Actually not everyone, thank heaven. Although we don’t hear it said very often, it’s a natural outgrowth of 9/11 truth that everyone who realizes that 9/11 was a false-flag operation must also realize that that “Muslims” as Muslims had nothing to do with that operation.
A few Muslims were part of the scenario and more about that later. But they were not participants because they were radical Islamists but rather as props of the people who did engineer 9/11.
Once a person realizes that “9/11 was an inside job,” they must also realize that the “War on Terror,” which postulates a risk from militant Islam, is also an inside job.
Why it’s so important to realize that 9/11 was the invention of people like President George W. Bush, Vice-President Dick Cheney and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld is that, like AIDS, 9/11 is the gift that keeps on giving. Muslims, having been blamed for the day’s events, are discriminated against from that day onward, even though they had nothing to do with the original attack.
I’ve written the subject up elsewhere, and leave the footnoted references to those articles, (1) but here I just wish to cover some events in an informal manner.
At every point where the 9/11 cover story is examined, it falls apart. If we look at where the 9/11 mastermind, Osama bin Laden, was on Sept. 11, 2001, we find CBS’s Dan Rather announcing that he was in a Rawalpindi hospital recovering from dialysis treatment the day before. Yet bin Laden is portrayed in the cover story (and taped) as being in a cave in Afghanistan gloating over the success of the operation.
Again, bin Laden was known to have been in a Dubai hospital two months prior to 9/11, where he was visited by the local CIA chief. Remember that bin Laden was wanted at the time for the Kenyan embassy bombings. Nothing came of the meeting – no arrest, no attempt to harm, no request of the Dubai government to detain, nothing.
Bin Laden has never been charged regarding 9/11 – why? Because those charges would have had to go before a grand jury and be substantiated? No unnecessary digging into events was wanted.
Given that the cabal curtailed and derailed the original 9/11 Commission, why would they risk convening a second? Given that they haven’t released anything of all the videotapes at the Pentagon except a few indecisive seconds, why would they create an inquiry that might demand their release?
Bin Laden himself is likely to have died in late 2001, at the latest in early 2002. Benazir Bhutto may have been assassinated in part because she discussed his death, his murderer, and his funeral. Yet even today we hear a raft of American officials say that bin Laden lives. Why?
Of the nineteen alleged hijackers, six were found alive after 9/11 in Saudi Arabia and Morocco. The Saudi government presented its findings of their continued existence to George Bush, who acknowledged it, though the matter received no media coverage.
They could not have been aboard the planes, which were all allegedly destroyed, and yet be alive afterwards. Their continued existence belies the theory that four planes were commandeered by Muslim hijackers and crashed into targets killing all aboard.
Waleed al-Shehri worked as a pilot in Morocco and turned himself in to authorities after 9/11 to give the lie to allegations that he was aboard Flight 11 and had stabbed a stewardess before the plane crashed into the World Trade Center North Tower.
How likely is it that the planes themselves blew up in the World Trade Center and yet the passport of one of the hijackers could have been recovered from a New York street without any disfiguring burn marks, etc.? It’s probably impossible, never mind implausible and improbable.
No Muslim names, as far as I’m aware, appear on the flight manifests of any of the planes connected with 9/11. Since the alleged Arab terrorists were sitting among the passengers, how could they have gotten aboard? No explanation has ever been offered about assumed identities. The problem presented by this situation has never been addressed or explained.
We cannot say that no Muslims were involved with 9/11. A Pakistani ISI general accepted $100,000 from American officials said to be destined for “Mohamed Atta.” He is at least one Muslim involved in 9/11. But he is hardly a Muslim terrorist, even if he was one of the minor architects of the “war on terror,” along with his major American colleagues.
On and on the holes in the cover story go. Only one conclusion can be reached. Nineteen Arab hijackers were not responsible for 9/11. And yet on the basis of that allegation hangs all future developments in the establishment and prosecution of a “War on Terror.”
One episode of future “terrorism” after another has been revealed by our sources as false-flag operations using mind-controlled Manchurian candidates – the London bombing, the Oklahoma City bombing, the Christmas Day bomber, etc.
Carol Rosin exposed the war against terror as one of a number of scenarios the military-industrial complex devised as far back as the 1970s to keep the United States more or less on a permanent war footing. (2)
These made-up scenarios were designed to accomplish many things – to perpetuate the financial gain of the military-industrial complex, to cause the rise of the national-security state, to whittle down the constitutional rights of Americans, to bring the country under martial law. to allow a takeover by what President George H.W. Bush called the “New World Order,” and to allow the Illuminati to bring the population down from 7 billion worldwide to 500 million.
But very few people accept these seemingly-outrageous statements. They prefer to blame Muslims for something the latter had no part in.
So to the woman who says that everybody knows that Muslims are trying to kill Americans, no, I’m afraid what you know is only what you’ve been led to know by a group of traitors who came very close to taking over your own government as a result of their treasonous actions. All your hatred of Muslims is based on falsehoods and fabrications.
While the 9/11 cover-up may persist for a while longer in the United States, it is much better known in Europe and other parts of the world. It is only a question of time before the true history of that period is revealed.
And when it is, we’ll need to apologize to American Muslims and worldwide Islam for the fabrications that were floated and the ill treatment that was meted out to innocent people.
We could begin the healing process by refusing any longer to accept the lie that Muslims were responsible for 9/11.
(1) See for instance:
- In the Name of All Who Died on 9/11, We Must Act Now
- What War on Terror?
- This 9/11, It’s Time to Apologize to Muslims
- To Muslims of America, I Apologize
- “Ground Zero Mosque” and 9/11
- The “Demonization” of Muslims and the Battle for Oil (2007)
(2) See Carol Rosin before the Disclosure Project, May 2001: