Extended Oct. 1, 2010
I very much appreciate Chris’s insights and so have extended this post to include his discussion with alamojo about David’s mysterious comment that he would be all over television by the end of October.
I thank both Chris and alamaojo for participating in this clarifying exchange.
Chris begins by speculating that David Wilcock’s comment on recent audiotape points to a disclosure announcement. Speculatively as well, I agree.
Chris’ comment was made on the Share 11 Yahoo discussion group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Share11/
At about 23:00 on this recording of David’s 9/24/10 interview with Laura Fox — linked here…
…David summarizes his recent flurry of activity, and it is definitely not about his book or movie. (He says his book won’t be out till next May, due to editing timelines.)
Rather, David makes it very clear that he will be “all over the television” by the end of *this* October, and he implies in very clear terms that this will be nothing less than a worldwide publicly-televised disclosure event.
So……..here we go. It’s on: That’s my take of this interview, anyway, that we are now at the tail end of waiting and “soon” and business as usual and “TPTB”, etc., and are most likely in the early ramp-up phase of everything we have been waiting for for seemingly so, so long.
Alomojo, via the comments section of this site:
From David’s blog:
David, are you hinting that official announcements from either the White House or the Byely Dom [Russian White House] will occur this October and that’s why you “will be all over televison”?
Chris via comments:
Kurt’s question to David may have been answered very literally by the moderator, in order to protect whatever it is that David proclaimed quite audibly to Laura Fox @ 23:00 on the link provided in Steve’s post above.
The fact is, David definitely says that he will “be all over the television” by the end of October, and implies quite directly that this ties in with Disclosure. The next step in making this point would be for me to transcribe that portion of the interview in its entirety, which I do not have time to do at present.
Kurt’s question to David involves “official announcements from the White House.” Perhaps that is not what David is preparing for. Perhaps there is an entirely different source of information that David will be participating in.
As he said in Laura’s interview: he cannot divulge details. Also, fwiw, I happen to think that he may have spilled the beans a tiny bit when he mentioned that disclosure is ‘long overdue and really needs to happen.’
The specific message I picked up from David’s tone in that part of the interview is that he has complete confidence in whatever is about to happen, and that if we read between the lines, we can relax and trust the flow of events to unfold as they are destined to. (Take from that what you will — I’m speaking only for my own intuitive perception here.)
I suggest keeping a mind open to all possibilities, fixating on none, and — most importantly — attuning to our own heart-mind and intuition at this uncertain, and potent, moment in time.
Keep in mind that premature revelations of disclosure in the past appear to have resulted in its postponement. If we expect from David, and hold him to, high standards of consistency, we may overlook attempts to undo what he thinks may be “damage” from earlier remarks, etc. We’re looking at a high-stakes game, not one where ordinary rules of consistency may apply.
In the end all we can do is wait and see how it all plays out. Afterwards, David will probably say what was happening for him.
I do appreciate both of you unearthing the evidence and contributing your viewpoint. Thanks to both.