I long for the day when the truth of events such as were covered in the article “Assassinations in America” is known.
It isn’t fun being suspected of being either a crackpot or a person of low discernment. I’m sure you know the feeling.
The pursuit of the truth exposes us to ridicule. But why would we give up as much as we do merely to cause a sensation or feed an intrigue?
I’m not interested in it, personally. Here is an exchange of comments on that article. I left the comments on by mistake. Usually I turn them off.
Submitted on 2011/07/28
JFK, Jr.’s plane was not blown up. Why should it be and where did you get that story? He drove the plane into the ocean himself and when it was recovered all the bodies were intact and strapped into their seats. Tim Russert suffered a fatal heart attack at his desk on the job. Again, where do you get this stuff? If he was murdered then it had to be by someone who could manage to give him a drug while at work which would exactly simulate a fatal heart attack. You know, sometimes your stuff gets a little too carried away with intrigue!
I wish I was carried away a little by intrigue, but I don’t think I and the sources I rely on are. I personally have sacrificed my employability and risked my life to put out some of the things I’ve learned, such as the extent of Illuminati destruction through pandemics, weather warfare, chemtrails, financial manipulations, and so on. Why would I risk my life for mere “intrigue”?
I’ve pointed out to Americans that Muslims were not responsible for 9/11. Their own government was. Why risk the ridicule and harm that can come from that to merely publicize an “intrigue”? I think you’ll have to look a little deeper than that if you want to understand why we say these things. A commitment to human rights and freedom may be closer to the mark.
You may not accept our sources but they are quite definite about these situations.
Here is Matthew Ward, for instance, on Tim Russert:
“The greatly respected journalist Tim Russert was investigating too deeply into areas where dark minds were operating, and like many others who also ventured into those pits of deception and corruption and could expose the facts, his life was abruptly ended. In this case, technology that can kill a body instantly without contact was used; in other situations fast-growing cancer has been technologically caused. In neither type of death is foul play normally suspected, unlike the suspicions aroused by claims of ‘suicide’ or the unlikely ‘accidents’ that befall people who uncover what the Illuminati and those they influence want to keep hidden.” (Matthew’s Message, July 4, 2008, at http://www.matthewbooks.com/mm/anmviewer.asp?a=89.)
Your conclusion that the dose would have to be given him at work is not correct. But if I told you who is said to have done it, I don’t think you’d believe me.
Kat has cited sources on John Kennedy, Jr.
I’m interested in the truth, Carol. And that search has led to places that many people in society won’t go. But, in time, the entire truth of this era will be known and, when it is, you may find yourself shocked. Given that that time is not so far off, why not leave matters an open question? You’ll have your answers soon.