By now we may be seeing that the vaccines are intended to create a vehicle for mind control, for eliminating the immune system, and for killing on a mass scale – that is, to depopulate the globe and render the survivors controllable.
In my opinion, the Covid vaccine is a bioweapon and a weapon of mass destruction. It’s our job, I think, to put a stop to it asap.
And we will – gradually, peacefully, and legally.
The latest from Simon Parkes, Mel K. and Charlie Ward
Floods in Montevideo, Uruguay’s capital.
Apparently, JFK Jr. is Q. Or probably more precisely the head of the Q Team.
Thanks to Geoff.
Dr. True describes Hydra Linnaeus / Hydra Vulgarus, found in the Pfizer vaccine, in detail in this video.
ICU Nurse “Real Scared” over Losing Job, Career
And so they should!
Japanese Government Tells Citizens: “Don’t Discriminate Against the Unvaccinated”
Paul Jospeh Watson, Summit News, Dec. 21, 2021
(https://summit.news/2021/12/21/japanese-government-tells-citizens-dont-discriminate-against-the-unvaccinated/)
“Do not force anyone” to get the jab
Despite numerous major countries making COVID-19 vaccines mandatory, the Japanese government has told its citizens “do not discriminate against those who have not been vaccinated.”
Germany is set to follow Austria by imposing mandatory jabs, with refuseniks who still resist taking them facing escalating fines and eventually prison sentences.
However, Japan is taking a very different approach, asserting that vaccines should only ever be administered with full consent and that they shouldn’t be used as tools of coercion or intimidation.
The following notice was posted on the website for the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare;
“Although we encourage all citizens to receive the COVID-19 vaccination, it is not compulsory or mandatory. Vaccination will be given only with the consent of the person to be vaccinated after the information provided. Please get vaccinated of your own decision, understanding both the effectiveness in preventing infectious diseases and the risk of side effects. No vaccination will be given without consent. Please do not force anyone in your workplace or those who around you to be vaccinated, and do not discriminate against those who have not been vaccinated.”
The Prime Minister’s website also contains a similar statement.
“Vaccines will never be administered without the recipient’s consent. We urge the public never to coerce vaccinations at the workplace or upon others around them, and never to treat those who have not received the vaccine in a discriminatory manner.”
Meanwhile, in Austria, the government is literally hiring people to ‘hunt down’ those who refuse to take the jab.
“Western countries still claim to be the foremost defenders of civil liberties,” writes Noah Carl. “But in the era of Covid safetyism, it seems that mantle has passed to Japan. Perhaps the country will send a delegation of human rights experts to teach the West about individual freedom.”
Health Official Admits There is No Transmission in Gyms:
“closing down businesses is meant to create an incentive to vaccinate”
 |
|||
|
|
|||
Take Heart: Justice is on the Move
For Reflection
Longer articles appear here.
A cautionary tale about vaccinating your children
Linda Slobodian, Western Standard, Dec. 21, 2021
(https://westernstandardonline.com/2021/12/slobodian-a-cautionary-tale-about-vaccinating-your-children/)
Felicity has since had trouble walking. She’s weak. Initial chest pains increased in severity. She’s undergoing tests for possible heart damage.
“We chalked it up to being nervous. I took her for a Slurpee after and within three hours she was all right,” her mother Laura Patton told Western Standard.
Felicity felt fine when she walked into the Selkirk COVID-19 Supersite for a second vaccine on July 27.
But she couldn’t walk out.
And so began a nightmare that continues.
Felicity has since had trouble walking. She’s weak. Initial chest pains increased in severity. She’s undergoing tests for possible heart damage.
“She’s having issues with her heart. We don’t know why yet,” said Patton. “Myocarditis happens right away. Pericarditis after the vaccine can take longer to develop.”
Patton’s speaking out to raise awareness.
“Parents have to know. They’re (health officials) saying the risks outweigh the benefits for this age group. Think hard before taking your healthy child to get vaccinated.
“If I had the information I have now, there’s no way I’d have had her vaccinated,” said Patton, who lives in East St. Paul, a rural municipality adjacent to Winnipeg.
The adverse reaction to that second dose was immediate.
“She said ‘Oh mom, I need to lie down.’ She did lie down on the floor. She passed out for about 45 seconds. She couldn’t stand up. We kept trying to get her up. She couldn’t support her weight,” said Patton.
Medical staff rushed into the room.
“They kept saying: ‘This isn’t because of the vaccine.’ I said: ‘We literally walked in here an hour ago and she was completely fine.”
The site manager helped Patton get Felicity to the car.
