If you read this site (GAoG), chances are you accept the evidence of credible channeled sources.
And if you do that, then discerning between the credible and the not credible becomes not only important, but unavoidable.
I was recently asked my opinion of a website that looked at the history of creation from beginning to the present. In the interests of promoting discernment, I’d like to discuss one aspect of the site.
The site was fairly much polarized. It divided people into good and bad. This kind of argumentation I call “make-wrong” or “right/wrong.”
I maintain that this kind of argumentation is not higher, but lower, dimensional. Probably Fourth-Dimensional, at best. But not what we would think of as “higher” dimensional. And its polarization is one indication of that.
The arch-example of badness on this site was the Archangel Lucifer. It more or less pitted what it called Christ Michael – Archangel Michael – against Lucifer.
Would Archangel Michael have judged Lucifer? Would he have scolded him for dropping down into the lower densities and staying there? Would he have pitted himself against Lucifer? Let’s look into the matter as a test of the credibility of this kind of representation. Let’s ask him.
Archangel Michael discussed Lucifer in a few personal readings with me, through Linda Dillon. He said:
AAM: There is a great deal of mythology about Lucifer and those who went out on an ego expedition but what that meant was that they separated themselves via ego, via disillusionment, via separation from the essence of One.
Now we know that is not really possible but that was the reality within which they lived. Now you see that the fallen angel paradigm is very similar to what happened here with the third-dimensional human.
Many of those fallen angels were recovered and brought back into the unity fold. … And yes, I did lead that expedition, gladly! There were some who chose to remain behind. So you can think of [the situation we were discussing] as a fallen angel; as a recalcitrant angel. (1)
Michael even allowed those who wished, to stay behind. No make-wrong there.
AAM called his expedition to bring Lucifer back a journey to the heart of darkness. But it’s one he made joyously.
Perhaps remember most of us lightworkers are angels and that many of us are in Michael’s legion. Many of us journey with him at night to what he calls the heart of darkness, wherever it may be.
Either we were on the original Luciferian expedition or we’re on others which he makes because he journeys to wherever darkness prevails. He acknowledged our participation in a private reading. In this context, I believe he was referring to the war zones in various parts of our globe, like Syria and the Democratic Republic of the Congo:
AAM: When we go to the heart of darkness it is usually on a form of what you would think of as a rescue mission. … We have had much help from human beings who are part of my legion, who think they are asleep and who are working diligently with me. And then they wake up and they wonder why they are so exhausted.
SB: That rings a bell
AAM: Does it not?
SB: It does. [laughs]
AAM: So I do not go alone. We do not go on these missions alone. You have the saying on Earth, safety in numbers. Well, it came from us. (2)
I’ll post his account of his journeys to the heart of darkness in a companion article, so as not to make this one too long. (3) Again there’s no make-wrong in what Archangel Michael did with or said to Lucifer.
He also remarked to “K” in a personal reading:
AAM: My job has never been about pointing fingers, never. I have gone and I have brought Lucifer back to the Mother. Do you really think I scolded him all the way home? (4)
No, I don’t. He added: “What you tend to think in duality is that one is right, one is wrong.” (5) Exactly. In his own words.
Fifth-Dimensional sources and higher simply don’t think in these ways. To me that crucial refusal to engage in right/wrong is one major indication of a credible, higher-dimensional channeled message.
Those channeled messages that feature make-wrong (and some prominent channels do) should, I believe, be treated with circumspection. And if any of those channels are listening, I’d ask them to please reject a source who speaks in right/wrong.
Are my hands clean? Do I make people wrong? More often than I care to admit. Sometimes I do it out of ignorance. I’m usually asleep, low awareness. Sometimes I do it out of self-servingness. I’m wanting to pump myself up by showing how far I stand above the other person. Sometimes I do it out of a feeling of repugnance for something. I’m behaving self-righteously.
My only claim here is that I’m telling you about my here and now – the good the bad, and the ugly – not that I’ve somehow reached a level of integrity I haven’t. Gawd, I shock myself with what sometimes comes out of my mouth. Banal, prejudiced, superficial. Eeek!
Usually it’s hidden from me, but given some of the folks I’m hanging around with these days, the room for improvement becomes crystal clear.
(1) Archangel Michael in a personal reading with Steve Beckow through Linda Dillon, Jan. 23, 2015.
(2) AAM to Steve, Oct. 11, 2011. Linda and Archangel Michael offered me a surprise reading on my birthday (Oct. 11) that year. What a wonderful gift.
(3) “Journeys to the Heart of Darkness” at http://goldenageofgaia.com/?p=274323
(4) Archangel Michael in a personal reading with K through Linda Dillon, Dec. 11, 2012.
(5) Loc. cit.