The widening of the stage and the impact of the heart opening create “new business” for a person going through Ascension publicly.
Significant aspects of my behavior will have to change, not like I see the whole picture or how to do it.
Once one tastes transformative love, I cannot see how most people wouldn’t want more. And more. And more.
And a time arrives when the ordinary measures are not causing more to arise. At that point, I’d imagine most people take stock and see what the barriers may be. I know I have.
Sanat Kumara, in our last Hour with an Angel said that this breaking down of the barriers to love is central to the Company of Heaven’s work with us on our Ascension.
“Really the question has been the breaking down with love of the various levels of resistance that humans have had to accepting the love and accepting the fact that they are love.” (1)
In my case, the barriers aren’t the ways I learned in the family as much as the ways I learned in worskhops and courses. In that bygone era, different problems were being addressed and different measures seemed appropriate, measures that no longer work today.
Back then, we were determined to break the deadening hand of conformity, stereotypical roles for men and women, arbitrary taboos, and so on. People were admired for standing up for themselves and opposition was the order of the day.
Nowadays we’re wanting to achieve a higher-dimensional way of being. It isn’t opposition any more but cooperation that’s the order of the day.
In the growth movement, the emphasis was on authenticity and transparency. I used to respond to things pretty much as I felt and that was what was wanted and needed.
It was a sound strategy for the times. But it bears no relationship to what the Company of Heaven asks of us today, which is that our communications and behavior be “of love.” (2)
That left a gulf between me and those who follow the teachings of the Company of Heaven more closely than I. I was authentic and transparent and they were loving and compassionate. We existed in two solitudes.
In bygone days, I didn’t experience love – not transformative love – except perhaps for a few minutes a year, in a peak experience. Romantic love, yes, but that also became a victim, on occasion, to my “transparency.” I had no idea what “of love” meant.
Now that I’ve experienced love – not like I’m experiencing it at this moment – but now that I’ve tasted it and hung out with it long enough, I too want my communications to be of love. If they’re not, chances are they’ll chase love away. My priorities have changed: I don’t want love to be chased away any more.
I was daydreaming today, imagining how I’d respond communicationally to a certain situation, and I found myself playing out “resist, resent, revenge.” I wasn’t using the distinction that it be “of love.” Seeing that shocked me and woke me up. Can I afford any longer to be unconscious in this area?
It’s time for me to relearn how to be with people. I’ve been a hermit most of my life – a developed writer, perhaps, but not necessarily a developed person.
Now I have to drop back and relearn basic relationship and communication skills. What does it mean that a communication be “of love”? What else do I need to do to ensure that all my behavior is of love?
The prospect is daunting. How does one relearn something as extensive as that? I have no time to study and attend workshops. How do I make such a wholesale transition?
I suspect that what gives me pause is not the “how,” but the time, the diligence, and the resolve it’ll take. It’s those things that seem overwhelming.
But, inescapably, that’s what this job is all about. We all have tremendous help at this time and I’m sure there are people with a more daunting prospect that they’re facing. It does cause me to feel compassion for those people who’ve played the role of Black Hats. The leap they’ll have to make, when the curtain comes down, must be almost beyond conception.
(1) “Transcript: Sanat Kumara: The Only Litmus Test is Love,” at
(2) Some examples are:
“Many of the structures you have — and we’re not suggesting that they have been not worthwhile; there are many worthwhile, many, many, many worthwhile things that the humans have constructed. But many more have been constructed on these false human paradigms that were not real. And they most certainly were not of this side. And they were not of love. They were of belief in the need to control, or to be greedy, or to be lustful — to limit.” (“Archangel Michael on NESARA, Opposing the Cabal, and Ascension – Oct. 1, 2011 – Part 2/3,” at http://the2012scenario.com/2011/10/archangel-michael-on-nesara-opposing-the-cabal-and-ascension-part-23/.)
“When you encounter that which is not of love, then what you do is you send — not engage, not jump into that person’s field — but you send from your heart to theirs, knowing that they are already on your grid, the collective grid, you send them the amplification of love, and it will, and it does, transform them.” (“Archangel Gabrielle on the New Golden Grid, the Process of Ascension, and the Advent of Global Prosperity – Part 2/2,” channeled by Linda Dillon, August 26, 2013, at http://goldenageofgaia.com/2013/08/archangel-gabrielle-on-the-new-golden-grid-the-process-of-ascension-and-the-advent-of-global-prosperity-part-22/.)
“In your natural state as beings of Love, there is no thought of hostilities, threats, or betrayals because they are not of Love; and only Love is Real.” (Saul, October 1, 2014.)
“We transmute and transubstantiate that which is not of love and wholeness into the truth of love and wholeness.” (“Transcript: Archangel Raphael Discusses Healing in the Higher Realms on Heavenly Blessings,” channeled by Linda Dillon, January 21, 2014, at http://goldenageofgaia.com/2014/02/transcript-archangel-raphael-discusses-healing-in-the-higher-realms-on-heavenly-blessings-january-21-2014/.)