Please note that I asked Archangel Michael on An Hour with an Angel on Jan. 23, 2012 if Eric Holder was guilty of crimes or conflict of interest and he confirmed that Holder is being set up. Many may not wish to accept the statement of an alleged archangel and that is fine. But I do.
Here is that exchange:
Steve: A question on Eric Holder. Is Eric Holder guilty of the crimes he’s been charged with, or a conflict of interest, or is this a cabal-mounted attack?
Archangel Michael: I will turn this question on you. One of the things that we always ask, and that we actually make a plea of, is do not ever stand in judgment, not of your own dear self, or of each other, because judgment is never of love. So if you ask me about whether certain actions took place or not, that is one question. But please let us not talk about guilt or blame or shame. Yes, there are still last-ditch efforts of those who would like to destroy credible sources. Let us leave it at that.
S: I think that does answer the question.
AAM: Yes, it does.
Predictably I’m receiving email from people who have accepted the media’s take on Eric Holder. I’m in a difficult position because I’ve neither studied the Holder file nor will I probably have time to. So I cannot express to you an unequivocal or even a well-formed opinion on the merits of the case.
But I do urge us to consider a few things before judging Holder based on multiple, rapid-fire allegations against him and before he’s had a chance to present his own case.
Remember the manner in which the dark operates.
It makes allegations which make the front page and then retracts them, if it has to, knowing the retractions will make perhaps page 12. It floods the place with allegations, making it look as if the person concerned is up to his or eyeballs in corruption. The flood of allegations raises our righteous anger.
At the least it pins down and neutralizes the person concerned. And as far as I’m aware, Eric Holder is a good person for the dark to tie down. He was Mr. Clean, as far as I knew, and he was actually doing his job. He seemed to have little fear of taking the difficult positions and prosecuting the cabal. The very charges they make against him, it seemed to me, were the very areas of his job in which he did perform.
And don’t forget the position that Eric Holder occupies: Attorney General. Is it not at least of interest that a full-scale frontal attack is mounted by Republicans, in an election year, who are at least suspected of corruption, croneyism, and favoring the rich? Is not Eric Holder the man to bring charges against them? Does not a little light bulb go on? Does that not weigh with people who consider what is transpiring?
Moreover the dark has had time to plan its attack and gather “evidence” or manufacture it. They probably timed the release of the information and placed their information in media outlets they control.
Since the false-flag attacks of 9/11, the national-security apparatus has grown exponentially and all those people who work for it are not, in my view, getting paid to protect the United States against foreign attack. That network of available agents are there, or were there in many cases, predominantly to subvert the government of the United States; in particular any honest politicians and civil servants, of which, in my opinion, Eric Holder was one.
At the least they have ensured that Eric Holder will be tied down answering the allegations against him. At the worst he will resign from Obama’s cabinet and we’ll see one more instance of a cabal-mounted political assassination that will wait as long as Kennedy’s assassination for the true story to emerge. Well, perhaps not in this case for reasons we all know.
If you believe the charges against Holder, then perhaps you also believe that CIA Director William Colby, an experienced boater, drowned in a few feet of water, his canoe weighted down with sand. (1) Or that Secretary of Defence James Forrestal leapt to his death from a hospital window and shot himself after hitting the ground – still alive. (2)
It’s very easy to buy the cabal’s own hatchet job, especially when they control the media (as Conan demonstrated pretty clearly when he showed how numerous stations read the same copy about his same-sex marriage show). (3)
Surely we have seen this kind of scenario run so many times in the past, taking out or neutralizing people who made a difference, from Carl Sagan to Patrick Fitzgerald. Folks, at the least we have to allow a person’s innocence until proven guilty. At best we should wake up to the cabal’s modus operandi and see just how much it would help them to have Eric Holder out of the way.
I know many people feel they are being sincere lightworkers in taking up the call against Eric Holder. But lightworkers can be very susceptible to manipulation exactly because of their commitment to justice. That commitment can be played upon and falsely activated by people who cannot distinguish between what is true and what false. The number of people that “Sorcha Faal” regularly dupes should be proof enough of that.
The dark depend us operating in a knee-jerk manner out of our sense of righteous indignation. But many crowds have been turned into lynch mobs by people preying on the same impulses. Let us not lynch Eric Holder and then find out years from now that it was all staged by the real culprits.
What I’m asking is that you suspend judgment until you (a) see the evidence and (b) weigh whether the sources of information are in themselves credible. Don’t jump to conclusions. The dark is expert at this kind of operation and, in the end, we are the ones who lose.
(3) Here is that video: