Lawrence brings to my attention a bombshell video on 9/11.
Richard D. Hall is a qualified electrical and electronics engineer, who worked for UK companies on the Trident nuclear program and other largescale projects for sixteen years.
Doubleclick on the video to go to Youtube and watch the second part.
After watching Simon Shack’s September Clues, he set about trying to discover what it was that struck the World Trade Center Towers on 9/11.
The first thing he noticed was that only one video existed in which the object that actually hit Tower 2 was plainly visible and what that video revealed was not an airplane at all but what Hall describes as a “round ball.”
He modelled everything he could find out about that round ball and its trajectory. He examined all the videos and photographs.
His conclusions are that (1) the videos and photographs supplied to the television networks after the event were all staged or doctored; (2) the few witnesses who actually described seeing airplanes were hired to say what they said; (3) a circular, anti-gravity vehicle, seen in only one of the undoctored videos, packed with high explosives, is what actually hit the building.
Hall believes that the 9/11 conspirators used a secret anti-gravity craft such as has been developed at Area 51 to slam into the building and then doctored the videos after, introducing airplanes, and sending these faked videos to the media.
He believes that the few photographs and videos that exist are all supplied by the conspirators to support the conclusion that airplanes were used.
He looks at problems with the videos supplied to the networks, such as the plane disappearing when it reached critical visual boundaries in the faked footage. the plane exiting the building, which it actually did not do, and expected background being absent in doctored versions.
His explanation accounts for the so-called pod on the bottom of the aircraft, which he believes is the result of the video program rationalizing what it sees (I’m not explaining this very well; he does a better job). Where the plane’s outline is not present, the video program chose to retain the round ball’s outline. The “pod” therefore is the residuum of the round ball’s outline. He demonstrates that the size and shape of the round ball in the undoctored video is the same size and shape as the “pod.”
It’s one thing to publish findings like these after you’re retired; it’s another thing to publish them in mid-career, as Hall has. I think it takes a great deal more courage to do the latter than the former and Hall is to be congratulated. Most whistleblowers have suffered for their revelations. Very few that I know of have in any way gained from them.
I’m hoping to have enough time to do a special edition on 9/11 this Sept. 11th. I’ve worried that people are letting 9/11 go, as the years pass, but Hall’s research shows that they definitely are not.