I’ve just received an email from a major lightworker in Austria who has dropped coverage of Ben Fulford after Ben’s latest article. Among other things, Ben alleges that the Dalai Lama was switched at birth , etc., etc.
He may be right about the Dalai Lama; he may be wrong. But attacking a figure like that at a time like this, in my view, will only split lightworkers and is a regrettable choice.
I agree with the lightworker. I don’t want to mention his name because I don’t want to cause any heartache or backlash on anyone’s part, but most people will probably know who I’m referring to. The lightworker himself does great work and has been responsible for many breakthroughs.
Turning to Ben, I find his material these days to be confusing. It seems to wander into byways that divide us instead of concentrating on major issues that unite us, and can be very, very difficult to corroborate. I don’t find myself coming away from a reading with very much that I can use to understand the broad interplay of forces on the planet at the moment. I emerge saying, yes, well, so?
But I also want to say that I don’t criticize or condemn Ben. He may have been attacked by the dark and be in poor health. He may have some really good point to make that I’m not aware of. He has done yeoman work over the years and that work will stand.
I’d just like his current work to become more tightly focussed, concentrated on the really important, common issues, and clearer than what he’s currently putting out. As long as he does not consult channeled messages, I also fear that he won’t really have a sense of what I consider the really important trends and events. But then most people don’t read channeled messages.
The ones that decline to read channeled information may consider us flakes, but I think they condemn themselves to not knowing what is really happening on the planet. I think they’re left thrashing around and guessing whereas those who read SaLuSa, Matthew, Hatonn, the Arcturian Group, and others are given valuable direction and information that can’t be gotten elsewhere, especially since the galactics and spiritual hierarchy are the forces who are in the end driving events.
I understand that others are posting Ben’s columns, so it isn’t as if you are left without access to them.
While I’m on the subject, lightworkers have a really difficult assignment – a difficult two-step – and I wanted to comment a little more on it. We’re tasked with assisting the galactics and spirit hierarchy in closing down the cabal. As you can see from the recent devastating earthquake in New Zealand, which I consider a HAARP attack, or the snowstorms in the States or any other of a large number of what I think are Illuminati black operations, the cabal’s actions kill people. I want to repeat that: The cabal’s actions kill people. The cabal must be stopped and the sooner they are, the fewer people will die.
Ben, my friend in Austria, and all other lightworkers who are telling the cabal that they must stop are wishing to save lives. Or wishing to stop vicious, evil acts on the planet such as acid attacks and dowry deaths that one may not consider to have originated with the Illuminati. Or wanting to see murderous dictators like Gaddafi removed from power,
This opposition to the cabal must go forward and it must be no-nonsense, absolutely determined action because the cabal will not listen to anything else. You can see that the galactics lament that they cannot persuade the cabal to stand down. Our determined resistance may be more effective in getting them to stand down than galactic persuasion because the cabal probably will listen more to the people, whom they fear, than the galactics, whom they may not fear.
At the same time, as many of you have observed, the dark play a role in our evolution. Moreover, no one is overlooked by the Light or judged or rejected. At some point, when the dark steps down, we will all come together again and address the needs of Ascension. They will have a place at the table. We will shift from opposing them (and this is the two-step) to welcoming them.
It is very difficult to know when to stop the resolute opposition to the cabal and switch gears. If one does it too soon, one is labelled a sellout. I was told that I was infantilizing and disempowering people because I was saying that there is no cause for fear about our future. If I say we have nothing to fear from the cabal, I could be held to be avoiding the difficult fights. Etc., etc.
It’s tough to know when to switch from determined, non-violent defense to extending the hand of friendship, even though it must ultimately happen.
Even if I don’t post Ben’s columns at the moment, it doesn’t mean that I don’t appreciate his determined resistance to the cabal. It doesn’t signify taking a judgmental position towards Ben. It just means that I don’t find his commentary useful or helpful to what I’m doing over here right now. I could say that about a lot of material presently being published. Everyone has the right to choose their own sources.
So I just want to be clear about the fact that I appreciate Ben, I honor the risks that he takes to secure and disseminate his information, and I consider that he has an honored place at the table, even if I don’t publish him at the moment.