Just a word about channels.
There are channels we don’t post. Sometimes it’s because we don’t have room for all channels, even though the channel’s work may be quite reliable. We also may feel that the subject matter is covered off by other channels and not post what seems to be duplicated.
Sometimes it may be because we consult Archangel Michael regularly, whenever we spot a problem with an existing channel, and he gives us what’s true about the situation.
But it would only start a light war for us to discuss the matter publicly.
Many people have written about a particular channel recently that we don’t post. Please understand that we won’t be discussing the matter. That same channel is available on many other blogs so it isn’t as if you’ll be deprived of their work. But we won’t be posting it here.
The same applies to some other lightworker groups who may even have a wide following. Usually we’ve been advised of problems. Some of these groups have imploded over time under the weight of contradictions.
I recall one “insider” gentleman in particular who made false claims about the government agency he said he was representing. We were warned that his claims were untrue and stopped posting him. He’s no longer around, as far as I know. And so it goes.
I personally haven’t the time available, I’m afraid, to answer 50 letters all asking why we don’t post a certain channel, even if I was willing to disclose the reason. My hope is that you understand that we do use our discernment, try to offer you the best material available, and generally err on the side of caution when posting channels, etc. (1)
(1) I made myself the promise years ago that, given that channeled material was not widely acceptable under the best of circumstances at the time, if there were problems with a channel I would not post them to ensure that the database (at the time, New Maps of Heaven) remained irreproachable.