Alfred reviews components of the current “disclosure wave.”
2010 extraterrestrial disclosure wave surges around UN, nuclear shutdowns, Denver ET/UFO vote
Alfred Lambremont Webre, Seattle Exopolitics Examiner, Sept. 27, 2010
For the first time since the early days of the presidency of Barack Obama in 2009, a wave of scheduled or predicted events around the theme of ‘official’ disclosure of extraterrestrial life to the human civilization of Earth appears to be surging.
The early days of the Obama administration were rife with rumors that ET ‘disclosure is imminent’ and 
one observer predicted, “An official announcement by the Obama administration disclosing the reality of extraterrestrial life is imminent.”
In fact, Barack Obama’s failure to make ET disclosure turned out to be the top UFO/ET story of 2009.
As of today, almost a year to the day since the 2009 Obama ‘ET disclosure wave’ started, a new 2010 ‘ET disclosure wave has begun to surge.
The 2010 ET disclosure wave is focused around a new set of institutions from the Obama administration – an announcement of an appointment of a person – and then an official denial of this UN appointment – for ‘contact by extraterrestrial civilizations’ at the United Nations, a National Press Club Press conference by U.S. and U.K. nuclear missile UFO whistleblowers, and the Denver ET Affairs November 2010 vote.
Examiner.com readers can view a video of the last 71 minutes of the Sept 27, 2010 National Press Club press conference (carried live by CNN) by clicking here:
An in-depth evaluation of each of these ‘drivers’ in the 2010 ET disclosure wave reveals deep conflicts around what ‘extraterrestrial contact’ may mean to the SETI ‘search for the extraterrestrial presence’ paradigm as used by the United Nations personnel and bodies, and the UFO and Exopolitics paradigm of ‘extraterrestrial disclosure’ used by citizen-driven initiatives such as the nuclear missile UFO whistleblowers and the proponents of the Denver Extraterrestrials Affairs commission.
The confusion and false expectations of the 2009 ET disclosure wave must be avoided at all costs in the new 2010 ET disclosure wave now surging.
Dr Mazlan Othman & the UN: Just what does ‘extraterrestrial contact’ mean?
In some deep sense, there is still a deep chasm of mis-understanding and cultural conflict between the SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) paradigm that for many years has dominated the discussion at the Royal society and the U.N. Outer space office (UNOOSA), and reality of the UFO and extraterrestrial presence that U.S. nuclear missile UFO whistleblowers, proponents of the Denver ET Affairs commission, and the UFO and exopolitical research community are referring to.
It was initially reported that Dr Mazlan Othman, head of the UN Outer Space Office (UNOOSA) and former director of the Malaysian Space Agency, announced she would explain at a October 4-5, 2010 at a U.K. Royal Society conference on a scientific and social agenda on extraterrestrial life how a proposal to designate her office as the official point of contact with extraterrestrial life will be debated in the U.N. Outer Space Committee, and if approved, sent to the U.N. General Assembly for a vote.
Then in a public email, Dr. Othman stated, “It sounds really cool but I have to deny it,” she said of the [London Times] story. She will be attending a conference next week, but she’ll be talking about how the world deals with “near-Earth objects”.
Other news reports stated, “A UN spokesperson this afternoon told Newslite the story was “nonsense” and insisted there were no current plans to appointment anyone to the role.
“Never-mind… we guess this just means any visiting aliens will have to continue asking to be taken to our leader.
“The spokesperson said: “The Office for Outer Space Affairs, headed by Mazlan Othman, serves as the secretariat to the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space.
“It carries out activities to promote international cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space and strengthens the use of space science and technology applications.
“The mandate of the Office for Outer Space Affairs is defined by the United Nations General Assembly and there are no plans to change the current mandate.
“The article in the Sunday Times is nonsense.”
Prior to this announcement-denial of the UN ‘extraterrestrial point of contact,’ Dr. Othman is reported to have said.“The continued search for extraterrestrial communication, by several entities, sustains the hope that some day human kind will received signals from extraterrestrials.’
“When we do, we should have in place a coordinated response that takes into account all the sensitivities related to the subject.
“The UN is a ready-made mechanism for such coordination.”
The U.N. General Assembly in 1978 in Decision 33/426 (1978) approved the establishment of an office to investigate ‘extraterrestrial life’. That 1978 Decision has not been implemented to date.
A review of the Committee debates and working papers of the U.N. Outer Space Committee make it clear that by ‘extraterrestrial contact’ is meant contact of the sort envisioned by SETI through the reception of radio signals from a distant point in deep space.
In a fundamental way, this chasm between the SETI-type contact and an actual physical contact from extraterrestrial presence around Earth may serve to fuel false expectations and substantive confusion about what ‘ET contact’ means. There is a vast difference between (1) the sort of SETI-type radio antenna contact that Dr Mazlan Othman and the rest of UNOOSA and the UN General Assembly have in mind and (2) authentic disclosure of secret human-extraterrestrial liaison programs of the U.S. government and the presence around Earth of multiple advanced intelligent civilizations from other worlds and dimensions.
When Dr Mazlan Othman (director of the Malaysian Space Agency 2002-7) and the UN speak of ‘extraterrestrial contact,’ they are speaking of a scenario of the return of radio signals from some distant galaxy via the SETI program. They are not speaking of, and will officially fail to confirm, the evidence of an active extraterrestrial presence on Earth, and of secret human-ET liaison programs of the U.S. government.
The functional effect (and some say the mission) of the SETI program – and of the UN ‘ET’ paradigm – is to continue the cover-up of the active extraterrestrial presence on Earth, and of secret human-extraterrestrial liaison programs of he U.S. government.
This fueling of false expectations by the UN designation happened already in 2009 with the Obama ‘disclosure is imminent’ bubble and should not be encouraged again in 2010, as has happened already by this apparent reporting of a bogus announcement by the UN on its appointment of an ‘extraterrestrial contact’ person in Dr. Othman.
Deactivation of nuclear weapons ‘is a message’ to human race
Examiner.com readers can view a video of the last 71 minutes of the Sept 27, 2010 National Press Club press conference (carried live by CNN) by clicking here:
The 2010 ET disclosure wave has no such ambiguities in the case of a Sept 27, 2010 press conference held in Washington DC by U.S. nuclear missile UFO whistleblowers.
The message of the intelligent ‘extraterrestrial or interdimensional’ civilizations intervening to shut down specific nuclear missile facilities is:
“Deactivation of nuclear weapons ‘is a message’ to human race”
The whistleblowers, all former U.S. servicemen representing more than 100 U.S. servicemen who have come forward on the issue of have a clear agenda of putting onto the public record the active intervention of extraterrestrial or interdimensional intelligent civilizations in matters relating to human nuclear weaponry.
At the Sept 27, 2010 National Press Club press conference, former U.S. servicemen Dwynne Arneson, Bruce Fenstermacher, Charles Halt, USAF Col. Robert Hastings, Robert Jamison, Patrick McDonough, Charles Halt, Jerome Nelson, and former Capt. Robert Salas, disclosed facts related to interventions by UFOs in U.S. and U.K. nuclear missile facilities.
According to news reports, “Capt Robert Salas, a former missile launch officer, said he was on duty during one incident at Malmstrom air force base in Montana in 1967.
“An object came over and hovered directly over the site,” he said. “The missiles shut down. And the same thing happened at another site a week later. There’s a strong interest in our missiles by these objects, wherever they come from. I personally think they’re not from planet Earth.’”
News reports from the press conference also state, “Suddenly one of the objects sent a concentrated beam at the feet of the terrified men.
“’Was this a warning? An attempt to communicate? A weapon? Then just as suddenly as it appeared, it disappeared,’ he said.
“The entire incident was categorised as a British affair because it had happened off base, Mr. Halt said.
“’I have no idea what we saw that night but I do know it was under intelligent control. My theory is that it was from another dimension or extra-terrestrial,’ he said.
“The six former U.S. Air Force officers and one former enlisted man, all presented declassified information which they claim backs up their findings.
“They want US and British authorities to release 60 years worth of ‘X-Files’ they claim proves the existence of extra-terrestrials.
“And the men said that the UFOs deactivation of nuclear weapons was a message to the human race to move away from arms race.”
At the press conference, Col. Hastings, answering a journalist, stated: “I don’t think there is a potential hostility [from the intelligent civilization behind the UFOs], except for the narrow mind people.”
During the press conference, Col. Hastings also made a very revealing statement with regard to the impact of the ET disclosure he and his colleagues were making at this event.
Col. Hastings stated, “The only change will be a paradigm shift.” In other words, Col. Hastings is stating that his hopes that the disclosure his fellow whistleblowers are making will result in a paradigm shift by the human race away from nuclear weapons and toward cooperation with other intelligent civilizations in the multi-verse.
La Raza, Republicans and the Denver ET Affairs Commission ballot vote
The Denver ET commission ballot initiative, scheduled for Election Tuesday November 2, 2010, has recently gained the electoral support of a Key Latino leader whose organization is responsible for the annual Cinco de Mayo 300,000 person celebration. Veronica Barela, CEO and Executive Director of NEWSED in endorsing Initiative 300, stated, “I support Initiative 300 to create an Extraterrestrial Affairs Commission and I encourage people to vote yes.”