“It got worse. She’d basically go to bed or crawl to the couch. Only being able to crawl lasted two weeks. Then she started to walk with a cane.”
Five days after the jab Felicity was finally able to eat.
“Then she took a turn for the worse. She was super-nauseous, had a fever. We were on the phone with HealthLinks. We were pretty much talking to them every day. They told us to call an ambulance.”
A neurologist at Winnipeg Children’s Hospital assessed Felicity.
“The neurologist wasn’t really concerned, believing it would go away. She wasn’t paralyzed. She just didn’t have any strength in her legs. It was the same old follow-up with your doctor kind of thing.”
There have been so many trips to doctors it’s a blur.
“At some point you realize they really can’t help us. Everyone’s so afraid to say it’s the vaccine which makes it harder because people don’t even want to talk to you.”
Searching for answers, Patton had Felicity tested for COVID-19. It was negative.
When she was inactive, the chest pains that started after the injection were rare. The more she was able to move, the worse they got.
She received a heart event monitor November 22.
“Two weeks ago, she had a four-hour bout of severe chest pains. It knocked her flat. She couldn’t breathe.
“Last week she was at the hospital Monday, Tuesday and Thursday. The EKGs (electrocardiograms) were fine. The chest X-ray was fine. The blood work was fine.”
On Wednesday she got another heart event monitor.
“They said she should keep it for six weeks or 10 incidents. She had 10 incidents the first day.”
Felicity takes Advil and Tylenol four times daily to dull the pain.
Patton believes the cool reaction from some health workers may be influenced by the fact that Felicity is autistic, has ADHA, and suffers bouts of anxiety.
“They’re so quick to dismiss people with mental health challenges. I’ve been dealing with her panic attacks for 13 years. This is not that. She has high-functioning autism.”
Felicity’s service dog Dakota grounds her when she gets overwhelmed. A psychiatrist helps work through the anxiety.
“COVID-19 has been hard because she lost her normal routines. She’s doing better now with the help of the psychiatrist. They were meeting every three or four weeks. Now it’s every three months.”
In August, the psychiatrist wrote a letter to Felicity’s pediatrician saying autism wasn’t the cause of her health problems.
The doctor reported it as an adverse vaccine reaction.
“We were probably six visits between the hospital and him before he said it had to be reported. Health people I’ve talked to said it’s a miracle it was reported.”
Winnipeg Regional Health Authority (WRHA) called soon after.
“They wanted to know if they could follow up with her after she had a booster. My husband swore. What makes them think we would ever take her for a booster?”
Felicity was able to start Grade 10 at Exchange MET School on time, walking with a cane.
“She never had health problems. Now we must figure out what’s going on with her heart. It’s getting worse.”
Patton gets frustrated when she sees ads promoting COVID-19 vaccines for children.
“They’re not telling parents everything. When you see them (health officials) on the news, it seems you can see on their faces that they know more than what they’re saying. It’s like they sold their souls.”
Manitoba Health’s website states: “After being immunized your child may have little to no reaction… Serious reactions rarely occur.”
“One hospital nurse told us ‘You’d be hard-pressed to find somebody here who’d get their kids vaccinated.”
One health worker confirmed to Western Standard that HealthLinks receives calls from parents with children having “brutal” vaccine reactions.
“COVID-19 isn’t really affecting kids. I don’t know why we’re vaccinating kids. I get that there might be immunocompromised kids. Then absolutely. But don’t just blanket approve it.’
Patton has no doubt about why her daughter is sick.
“I’m 100% convinced it’s because of the vaccine.”
“Felicity says ‘I’m going to be fine, right?’ We say ‘Yup.’ But we don’t know.”
Ivermectin Prophylaxis Used for COVID-19: A Citywide, Prospective, Observational Study of 223,128 Subjects Using Propensity Score Matching
Lucy Kerr, Flavio A. Cadegiani, Fernando Baldi, Raysildo B. Lobo, Washington Luiz O. Assagra, Fernando Carlos Proença, Pierre Kory, Jennifer A. Hibberd, Juan J. Chamie-Quintero
Abstract
Background: Ivermectin has demonstrated different mechanisms of action that potentially protect from both coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and COVID-19-related comorbidities. Based on the studies suggesting efficacy in prophylaxis combined with the known safety profile of ivermectin, a citywide prevention program using ivermectin for COVID-19 was implemented in Itajaí, a southern city in Brazil in the state of Santa Catarina. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of regular ivermectin use on subsequent COVID-19 infection and mortality rates.
