Well, I just waded through 46 spam messages from digital photo frames to Harry Potter online to Russian women seeking American husbands. Some of your messages were caught up in the spam filter and I’ve liberated and posted them. (I just finished this article, went back, and see there are 30 more spam.)
Here are some interesting stats from the new and old sites. The first day is only half over and we’ve had 7,500 hits today. Our busiest day was Oct. 15 on which several thousand people visited the site 14,000 times. The old site was viewed 676,000 times overall in its one year of operation. It was started on Oct. 9, 2009 and the progress of its growth was about similar to the illustration on the left. By the end. it had 452 regular subscribers.
Site visits have jumped after World Disclosure Day was announced at the beginning of July, after the Spirit of Ma’at Magazine featured an article, and after the mass decloaking in NYC. They ramped up by around 50% each time. On average the old site has been receiving around 7,000 clicks daily. Information from the site is going out to Facebook, Twitter, and numerous New Age, UFO, and Lightworker discussion groups.
At present there are 1950 posts and 454 pages on the new site. The old site had 2750 comments. I expect that number to fall here because the Galactic Forum allows you to hold full discussions rather than simply comment.
The comments followed a kind of evolution on the old site. At first people were simply expressing agreement or disagreement. Then you began posting information via the comments. And towards the end you were holding conversations with each other via the comments. Now, of course, you can have full-fledged conversations in the Forum.
So that gives you an idea of where we’ve come from. The minute a significant disclosure event happens the site visits will skyrocket. The days of my researching articles will end and I’ll simply have time for off-the-cuff commentary. By that time, hopefully some of you will also be ready and willing to step up to home plate as well and join me. There’ll be lots of work to do.
Now a word on sources. I specialize in posting Matthew Ward, SaLuSa, and Saul, Drunvalo Melchizedek, David Wilcock, Lauren Gorgo, Lisa Renee, and Patricia Diane Cota-Robles. Among other channelers I post Michelle Eloff when she channels, Marlene Swetlishoff, Michelle Coutant, Jennifer Hoffman, sometimes Lee Carroll, Tom Kenyon, Valerie Donner, Hannah Beaconsfleld (when she posts), Bashar, and others.
There are sources I don’t post and, when I don’t, it’s because of things that I know that I probably won’t discuss so as not to start a channel war. The channel might be consulting his or her own mind, lower entities, or simply making it up. Chances are someone who knows has alerted me.
Apart from these reports. I judge channeled messages on the basis of contradictions, inconsistencies, improbabilities, implausibilities, impossibilities, track record over time, independent research, past behavior, my own knowledge, etc.
I will post a channel and then drop him or her. Some channels were good many years ago and not now. Galactics and spirits will advise me privately, through their channels, who is reaching their sources and who not and I act on their advice. These same sources, however, will not repeat their remarks to the general public and I’m not permitted to share them with others.
So it isn’t the case that I haven’t read other sources and only read Matthew, SaLuSa and Saul. I read widely but I don’t post widely. I’ve found over time that these three are the most reliable among regular communicators. I should add that people like Lauren Gorgo and Lisa Renee also channel galactics or spirits, but they don’t channel as regularly as the other three.
I’m not scientifically inclined. I’m a social researcher, legally trained and schooled in history and sociology. My specialty has always been patterned behavior. I don’t know anything about mathematics, physics, astrophysics, astrology, ancient history, medicine, or many other fields and I don’t try to post intelligently on those subjects.
I’ve published books and articles on enlightenment, life after death, gender persecution, automation, 9/11, depleted uranium, first contact, and the 2012 scenario.
By political persuasion, I’m a social democrat or democratic socialist – in Canada, the two phrases mean much the same thing. In America, those are dirty words, but in Canada they are one political stripe among many. They translate into support for universal medicare, old-age and disability pensions, a minimum wage, unemployment insurance and similar programs supporting the “social safety net.” There is nothing dirty or nasty about my political beliefs. I’m not a stooge of some foreign power or a person out to take anyone’s rights away. If anything, I support universal freedom and sovereignty for all citizens of Earth and the ending of poverty, hunger and homelessness on the planet.
So that’s a rundown of who I am, what I’ve done and what you can expect to see here, until I’m joined by others.