There have been other allegations that some “assassinations” used actors who were not hurt, etc. But the Boston Marathon definitely was not one of them. While it appears to have been a false flag, it did have casualties. Here is Matthew Ward on that black operation:
“The Illuminati-controlled faction of the CIA still is active in terrorism, at times in conjunction with law enforcement personnel who unwittingly are abetting rather than capturing the perpetrators. In addition to using the few remaining mind-controlled individuals whom they have programmed, the faction has a list of ‘likely’ persons to blame for their terrorist activities. They fabricate a plausible foundation around selective facts about those individuals and feed that story to the media.
“The bombing at the Boston marathon was their handiwork. The two brothers ‘alleged’ to be the bombers fit very well what the faction needed for that occasion. They had learned about the young men’s interest in simple bomb construction and, tying that to their ‘radical’ religious convictions and the older brother’s months in Chechnya and Dagestan, they created ‘suspects’ that the public would find believable.” (1)
James’s version gets no support from Matthew.
James does not use Perro, uses ad hominem arguments to work on people’s emotions, argues by labelling and repetition, and has many other features which take him outside the standards of the blog.
However the thrust of where he’s going is groundbreaking and the articles are history unto themselves. They are an integral part of the massive revelation of the cabal’s activities that we know is occurring.
Another example of Veterans Today making history is Gordon Duff’s speech at the terrorism conference in Syria a year or two ago. It laid bare to attendees of global stature the true sources and causes of terrorism. VT is leading the fray, whether their articles are admirable from many standpoints or not.
I haven’t in the past excised portions of opinion pieces like these, (2) such as taking out James’ allegation that the Boston Marathon and Sandy Hook saw no victims/casualties. Usually one prints them in whole or not. I should have added a note at the beginning however.
We’ll reassess whether posting the whole of James’s articles in future does more harm than good. Or posting them at all.
We may in future, print a paragraph or two of a particularly ground-breaking article and refer readers to the VT site for the rest, with a “discernment is required” proviso, as we did today with James’ article on the Department of Homeland Security. The article itself is provocative: Calling for the disbandment of DHS puts anyone on their hit list, I’m sure.
His articles do demonstrate very clearly the difference between gathering information from “insider” sources and from channeled sources. If a channeled source wrote like this, we’d never print it and I’d never draw on it in my articles.
Just exactly what happened with James’ article is a major reason why I preferred long ago to go with channeled material. Insider material for me is often such a mixture of truth and polemics. Generally I let others cover it.
James is not the only insider source that writes in fluorid style and doesn’t seem to pay the kind of close attention we’d like to factuality. With other insider commentators too we need to use discernment.
(1) Matthew’s Message, May 12, 2013, at http://www.matthewbooks.com/mattsmessage.htm
(2) With the exception of Zap’s.
To Steve Beckow,
I wish to address the recent post titled “Exposed, the American ISIS Nexus”
I am a resident of Boston. I am very grateful not to have been at the marathon that horrendous day, but I am very personally connected because my husband is a [X] police officer and many of our friends are too. Most of them were there that tragic day, and I am very disturbed by the claims made in the article.
I am referring to the statement:
“The Boston Bombing used a black powder puffer bomb which harmed no-one. It was another DHS drill using crisis actors with prior amputations and fake blood. The proof of this is frankly overwhelming if one checks all of the available facts.”
This is a complete falsehood!!
My friends were there picking up the injured and dead, having to step over severed limbs of REAL PEOPLE!!
They were surrounded by REAL BLOOD!! and REAL TRAUMA!! That is a fact!!
My husband was there at the [Y] shoot out, and those pipe bombs that landed near him were REAL!! If it weren’t for his cruiser between him and the pipe bombs he would have been very seriously injured!
Putting up misinformation like this is very irresponsible, and it hurts your and your site’s credibility. I was very disappointed when I read that.
But it is so much more than irresponsible, it is hurtful and disrespectful to those who were in any way affected by the events of that week.
It truly shocked me that a short paragraph of unsubstantiated words like that could be so dismissive of pain and hardship that has been felt and endured by so many, so dismissive of lives lost and families torn apart.
It made me think of Maya Angelou. She said that ‘words are things’, and contemplation of that brought me to think of words as tools, tools that need to be respected and recognized as such.
Just as carpenter’s tools can be used for creating beautiful things or used for demolition, words are tools that can be used for creation or for destruction.
Those words served only to dishonor the people affected throughout that terrible ordeal, whereas they deserve only words of comfort and compassion, and a world where we use our words to create beauty, peace, harmony and love.