Materials and methods: We analyzed data from a prospective, observational study of the citywide COVID-19 prevention with ivermectin program, which was conducted between July 2020 and December 2020 in Itajaí, Brazil. Study design, institutional review board approval, and analysis of registry data occurred after completion of the program. The program consisted of inviting the entire population of Itajaí to a medical visit to enroll in the program and to compile baseline, personal, demographic, and medical information.
In the absence of contraindications, ivermectin was offered as an optional treatment to be taken for two consecutive days every 15 days at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day. In cases where a participating citizen of Itajaí became ill with COVID-19, they were recommended not to use ivermectin or any other medication in early outpatient treatment. Clinical outcomes of infection, hospitalization, and death were automatically reported and entered into the registry in real time. Study analysis consisted of comparing ivermectin users with non-users using cohorts of infected patients propensity score-matched by age, sex, and comorbidities. COVID-19 infection and mortality rates were analyzed with and without the use of propensity score matching (PSM).
Results: Of the 223,128 citizens of Itajaí considered for the study, a total of 159,561 subjects were included in the analysis: 113,845 (71.3%) regular ivermectin users and 45,716 (23.3%) non-users. Of these, 4,311 ivermectin users were infected, among which 4,197 were from the city of Itajaí (3.7% infection rate), and 3,034 non-users (from Itajaí) were infected (6.6% infection rate), with a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate (risk ratio [RR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.53-0.58; p < 0.0001).
Using PSM, two cohorts of 3,034 subjects suffering from COVID-19 infection were compared. The regular use of ivermectin led to a 68% reduction in COVID-19 mortality (25 [0.8%] versus 79 [2.6%] among ivermectin non-users; RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.49; p < 0.0001). When adjusted for residual variables, reduction in mortality rate was 70% (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.19-0.46; p < 0.0001). There was a 56% reduction in hospitalization rate (44 versus 99 hospitalizations among ivermectin users and non-users, respectively; RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31-0.63; p < 0.0001). After adjustment for residual variables, reduction in hospitalization rate was 67% (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 023-0.66; p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: In this large PSM study, regular use of ivermectin as a prophylactic agent was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality rates.
Published: January 15, 2022 (see history)
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.21272
Cite this article as: Kerr L, Cadegiani F A, Baldi F, et al. (January 15, 2022) Ivermectin Prophylaxis Used for COVID-19: A Citywide, Prospective, Observational Study of 223,128 Subjects Using Propensity Score Matching. Cureus 14(1): e21272. doi:10.7759/cureus.21272
Greek special forces and U.S. Navy Seals amphibious assault a beach during Sarisa 16, an annual Greek exercise, near Thessaloniki, Greece, Sept. 19, 2016. (U.S. Army photo by Staff Sgt. Marcus Fichtl)
Judge Blocks Navy’s Discipline of SEALs for Refusing the COVID-19 Vaccine
Patricia Kime, Military.com, Jan. 4, 2022
(https://www.military.com/daily-news/2022/01/04/judge-blocks-navys-discipline-of-seals-refusing-covid-19-vaccine.html)
A federal judge has ordered the Navy and Defense Department to halt disciplinary procedures against 35 members of the service’s special operations community for refusing to take the COVID-19 vaccine — a move that could complicate the Pentagon’s immunization mandate.
U.S. District Court Judge Reed O’Connor, with the Northern District of Texas in Fort Worth, ruled Monday that the DoD has violated the sailors’ constitutional right to refuse the vaccine based on their religious beliefs.
According to the order from Reed, “there is no military exclusion from our Constitution.”
“The COVID-19 pandemic provides the government no license to abrogate those freedoms. There is no COVID-19 exception to the First Amendment,” O’Connor wrote in a 26-page order.
The 35 sailors are not named in the lawsuit, citing privacy and a threat to national and operational security. They include 26 enlisted or chief warrant Navy Sea, Air and Land, or SEAL, members, five enlisted special warfare combatant craft crew members, three enlisted Navy divers and an enlisted explosive ordnance disposal technician.
The plaintiffs objected to any vaccines that were developed from aborted fetal cell lines or that “modified” their bodies — “an affront to the Creator,” they wrote in their suit filed in November.
While the vaccines were developed with cell lines descended from fetuses aborted in the 1970s and 1980s, they contain no aborted fetal tissue.
The plaintiffs also argued they have received “direct, divine instruction not to receive the vaccine” and oppose “injecting trace amounts of animal cells into one’s body.”
While the majority of the plaintiffs did not address the fact that the Pentagon requires service members to receive numerous vaccines, including the anthrax vaccine for special operators in some environments, one sailor said he experienced negative side effects from a previous vaccination and “came to regret” it, seeing vaccines as a “defilement of his body.”