The Denver Extraterrestrial Affairs Commission appears to be the only current initiated ordinance proposal on the Nov. 2, 2010 ballot, as opposed to no charter amendments and only one recall petition “Petition to Recall Andrea Merida from the Office of Denver Public School Board District 2”
Therefore Initiative 300 will stand out on the ballot and not be lost among a forest of other ballot initiatives, charter amendments and recall petitions at the City of Denver level.
There are no concrete present indicators as to whether Initiative 300 will actually pass on Nov. 2, 2010.
The following exchange between Jeff Peckman, principal proponent of the Denver ET ballot initiative, and a Republican opponent is illustrative of the polarization accompanying many ballot issues:
Bryan @ 2010-09-03 12:42:15 “While Peckman believes that there is support for the initiative, the City of Denver might not. Recently Denver District 2 conducted a poll asking if residents supported a Commission for Extraterrestrial Affairs and the results were 8% supporting and 92% opposed.”
Jeff Peckman @ 2010-09-03 13:27:19 “The Denver City Council member for District 2 is a Republican. And Republicans represent LESS than 8% of the Denver City Council. And the District 2 poll was done BEFORE the voter education campaign started. Read very revealing facts about Democrat and Republican leaders’ views and experiences with UFOs and ETs in the 8-page paper at extracampaign.org. Then decide your vote.”
How to evaluate the 2010 ET disclosure wave so far
1. Timing – The 2010 ET disclosure wave is starting to surge in the Fall 2010 (late September, early October period), the same period as the surge of the 2009 ET disclosure wave, centered around a purported disclosure by President Barack Obama that has net yet materialized. One can question whether this Fall surge is an ‘after Labor Day’ phenomenon, or whether there are deeper dimensions driving this wave.
2. Citizen disclosure – Of the three measures so far in the 2010 ET disclosure wave, two involve substantial citizen-driven extraterrestrial disclosure – the nuclear missile UFO whistleblowers, and the Denver ET Affairs commission vote. Citizen-driven disclosure appears to be a key criterion determining whether a specific ET disclosure effort is directed at authentic disclosure of an actual extraterrestrial or interdimensional presence around Earth and of existing human-extraterrestrial liaison programs of the U.S. government.
3. The SETI model and the ET Truth embargo – The SETI model was developed and founded by the late astronomer Carl Sagan (himelf covertly knowedgeable about the UFO/ET presence around Earth) and is plausibly a sophisticated alternative ‘cover’ to authentic extraterrestrial and UFO disclosure. The SETI paradigm and many of the scientists and infrastructure devoted to SETI are hostile to the UFO/ET and Exopolitics research paradigm that states extraterrestrial and interdimensional civilizations are visiting Earth at this time and have been engaging some governments such as the U.S. for at least 50 years.
Scientists and spokespersons for the SETI model such as Seth Shostak predominate at the Oct. 4-5, 2010 Royal Society meeting at which Dr Mazlan Othman, director of the UN Outer Space Office as contact person for extraterrestrial civilizations is scheduled to speak, apparently on Near Earth Objects (NEOs) and not on SETI-type extraterrestrial contacts. Seth Shostak, who was featured by 20th Century Fox in a mini-documentary on ‘extraterrestrial contact’ along with this reporter Alfred Lambremont Webre, is diametrically opposed to disclosure of the extraterrestrial presence around Earth through the Exopolitics paradigm, and believes that ‘extraterrestrial disclosure’ will come only through the SETI paradigm.
4. Authentic ET disclosure vs. the SETI paradigm – Even if the news report itself were authentic (which as of this writing the UN itself has denied), the United Nation’s very use of a SETI-type ‘extraterrestrial contact’ paradigm arouses false expectations of authentic extraterrestrial disclosure being undertaken by the United Nations. Similar false expectations of authentic ET disclosure unfortunately occurred in exopolitical reporting around the 2009 ET disclosure wave, by over-interpretation of purported actions within the Obama administration.
It is important not to repeat the promotion of false expectations during the 2010 ET disclosure wave by attributing to the SETI model adopted by the United Nations the same validity as citizen-driven groups that are attempting to achieve authentic disclosure of an extraterrestrial presence now on Earth.
The United Nation’s use of a SETI paradigm that itself understands ‘extraterrestrial contact’ to be contact via radio signals from deep space can be seen as a functional continuation of the ET truth embargo.