In the course of investigating the Navy’s role in disclosure, I came across this comment by UFOlogist Vince White. It’s interesting for a number of reasons.
One is that it confirms the authenticity of Clay and Shawn Pickering’s account of the two extraterrestrial groups (Conformers and Reptilians), the U.N. Military UFO Working Group, and the Pickering’s informant, “Source A.”
This is interesting in itself because the Pickering’s account flies in the face of UFOlogy’s conventional wisdom that only human galactics are allowed near the Earth – neither the “Hot Rocks” (Conformers) nor the “T-Rexes” (Reptilians) are human or humanoid and yet they are allegedly working with a U.N. group dedicated to disclosure.
Second, it tells some of the considerations around disclosure. In another article on the Pickerings, Ed Komarek said that those who cross the line in UFO disclosure face harm:
“Folks need to keep in mind that the Military UFO Working Group is not an official group but a kind of pro-disclosure insurgency within the military. It’s strong enough to leak information but when attacked it must pull back and regroup.
“The anti-disclosure forces watch the UFO community very closely so it really matters how sensitive information gets released into the public domain. Some of these military folks are putting their lives at risk for disclosure and things can get dangerous very quickly. We in the public need to understand this.
“With the death of Tony Dodd, Bill [Ryan] and Kerry [Cassidy] were able to recognize him as the source for a past interview under a code name. I was very interested in this short interview on government death squads who target, hunt down, interrogate, torture and even kill infiltrating extraterrestrials. http://www.projectcamelot.org/john_robie.html.” (2)
This gives us an idea of why the galactics approach the whole subject of disclosure very carefully.
From Vince White,
“UFO Digest Editor Replies to Updates and Comments
Regarding Purported ‘UN UFO Meeting.’ by Robert D. Morningstar
With a Commentary by Vince White”
Feb. 23, 2008
Beginning at http://www.ufodigest.com/news/0208/un_ufo2.html
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 10:56 AM, [email protected] wrote:
This note is not directed to any single individual who commented concerning possible UN meetings on disclosures. It is the overall response pattern that dismays and concerns. It does not reflect well on the flexibility and adaptive quality of our research community. I do not know the sources and circumstances well enough to either accept or reject the particular accounts.
It does, however, merit serious discussion. Moreover the reports of extreme contentious squabbling, short-sighted self interest, religious dogmatic disputations, the refusal to think in other than the most immediate national provincialism, has a strong ring of truth. It reminds one of some UFO conferences. …
I am writing to let you all know that I, along with Dr. Michael Salla, received the same information about the UN UFO Meeting and I have been kept abreast of developments in this disclosure process for many months now.
I have met and conversed by phone/email many times with Shawn and Clay Pickering and, although we don’t agree 100% on UFO Disclosure theory, we do hold many similar views in UFOlogy, one of which is in regard to its effects on mass psychology, which is the basis of the “non-disclosure” policy of the United States and most governments, in general, Belgium, Mexico and Brazil being the exceptions.
This is something we all know (or should know) since the revelations of The Robertson Panel in the early 1950s (1) and The Brookings Institution white paper determinations, written for NASA in the 1960s (“On the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space”).
I received word of the prospective UN UFO meeting a couple of days before the event and I too was surprised but I should not have been considering the magnitude of events that have transpired in UFOlogy since the National Press Club UFO Conference (sponsored by James Fox and Leslie Kean) in Washington, DC on November 12th, 2008 and the recent Stephensville UFO flap (which continues even now).
Clay and Shawn first informed me of their contact’s existence and their “source’s” background on June 24th at the UFO Culture of Contact Symposium here in NYC. At that time, they presented a second copy of the famous SOM-101 (purportedly an official government UFO Crash Retrieval Manual), which they allowed me to inspect and which I recognized instantly to be a nearly perfect Xerox copy of an original source document (with perfectly aligned margins, no bent or folded pages, no fuzzy type as in the photographed copy which appeared about 10 years ago, when I first read it).
This copy appeared to be more detailed in some ways than the version that has been circulating during intervening years (available from Ryan and Dr. Bob Wood at www.majesticdocuments.com).
It was the Pickering’s copy of this document, SOM-101, and the coherent story that they told of how it was acquired by their source that drew me to follow the lead.
As stated above, we have had many meetings and exchanges of information (what I like to call “cross-pollination of information”) during the past 8 months, which have given me confidence in the source and the document they presented at the NYC Culture of Contact UFO Conference symposium (organized by Jeremy Vaeni and Alan Steinfeld)
The basic premise and the purpose behind this “secret” UN UFO meeting was a “testing of the waters” in order to prepare for worldwide UFO disclosure through the United Nations. The story was intentionally leaked through the Pickering Brothers in order to evaluate the reaction of the public and the UFO community.
Basically, the US government wants to study the reaction of the public at large and UFOlogists, in particular, to the prospect of full UFO disclosure sometime within the next 8-9 years.
I must say that the reaction of the general public has been promising but that of most UFOlogists (commenting in UFO Updates) has been somewhat disappointing, most of them devoid of curiosity or open-mindedness although the comments of others, older and more experienced – having known or lived through the Leonard Stringfield era – have weighed in with open minds and more intelligent, less emotional comments.
The UFO Disclosure operation is a very delicate matter, which will take quite a bit of time to achieve while exercising great caution on the part of governments all along the way. The indoctrinated, misinformed or disinformed human mind (such as those of religious fanatics) is a very fragile entity and a very dangerous one when rattled.
The public mind must be protected while the work of untangling the lies and cover stories of 60 years is being done. It is very much a “psychosurgical procedure,” excising the lies that have been implanted in the public mind to be replaced by facts as they really are.
During this delicate period, both the public mind and the identity of the source(s) must be protected so that the work of Disclosure can be completed without peril to either the subject or the source(s).
In the meantime, “I watch the skies.”
(1) The Robertson Panel made it the standard approach to UFO investigations to ridicule any allegations made in order to cover up the existence of UFOs and ETs.
(2) Ed Komarek, “On Cabbages and Kings,” at http://exopolitics.blogspot.com/2009/11/cabbages-and-kings.html.