of my twin and immediately ordered a reading. The reading tells me I’m an Arcturian (I hope you don’t mind an Arcturian living next to you) and my interest in off-planet species ramps up. Seems like the usual way things are done around here in this new era, does it not?
Footnotes
(1) See Comments on Kavassilas.
(2) Read all three articles together if you want a complete critique of Summers: Examples of Disinformation Sites – Part 3 – “Allies of Humanity”; More on the “Allies of Humanity” – 1/2; More on the “Allies of Humanity” – 2/2.
(3) Read the delightful commentary of Horiss on his benevolent reptilian civilization: A Benevolent Reptilian Civilization .
(4) The rising of the light energies and quarantining of the dark alien races is discussed here: State of the Planet, Fate of The Dark; Need We Fear Dark Extraterrestrials? – Part 1/3; Need We Fear Dark Extraterrestrials? – Part 2/3; Need We Fear Dark Extraterrestrials? – Part 3/3.