Readers who follow the literature that we do may see in this retreat of the CIA (because it’s the CIA that’s behind these efforts, as far as I’m aware) from South America an ending of an imperialist chapter in our history that will only consolidate in the years ahead. Expect the closing of the School of the Americas and a reconstruction of the IMF as well. It cannot come too soon.
Thursday 24 June 2010
Director Oliver Stone and Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez stand in front of a painting of Simon Bolivar. (Photo: Jose Ibanez)
On April 13, 2002, an event occurred in Venezuela which was as world historical for South America as the fall of the Berlin Wall was for Eastern Europe: a US-backed coup against the democratically-elected government of Venezuela collapsed. The Bush administration’s efforts to promote the coup failed in the face of popular resistance in Venezuela and diplomatic resistance in the region.
The failure of the Bush administration’s effort to overthrow President Chavez was world historical for South America because it sent a powerful new signal about the limits of the ability of the United States to thwart popular democracy in the region. In the years prior to the reversal of the US-backed coup, popular movements in South America had suffered from a widespread “Allende syndrome”: a key legacy of the US-orchestrated overthrow of democracy in Chile in 1973 was the widespread belief that there was a sharp limit to the popular economic reforms that could be achieved through the ballot box, because the United States simply wouldn’t allow formal democracy in the region to respond to the economic needs of the majority.
Following the reversal of the US-backed coup, a succession of presidents were elected across South America promising to reverse the disastrous economic policies promoted by Washington in the region through the International Monetary Fund for the previous 20 years and to promote, instead, the economic interests of the majority: Brazil elected Lula in 2002, Argentina elected Nestor Kirchner in 2003, Bolivia elected Evo Morales in 2005, Ecuador elected Rafael Correa in 2006 and Paraguay elected Fernando Lugo in 2008.
The story of this dramatic transformation has been largely untold in the United States. Our major corporate media are largely uninterested in the freedom narrative of South America, because it’s significantly a narrative of freedom from control by US institutions and because the battle is ongoing, as shown recently by Washington’s fury at Brazil for working against a US push for new sanctions against Iran and by Ecuador’s decision to recall its ambassador after Israel’s attack on the Gaza Freedom Flotilla.
But on Friday, Oliver Stone’s new documentary “South of the Border” opens in New York (currently scheduled screenings nationwide are here). In this movie, Stone tells the story that the US media has missed. Because it’s a Stone movie and because it’s being commercially distributed, there’s a strong possibility that many Americans who are not connected to the alternative press could have the opportunity to see and hear this story for the first time.
Stone introduces us to leaders that most people in the United States have never had the opportunity to see speaking for themselves.
Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez explains the Bush administration’s effort to overthrow him:
Ecuador’s President Rafael Correa, who got his Ph.D. in economics from the University of Illinois, explains why he followed through on his campaign promise to get rid of the US military base at Manta:
And Brazil’s President Lula da Silva – recently vilified in the US media for his efforts to mediate a deal between the US and Iran on Iran’s nuclear program, with pundits demanding that Brazil “get back in its lane” – explains that he has no interest in fighting with the US, but only wants to be treated as equals:
If many Americans get to see it, this could be Stone’s most important movie in terms of its social impact, because it’s forward looking: it’s about a conflict that’s going on right now and will continue in the future, pitting a South America that both wants to govern itself in the interests of the majority and speak its voice without fear in world affairs against the latter-day devotees of the Monroe Doctrine who want to keep the region subservient to the interests of US elites.
One would have hoped that Americans who saw Stone’s Vietnam movies – “Platoon” and “Born on the Fourth of July” – would be much more likely to oppose the imperial quagmire in Afghanistan. But with so much of the media under corporate control, we need popular documentaries that speak directly to the issues of the day. “South of the Border” speaks directly to the relationship between the US and South America. If many Americans see it, it could help bring about a fundamental transformation in US policy toward all of Latin America. Maybe, sooner rather than later,” as President Allende once said, we’ll be able to look back at last year’s US-supported coup in Honduras and say with confidence that it was the last.