The View from the Ground

It may take time for deep cynicism to subside

I’m reading some NESARA comments on an Earth ally/whistleblower/insider blog and marvelling at the difference in content and perspective between that genre of commentary and one that relies on the Company of Heaven.

The former worries that the banks that administer NESARA will be the same gang of crooks that brought us debt slavery, etc. Without knowing about containment, I can see why that thought might be there for them. (1) But containment has altered the behavior of many financial leaders; Jamie Dimon is a case in point.

The former discuss such matters as the insurance products of the future, investment products, etc. I scratch my head over comments like these. I do understand that the economy will continue for some time in a manner somewhat similar to what it does now, but soon enough it will veer away from the market model we live under at this time. To project the present system into the future seems to me to miss the point of the new economy.

The former discuss the prosperity packages, re-evaluations, St. Germaine Trust, etc., as if NESARA is so many streams of income, people benefiting from one but perhaps not from another. I can understand how someone might think that way, but, it seems to me, NESARA is an integrated program and not separate streams of income benefiting different people differently. If NESARA was to lead to more income inequality, how is it NESARA?

The former worry that the new governments will be run by the same crooks and new laws enforced by the same thugs as now (their words). Without a knowledge of the rising energies and their impact on us, I can see how one might see the situation this way, but such a view doesn’t take into account what’s actually happening on the planet and what the Company of Heaven is regularly saying about it.

The former speculate that the same CEOs will be running the companies, people will have no say in matters, corporate capitalism will survive and run the new economy, etc. Surely the “insider” analysis simply projects into the future what’s here now. Where’s an appreciation of what’s “new” in the “new economy”? Where’s an appreciation of our gradual ascension, expansion, and transformation?

The former stress “knowing,” but in fact what they go by is largely speculation. Heavens, we speculate too. Not saying we don’t. But we don’t try to pretend that we “know.”

In this view, President Obama plays a peripheral role as either a person who at best assisted the light or at worst will be swept aside in the new scheme of things. As crimped and confined as he’s been since elected, I think we’ll see his role blossom, probably soon.

For me (I almost said “for my money”), only going by intel on the ground doesn’t give one a sound basis for really estimating what’s coming down the pike. Rather than speculating on what the St. Germaine Trust will do, why not listen to St. Germaine? He speaks. If he orchestrated the St. Germaine World Trust while outside the body, does it not make sense that he would still be here and available for comment?

I’ve refrained from saying these things because I haven’t wanted to risk a light war but I think I do want to say now that the “guys in the rafters,” as Poof calls them, are working on a new economic and political system that goes very, very far beyond what the “insiders” may realize. It’s time to consider what the guys in the rafters are saying and to let go of some of the heavy cynicism we have about what’s coming down the pike.

Much insider information chooses to remain within the empirical-materialist paradigm, where only what you can see and hear is considered real. That would seem to rule out listening to what unseen sources have to say, which includes the galactics, ascended masters and celestials. That would deprive me of sources and resources that are too valuable to ignore. I don’t want to go there, personally.

The guys in the rafters have gone to the trouble of seeking out channels of communication and regularly updating us on their and our progress. Why ignore what they say in favor of intel sources who, contrary to claims being made, don’t seem to know what’s being brought to us?