I personally don’t believe a word of what is said in the article in question and don’t believe it makes good sense to feed that fire, which is obviously argumentative, or grace it with a response.
In the most general of terms, I have no problem with another exercising their choice to leave aside one source of information and choose another.
At the same time, the article in question is vituperative. It’s polemical. It’s demeaning. I don’t feel the need to react to it and I would hope you don’t as well.
To be non-reactive in the face of such an attack is surely one of the values that we’ve learned from our sources, is it not?
I have no doubts myself about the value of channeled information. I love the body of channeled literature that has been produced in the last five years probably more than any other, with the exception of our own extensive and ancient body of literature from this planet’s enlightened masters. (1)
How else would we talk with Archangel Michael or Gabrielle if not through telepaths and other channelers? But if others don’t want to read it, that’s quite fine with me.
Each of us has to choose where we stand on a matter such as this. I personally have full and unqualified trust in the Company of Heaven.
We’ll go through many instances of attacks such as this in the months ahead, particularly when Disclosure arrives. In my view, I need to (and I believe we need to) remain centered and consult our hearts to determine which direction we wish to go in.
And, yes, I know that channels vary in their quality of reception but so do people who ply any field. We need to exercise discrimination but that is so in all matters.
(1) As represented, here, for instance: “From Darkness Unto Light” at From_Darkness_to_Lighthttp://goldengaiadb.com./From_Darkness_to_Light