An article has been published in which Georgi Stankov alleges that I’ve written a piece explaining certain matters relating to the Mayan Calendar, etc., which he then goes on to dispute.
After refuting the points, the author goes on to say:
“Therefore, forget all indignant Steve Beckows – they are well placed in the company of avaricious Reptilians. Forget also Wilcock and Co, who have never bothered to reflect on the nature of space-time and produce a decent scientific concept in their whole life.
“If you follow such false prophets, it is your fault. You will be also dumbed down. This is the sad reality on this planet, and the only way out of it, is to realize this deplorable truth. Any kind of false indignation on the part of the ego is completely wrong at this place. Change your ego first and then start thinking in correct scientific terms.”
Just for the record, I am not the author of the article in question. I don’t actually know at this moment what article is being referred to or who the author actually is.
Georgi does not give a citation that would allow me to go to the article in question and read it. I don’t feel I should be obliged to do the research needed to track down something I’m alleged to have written and have not written,
I know very little about the Mayan Calendar and certainly not enough to write about it. I have no scientific background with which to assess the points made against me or to rebut them. I am a social student, not a scientific student.
I have no idea what lies behind the attacks. So far the allegations made against me, such as one in an earlier article that I claim to have written articles that I haven’t written, have no basis in fact.
I have never claimed to have written an article I have not written. The idea has never occurred to me and never would.
There is nothing I can do to stop these attacks and I don’t like to defend myself ordinarily. But when articles are being attributed to me that I have nothing to do with, I feel I need to set the record straight.