“Through prayer and reflection, this plaintiff has determined that receiving a COVID-19 vaccine similarly would defile his body,” according to the lawsuit.
In the complaint, plaintiffs attorneys also cited a Military.com report on a rare side effect of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine — heart inflammation known as myocarditis and pericarditis — as a reason for their clients not wanting the vaccine.
The complication also can occur as the result of a COVID-19 infection.
While acknowledging that COVID-19 has killed more than 80 service members since the beginning of the pandemic, O’Connor said the court “does not make light of COVID-19’s impact on the military.”
But, he said, the Navy’s religious exemption process has been “theatre” to date, noting that no exemptions have been granted.
“The facts overwhelmingly indicate that the Navy will deny the religious accommodations,” O’Connor wrote. “The Navy has, to date, never granted a religious accommodation request for the COVID-19 vaccine. In fact, in the past seven years, the Navy has never granted a single religious exemption for any vaccine.”
The sailors, who hail from Catholic, Eastern Orthodox and Protestant Christian backgrounds, filed their lawsuit through the First Liberty Institute, a nonprofit that serves to defend religious freedom.
Their attorney, Michael Berry, is a former Marine Corps judge advocate general who deployed to Afghanistan in 2008 and continues to serve in the Marine Corps Reserve, according to the institute’s website.
“Forcing a service member to choose between their faith and serving their country is abhorrent to the Constitution and America’s values,” Berry said in a statement released Monday. “Punishing SEALs for simply asking for a religious accommodation is purely vindictive and punitive.”
No major religions oppose COVID-19 vaccinations, including the Roman Catholic Church, whose leader, Pope Francis, has called receiving it an “act of love” that is consistent with the faith.
Leaders of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America said in September “there is no exemption in the Orthodox Church for Her faithful from any vaccination for religious reasons.”
And leaders in the Baptist faith, the largest Protestant denomination in the U.S., have said they support vaccination but oppose mandates. Danny Akin, president of the Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, told the Baptist Press in September that he believes “getting vaccinated is in the best interest of national health.”
“However, an emergency mandate through regulatory action by the Department of Labor is the government trespassing on civil liberties,” Akin said, referring to President Joe Biden’s mandate for federal workers, contractors and private employers.
The lawsuit is one of several filed that have been filed against Biden, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro and the Defense Department seeking to halt the vaccine mandate, which was ordered by Austin in August.
More than 1.9 million U.S. service members, including members of the Reserve and National Guard, have received vaccines for COVID-19. At least 96% of the active-duty Navy, Army and Air Force were fully vaccinated by their services’ respective deadlines. As of Dec. 22, 95% of active-duty Marines had received at least one dose.
The services have processes for requesting medical and religious exemptions. To date, a few hundred have received medical exemptions, mainly with the recommendations of a physician, and no religious exemptions have been approved.
The Air Force began discharging personnel after its Nov. 2 deadline passed, with 27 airmen dismissed the week of the deadline. The Marine Corps has separated 206 Marines for refusing the vaccine.
There have been 261,504 cases of COVID-19 among U.S. service members since the beginning of the pandemic in February 2020 and 82 deaths.
During a press conference at the Pentagon on Tuesday, spokesman John Kirby said he could not comment specifically on the order, given that it is part of ongoing litigation.
“We are aware, of course, and we are reviewing it and discussing it with the Department of Justice to determine what options are available to us going forward,” Kirby said.
O’Connor was nominated to the federal bench in June 2007 by President George W. Bush. He has a history of rulings against Democratic policies and mandates, the most notable occurring in late 2018 when he declared the Affordable Care Act unconstitutional.
That ruling was upheld by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit but was reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court in a 7-2 decision, dissented only by Associate Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch.
Please note: The ICLCJ is distinct from the International Court of Justice in the Hague.
The ICLCJ, as far as I know, has no legal standing. Their “common-law verdicts” have only persuasive value.
The ICLCJ was the organization that brought the Canadian residential schools genocide to the world’s attention.
When the ICLCJ started, no court in the world, I believe, would touch the subjects they were “adjudicating.” It doesn’t seem fair to me to hold them to procedures and standards that are proper only to a court of law.
Here is their website: (https://commonlaw.earth/iclcj-verdict-and-sentence/)
Verdict and Sentence of the International Common Law Court on Big Pharma et al.
Download here: https://goldenageofgaia.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Verdict-and-Sentence-of-the-International-Common-Law-Court-of-Justice.pdf